Originally posted by The Grave Maurice
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Special Branch Register and Ledger-decison Notice
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Monty View PostYou don't need to be Rob Clack to figure out R Churchill Maria.
Monty
I was intrigued by this, having recently watched a TV documentary on Jenny Jerome Churchill, which mentioned some details about her husband, including his personality and mental state.
I had said, half-jokingly, "there's a Jack the Ripper type!" My companion said that a fiction book she was reading on the Whitechapel murders did mention that Randolph Churchill was a suspect.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Chris View PostThat decision acknowledges a blunder in the interpretation of the law which I find absolutely astonishing.
Confidentiality was the question on which the whole appeal depended, and the Tribunal made its decision in the belief that confidentiality was irrelevant!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Barrister View PostWhat is the status of the appeal? Can Casebooks subscribers help? Thanks
Barrister
That decision acknowledges a blunder in the interpretation of the law which I find absolutely astonishing. The implication was that the Tribunal didn't actually know whether or not the disputed information was exempt from disclosure, but they excused themselves from making that decision because it would "involve a disproportionate amount of time and effort". They concluded that "the greatest [sic] part of it" was exempt on the balance of probabilities, but obviously the law requires that all of it should be exempt on the balance of probabilities. What can one do?
Leave a comment:
-
What is the status of the appeal? Can Casebooks subscribers help? Thanks
Barrister
Leave a comment:
-
Byrne
Hello Debs. Thanks.
Is there a link to the "Byrne" who finagled knives for Phoenix Park?
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Hi Debs. It's nice to see you trying your hand at a little research for a change, instead of leaving it to Trevor to do all the hard work.
Yours truly,
Tom Wescott
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View PostI have identified who the entry refers to along with the other names mentioned from the ledgers but after all the headaches and pain I suffered in getting them and subsequently identifying them I have decided to keep them to myself
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by RobertM View PostMelbourne, December 3rd - In connection with the Hawthorne Mystery, a Sydney resident named Wilson is reported to be missing; he was assaulted and robbed, and gave a man in charge for this offence.
At the trial Wilson did not appear to prosecute, and a warrant was issued for his arrest as an unwilling witness, but he was never found.
The detectives have received two anonymous letters concluding with the words 'beware of Jack the Ripper'.
Coincendence?
Leave a comment:
-
Does this have a link to 'Wilson'?
Melbourne, December 3rd - In connection with the Hawthorne Mystery, a Sydney resident named Wilson is reported to be missing; he was assaulted and robbed, and gave a man in charge for this offence.
At the trial Wilson did not appear to prosecute, and a warrant was issued for his arrest as an unwilling witness, but he was never found.
The detectives have received two anonymous letters concluding with the words 'beware of Jack the Ripper'.
Coincendence?
Leave a comment:
-
Appeal ?
Dodgy buisness the appeal, with what I've seen in the press about the British Police force and some British Newspaper's lately, all the best of luck any way Trevor. " Justice ".......
Leave a comment:
-
New appeal
I would like to inform the community that after studying the Tribunals decision notice. I am of the opinion that there are two separate grounds for seeking leave to appeal to The Upper Tribunal.
One is on a point of law, the second is with regards to proceedure.
On the first I am asking for the decison to be set aside and my appeal allowed.
On the second I am asking for the decison to be set aside and a new tribunal convened before a new Judge and new members.
I have submitted the notice of appeal and must now await another Judge considering the appeal grounds. He will then either rule on one or both as to whether there are sufficient grounds for the matter to be sent to The Upper Tribunal.
As an when that decison is known I will update everyone.
Leave a comment:
-
Hello Hunter,
Looks to me like a hurried bodge-job of an article. It must be remembered that the Sunday newspapers were full of one story only that day.. the phone hacking story.
best wishes
Phil
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: