Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Special Branch Register and Ledger-decison Notice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • mariab
    replied
    2 great finds, Lynn, and both with a reference to Mr. Doughty!

    Pertaining to the R. Churchill entry not being “apparent“ anymore in the ledgers (does this mean that it's been redacted?), could this be explained by the fact that it might refer to W. Churchill's father? Or that it might have been understood as referring to him?

    To Phil Carter:
    Call me slow, but the entry “Jack the Ripper...The name given to Wilson at Bushmills“ I really don't understand. Can it refer to a nickname spotted by someone called Wilson having simply resided in Bushmills??

    From the single page of the SB ledgers I've seen (a page apparently available to everyone in Ripperology), it's clear that the ledgers are an alphabetically, not chronologically organized list. Still, I'm sure it's possible to figure out the time-frame the ledgers cover (if it hasn't been done already) through the cases featured in them.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chris
    replied
    Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
    As is known during the appeal process the Metropolitan Police provided me with the details of two entries appertaining to The Whitechapel Murders from the registers which I had identified by viewing the registers in their now redacted form.

    The specific entries referred to were as follows...-

    Under a specific entry titled “Jack the Ripper” the entry reads “The name given to Wilson at Bushmills

    Under a second entry relating to a file submitted by “Chief Inspector Littlechild” the entry reads “Suspect O`Brien & the Whitechapel Murders”

    In addition I obtained from a confidential source details of another entry which is purported to be in the register this entry reads “R Churchill- Perpetrator of the Whitechapel Murders”
    Thank you for posting this interesting information.

    There's one thing I'm not clear about. When you say that you had identified the first two of these by looking at the redacted documents, does that mean that you've searched the whole register and that these (and presumably the Magrath entry that we already know about from Clutterbuck's thesis) were the only entries that could be identified as referring to the Whitechapel Murders?

    If so, do you have any idea why the "Churchill" entry wasn't apparent? If not, does that mean that part of the (redacted) register has still to be searched for references to the case?

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    William O'Brien

    Hello All. Here is the reference to William O'Brien.

    ("The Guardian" same date as above.)

