Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pentagram

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hello Dan,

    I await your thread.
    Washington Irving:

    "To a homeless man, who has no spot on this wide world which he can truly call his own, there is a momentary feeling of something like independence and territorial consequence, when, after a weary day's travel, he kicks off his boots, thrusts his feet into slippers, and stretches himself before an inn fire. Let the world without go as it may; let kingdoms rise and fall, so long as he has the wherewithal to pay his bills, he is, for the time being, the very monarch of all he surveys. The arm chair in his throne; the poker his sceptre, and the little parlour of some twelve feet square, his undisputed empire. "

    Stratford-on-Avon

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Daniel Gillotti View Post

      This time I'm asking for a serious peer review be positive or criticize but please don't be abusive...
      But, what if you propose The Giant Cricket Of Valhalla or something?

      A good motive would be an accomplishment on it's own.
      Dave McConniel

      Comment


      • Oi vey.

        Who needs a groundhog--spring is most definately here.
        “Sans arme, sans violence et sans haine”

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Daniel Gillotti View Post
          In two days I'm posting a new thread "Jack The Ripper and his Identity"

          This time I'm asking for a serious peer review be positive or criticize but please don't be abusive...

          Thanks Dan...
          Can't respectfully wait that long.

          Amitis,
          David

          Comment


          • And the winner is.......

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Daniel Gillotti View Post
              Hey Corey:



              In two days I'm posting a new thread "Jack The Ripper and his Identity"

              This time I'm asking for a serious peer review be positive or criticize but please don't be abusive...

              Thanks Dan...

              We wait with breath suitably bated! Dan people won't be abusive to you if you treat them with a little bit of respect, but if you start having a go at people they will strike back.

              Comment


              • Hello Dan!

                You are welcome to present the new thread.

                But me personally I've learnt on these boards to keep one thing in mind;

                I am not above criticism, you are not above criticism, no-one is.

                And most of all; none of us is unmistakable!

                All the best
                Jukka
                "When I know all about everything, I am old. And it's a very, very long way to go!"

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Daniel Gillotti View Post
                  awesome pentagram while I was looking at it, I discovered something else and when I looked at it closer it blew me away, because of septic blue, I believe I found the solution and what the C5 murders by locations really is.

                  This discovery I made tonight, to me, cements my Ripper suspect and no its not D'onston even though I hinted around with my threads that he was.

                  In two days I'm posting a new thread "Jack The Ripper and his Identity"

                  This time I'm asking for a serious peer review be positive or criticize but please don't be abusive...

                  Thanks Dan...

                  What a crock. Absolutely no, I will not agree to not abuse you after that post. For the entirety of this thread you've been flaunting your 40 years of research and using that as a cudgel against those who refuse to take you seriously. You have all but directly stated that D'onston was your suspect based on all that careful research and then, in one days time you've tossed out your research and have solved it with a brand new theory and a brand new suspect? And you expect us to take it seriously?

                  I don't think so. A genuine theory, contemplated and considered, no matter how flawed or faulty is worth a listen to, if for no other reason than to point out the errors. But when you toss out the theory in one day when the flaw is revealed and suddenly have a brand new one all ready to go, why should anyone take you or your theories seriously? They appear to be something you change like underwear.

                  Let all Oz be agreed;
                  I need a better class of flying monkeys.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Ally View Post
                    They appear to be something you change like underwear.



                    Amitiés,
                    David

                    Comment


                    • Pentagram

                      Originally posted by Bob Hinton View Post
                      We wait with breath suitably bated! Dan people won't be abusive to you if you treat them with a little bit of respect, but if you start having a go at people they will strike back.
                      Bob:

                      I'm sorry for the comment I made about you it was inappropriate especially when I was trying to defuse the situation; again, I apologize I hope we can put that in the past.

                      Dan...

                      Comment


                      • pentagram

                        Originally posted by Ally View Post
                        What a crock. Absolutely no, I will not agree to not abuse you after that post. For the entirety of this thread you've been flaunting your 40 years of research and using that as a cudgel against those who refuse to take you seriously. You have all but directly stated that D'onston was your suspect based on all that careful research and then, in one days time you've tossed out your research and have solved it with a brand new theory and a brand new suspect? And you expect us to take it seriously?

                        I don't think so. A genuine theory, contemplated and considered, no matter how flawed or faulty is worth a listen to, if for no other reason than to point out the errors. But when you toss out the theory in one day when the flaw is revealed and suddenly have a brand new one all ready to go, why should anyone take you or your theories seriously? They appear to be something you change like underwear.
                        Hi Alley:

                        I haven't been completely forthcoming on everything I've been working on, the guy I'm going to reveal was always my ripper suspect. But, I always had a suspicion that because this is an occult and black magic there is usually more then one involved, and D'onston makes a perfect accomplice so no I'm not shying off of D'onston I need him to connect him to my ripper suspect.

                        Dan...

                        Comment


                        • Hi Dan,

                          Spit it out, who's your suspect! Seriously, maybe some people on here have information they could share with you. Is he someone well-known?

                          Yours truly,

                          Tom Wescott

                          Comment


                          • Hi Tom,

                            Le Grand.

                            Amitiés,
                            David

                            Comment


                            • Well, ain't that a bitch.

                              Yours truly,

                              Tom Wescott

                              Comment


                              • Thought it was a pimp.

                                Amitiés,
                                David

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X