Originally posted by Barnaby
View Post
I think what were trying to get at with a Slaughterhouseman is probable multiple exposures to the act of murder using a knife and the subsequent indifference to the act that would follow,.. which is possibly evident in the crimes when considering based on the evidence, the act of killing itself held no special meaning to him based on the time he takes to cut their throats before moving on to mutilations. I know Murder sounds like a stretch when animals are the victims, but it isnt inaccurate to call the act that.
In Jacks "sequencing"...we have the Pick Up, The Struggle that allows him to get them unconscious or semi so and on the ground,The Kill....in his case using more cuts or force than required to their throats.. perhaps to ensure success...but he almost decapitates most victims,...then there is the Postmortem Mutilations, then The Getaway.
There is no evidence that The Kill was anything more than a step to the next level for this killer. Perhaps suggesting that the taking of life wasnt his primary goal...but rather a necessary one.
In terms or overall time taken from start to finish...I think its clear with the Canonicals the actual kill was brief compared with the postmortem work.
Best regards.
Comment