    Cheers.
    LC

    "William O'Brien's life was dear to every Irishman, except the
    coercionists but dear as his life was to the people of Ireland, it
    ought to be dearer to Balfour. God help Balfour, soul and body, if
    anything happened to William O'Brien. (Loud cheers.) Without
    becoming irreverent, he would say that the curse of God would
    speedily descend on Balfour's head, and the fate of Castlereagb,
    who cut his own throat, would be nothing to the fate that would
    occur to Balfour. They said the wish was father to the thought,
    and he himself pleaded guilty to the wish if anything happened to
    William O'Brien."
    The city of Limerick was last week proclaimed under the
    four sections of the Crimes Act which related to preliminary
    inquiries, the summary jurisdiction Of resident magistrates,
    special juries, and removal of trials. This step has been taken
    with the view of dealing with speakers who incite the people to
    break the law, rather than with other forms of crime, from
    which the district is at present very free.
    Mr. Davitt, who was last week at Limerick raising money for
    a Celtic cross in memory of the " Manchester martyrs," insisted
    that Mr. O'Brien, having made a heroic protest against being
    treated as a common felon, should not risk his life by refusing
    whatever might be necessary in the way of food and clothing.
    He should, he said, rest satisfied with doing all a man of honour
    and principle was called on to do, without sacrificing his life to
    gratify Mr. Balfour's mean and cowardly desire for' vengeance.
    At this meeting Mr. Davitt gave some account of the form of
    Home Rule which he desired. "It was," he said—
    " The Irish Nationalists, and not English parties, who should
    formulate a Constitution which had to undo the evil effects of
    English misgovernment in Ireland. The scheme of a single Chamber
    with two orders and with separate voting power which was contained
    in Mr. Gladstone's Home Rule Bill was unsatisfactory and unworkable.
    The retention of Irish members in an English Parliament
    when Irish questions were not discussed there would be building up
    materials for future obstruction with a vengeance. A dual order,
    such as was proposed in Mr. Gladstone's Bill, would only ensure perpetual
    obstruction and prolong the contest with the class of
    ascendancy, and he sincerely hoped that this part of the Bill was as
    dead as the system of land purchase which marked with failure its
    twin measure of Home Rule. It would be impossible to safeguard
    the rights of the minority without violating the rights of constitutional
    government; but there was not a Catholic or Nationalist in
    Ireland who would not, nevertheless, give the Protestants the fullest
    representation their numbers entitled them to. In a legislature of
    300 members by a system of scrutin de liste there would be seventy-five
    members to represent them."
    On Sunday Mr. Davitt spoke at a meeting, at Stepaside, a few
    miles from Dublin. He professed to feel great confidence in
    the progress of the movement for Home Rule ; but the effect of
    the Crimes Act and the apathy of the farmers were evidently
    troubling him. Referring to the doings of Messrs. Pyne, Cox,
    and Gilhooly, he said he did not think a hide-and-seek policy
    was very dignified. If some were inclined to give the police a
    run for it through the country, the Irish people would not misinterpret
    their meaning. He was, however, anxious that the
    people of Great Britain, America, and Europe should learn that
    the Nationalists, instead of running away from coercion, would
    willingly meet any consequences that they might incur from
    their love of liberty.
    Mr. Pyne, who has taken refuge in the old tower of Lisfarny
    Castle to prevent the execution of the warrant for his arrest,
    was on Sunday visited by several National League contingents,
    headed by bands. He was let down by a rope from a height of
    80ft. to within about 15ft. of the ground, and listened to
    addresses read to him. After expressing his determination to
    offer the utmost resistance to the police he was hauled up again.
    It is said that the Crown does not intend proceeding in the
    case against the Lord Mayor for publishing reports of meetings
    of suppressed branches of the League, which was remitted by
    the superior court to the magistrates, as an entry on the record
    of the police-court that the case was " dismissed," would raise
    serious if not fatal obstacles to its further prosecution. Fresh
    proceedings, however, will be instituted, not only against the
    Nation, but against other papers that are offending in a similar
    way.
    Mr. Henry Doughty, who calls himself the London working
    men's delegate to Ireland, was on Friday last sentenced to a
    month's imprisonment for inciting people to adopt the Plan of
    Campaign and to join the League in a proclaimed district.
    Mr. Doughty on hearing the sentence rose, and, waving his hat
    in the air, shouted " God save Ireland." The cry was taken up
    by the people in court, a number of soldiers belonging to the
    Leinster regiment being especially demonstrative. The magistrate
    immediately sentenced a countryman who was arrested in
    the act of observing for O'Brien to a week's imprisonment, and
    the tumult subsided. Mr. Doughty was subsequently removed
    to the gaol at Limerick, care being taken to prevent anything
    like a disturbance on the way."

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    O'Brien, take 2

    Hello All. perhaps this O'Brien? This, I think, is William O'Brien. I will dig out another reference later.

    (Snippet from "The Echo" November 23, 1887.)

    Cheers.
    LC
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Phil Carter
    replied
    Hello Maria,

    Indeed, I believe Neil to be correct here when he says

    ... I will point out the O'Brien report is contemporary. Surely this is exactly the reason Trevor persued this cause, new lines.
    We have these entries..

    Jack the Ripper...The name given to Wilson at Bushmills,
    Littlechild............Suspect O'Brien and the Whitechapel Murders
    R Churchill......... Perpetrator of the Whitechapel murders

    All contemporary entries.

    As Neil also points out, the initial and indeed the easiest conclusion would be to jump at Lord Randolph Churchill being the reference to which the entry refers.. but we don't know that for certain.

    That goes for a Wilson at Bushmills, and the O'Brien name as Norma points out too.

    All new leads.

    To my mind that leaves one the opportunity to precipitate research as far as possible on these contemporary names, a la McGrath.

