Before it's too late

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sdreid
    Commissioner
    • Feb 2008
    • 4956

    #91
    Does anyone know if an individual's name was taken down when they bought a railroad passenger ticket?
    This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

    Stan Reid

    Comment

    • Robert
      Commissioner
      • Feb 2008
      • 5163

      #92
      Hi Stan

      Well, Andy Spallek's the man for this, though I should think it would have been impossibly bureaucratic to take a name every time a ticket was sold. However. long term tickets entitling the holder to travel for several months or a year might have the person's name and address on the back, in case the ticket got lost and handed in. I doubt if the railway company would have a record, though.

      Comment

      • John Savage
        Detective
        • Feb 2008
        • 149

        #93
        Hi Stan,

        Whilst I doubt that names would have been recorded for single or return tickets it does seem that they recorded names for season tickets as the below picture courtesy of the National Railway Museum, York shows.

        This was the railway line used by Druitt.
        Attached Files

        Comment

        • sdreid
          Commissioner
          • Feb 2008
          • 4956

          #94
          Thanks guys. So I guess faint hope at most.
          This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

          Stan Reid

          Comment

          • sdreid
            Commissioner
            • Feb 2008
            • 4956

            #95
            Originally posted by sdreid View Post
            I was 24 when Inspector Keaton died.
            Was this the only "involved" person to be recorded on audio? There were means of recording going all the way back to 1888.
            This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

            Stan Reid

            Comment

            • sdreid
              Commissioner
              • Feb 2008
              • 4956

              #96
              Are there any aerial photos of Whitechapel in that era? They would have to be from a lighter than air craft obviously.
              This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

              Stan Reid

              Comment

              • corey123
                Inspector
                • Nov 2009
                • 1472

                #97
                Stan,

                The airplain wasn't invinted untill the early 1900's. So, I dont think there would be.

                Also, I don't think they had yet invinted a camera that could withstand the elements of arial flight. It would have to be compatable with however many feet the plain flew in the air.

                I think I have seen a drawing of Whitechapel drawn by an artist in a hot air ballon.

                Not as good or preciese as a photo though.
                Washington Irving:

                "To a homeless man, who has no spot on this wide world which he can truly call his own, there is a momentary feeling of something like independence and territorial consequence, when, after a weary day's travel, he kicks off his boots, thrusts his feet into slippers, and stretches himself before an inn fire. Let the world without go as it may; let kingdoms rise and fall, so long as he has the wherewithal to pay his bills, he is, for the time being, the very monarch of all he surveys. The arm chair in his throne; the poker his sceptre, and the little parlour of some twelve feet square, his undisputed empire. "

                Stratford-on-Avon

                Comment

                • sdreid
                  Commissioner
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 4956

                  #98
                  Yes, the airplane wasn't developed until 1903. That's why I said lighter than air, that is, light-gas and hot-air balloons as well as some primitive airships. There were kites and gliders too but they would likely have been too unstable.
                  This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

                  Stan Reid

                  Comment

                  • corey123
                    Inspector
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 1472

                    #99
                    HI stan,

                    Sorry, didn't see that. Well I do remember seeing a drawing, I think on John Bennetts thread of photos. I am not sure though. However, I am sure there is one.
                    Washington Irving:

                    "To a homeless man, who has no spot on this wide world which he can truly call his own, there is a momentary feeling of something like independence and territorial consequence, when, after a weary day's travel, he kicks off his boots, thrusts his feet into slippers, and stretches himself before an inn fire. Let the world without go as it may; let kingdoms rise and fall, so long as he has the wherewithal to pay his bills, he is, for the time being, the very monarch of all he surveys. The arm chair in his throne; the poker his sceptre, and the little parlour of some twelve feet square, his undisputed empire. "

                    Stratford-on-Avon

                    Comment

                    • Radical Joe
                      Constable
                      • Sep 2009
                      • 52

                      #100
                      Originally posted by corey123 View Post
                      Stan,

                      The airplain wasn't invinted untill the early 1900's. So, I dont think there would be.

                      Also, I don't think they had yet invinted a camera that could withstand the elements of arial flight. It would have to be compatable with however many feet the plain flew in the air.

                      I think I have seen a drawing of Whitechapel drawn by an artist in a hot air ballon.

                      Not as good or preciese as a photo though.
                      According to this http://www.papainternational.org/history.html aerial photography was first used in 1858.

                      Comment

                      • sdreid
                        Commissioner
                        • Feb 2008
                        • 4956

                        #101
                        Thanks Joe. I would have expected that is was some time before 1888 because there was some relatively high speed film by then.
                        This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

                        Stan Reid

                        Comment

                        • sdreid
                          Commissioner
                          • Feb 2008
                          • 4956

                          #102
                          I see on that site that rocket photography as well as a pigeon cam were also under development so that makes 7 possible platforms with 3 LTAs, kites and gliders.
                          This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

                          Stan Reid

                          Comment

                          • sdreid
                            Commissioner
                            • Feb 2008
                            • 4956

                            #103
                            I wonder if anyone connected to the early Ripper movies might have conducted some interviews.
                            This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

                            Stan Reid

                            Comment

                            • sdreid
                              Commissioner
                              • Feb 2008
                              • 4956

                              #104
                              Originally posted by sdreid View Post
                              I wonder if anyone connected to the early Ripper movies might have conducted some interviews.
                              By this I meant, interviewed extant people who had an actual connection to the case.
                              This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

                              Stan Reid

                              Comment

                              • sdreid
                                Commissioner
                                • Feb 2008
                                • 4956

                                #105
                                Originally posted by sdreid View Post
                                By this I meant, interviewed extant people who had an actual connection to the case.
                                The same would hold true for the 50th anniversary newspaper and magazine articles.
                                This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

                                Stan Reid

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X