    From my understanding, the names were written in alphabetically, and not chronologically. The registers, with all 30,000 odd entries were an overview of the files that Special Branch had, or a reference system to the files, or even an index listing if you prefer.
    The date of entry is not recorded in the ledgers, nor is there a date referral in each case. But the actual ledgers themselves encompass a time period.
    An enormous amount of time must have been used by Littlechild, Anderson, Monro et al putting them together.


    best wishes

    Phil
    Last edited by Phil Carter; 07-10-2011, 03:45 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • mariab
    replied
    Many thanks to Monty and Phil Carter for taking care of my ignorant questions.

    Originally posted by Monty View Post
    I think you have just insulted Rob.
    Sweet.

    Leave a comment:


  • Monty
    replied
    Maria,

    I think you have just insulted Rob.

    Yes, I'm referring to Randolph, however it may be a different R Churchill. The date of this report will make interesting reading if it was about Randy.

    Bushmills is a huge Whiskey distillary in Ireland. Not sure if they had warehouse/bars in London during that period, I assume they did.

    Whilst I accept Phils valid points I will point out the O'Brien report is contemporary. Surely this is exactly the reason Trevor persued this cause, new lines.

    Monty

    Leave a comment:


  • Phil Carter
    replied
    Originally posted by mariab View Post
    Is Bushmills a prison? Apologies for my ignorance, again.
    Hello Maria,



    It is a small village in the very north of Northern Ireland, famous for it's whisky.
    It is a 15 minute walk from the Giant's Causeway.

    best wishes

    Phil
    Last edited by Phil Carter; 07-10-2011, 04:26 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • mariab
    replied
    Is Bushmills a prison? Apologies for my ignorance, again.

    Leave a comment:


  • Phil Carter
    replied
    Originally posted by Natalie Severn View Post
    ...It may be worth remembering too that one O'Brien' of that time ,a Matthew O'Brien [aka John Sinclair ,Mr Roberts,Mr Wilson] was a double agent and caused Jenkinson and Spencer great angst when he blackmailed them......but there were several other "O'Briens' connected with both the Fenian movement , the Land league and the wider political scene.
    Norma
    my emphasis

    Hello Norma,

    Interesting here is the name Wilson cropping up in connection with the name O'Brien.

    In the ledgers.. "Jack the Ripper- name given to Wilson at Bushmills"

    Just an observation.

    best wishes

    Phil

    Leave a comment:


  • mariab
    replied
    Thank you so much for the information, Grave Maurice. I just caught wind of the name Randolph Churchill on the JTRForums. It looks like this is a suspect from the D'Ostonian era? I'll read the old casebook thread you've attached later tonight.
    Thank you.

    And to Lynn:
    I'll read your fascinating new thread pertaining to Phoenix Park ASAP.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    O'Brien

    Hello All. Regarding O'Brien: there was an Edward O'Brien involved in the Phoenix Park murders. But he was serving a sentence until 1891.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • The Grave Maurice
    replied
    Originally posted by mariab View Post
    ...the only Churchill I'm aware of is Winston.
    Lord Randolph Churchill was Sir Winston's dad, Maria. He has been suggested as a suspect, but not really very seriously. You can read about him here:

    Leave a comment:


  • mariab
    replied
    For some reason, I didn't mention Monty in my top 3 Ripperologist researchers. Possibly for the reason that I tend to consider him in complete tandem with Rob Clack. Thus he was included, if indirectly.

    Originally posted by Monty View Post
    You don't need to be Rob Clack to figure out R Churchill Maria.
    Many apologies, Monty, but the only Churchill I'm aware of is Winston. Not as acquainted with British history as with French history. So sorry for my ignorance. And I'm not sure if the Hutch reference is a joke or not.

    Originally posted by Debra A View Post
    The detective agency concerned 'Nielsen of Wealdstone'
    Might I inquire if this is known through the SB ledgers directly, or otherwise?
    Thank you.

    And a little late night conjecture, pretty wild: Could it be that Dr. H. J. O'Brien was arrested/was under suspicion again subsequently to June 2, perhaps in relation to William Magrath and Tumblety?
    From the article quoted by Monty it appears that O'Brien's letters were examined simply for (Fenian) content.
    Last edited by mariab; 07-10-2011, 03:43 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Monty
    replied
    Extremely valid points Phil,

    Though my words on O'Brien were more questions than arguements.

    Monty

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X