The Babysitter/Snow Killer

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • sdreid
    replied
    Yes, there was a case here where it's been argued that the print was open to interpretation so to speak. I think that a clear print is pretty conclusive if there's no other good explanation for it being there but, in the real world, the prints aren't always clear.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cogidubnus
    replied
    Hi Stan

    It's about as hard to argue against DNA as it is to argue against fingerprints.
    In the UK at least, fingerprint evidence is now held in slightly less total trust than it was, with the recognition that much fingerprint evidence is interpretational, and that interpretation can be as much art as science.

    I think the Shirley McKie case would interest you Stan...it did me. This link takes you to a page with links to the hearings, the official inquiry and the report.

    http://www.thefingerprintinquiryscot...nquiry/25.html

    Hope you can spare a few hours for a really good read...

    All the best

    Dave

    Leave a comment:


  • sdreid
    replied
    And, not just because some of the victims were female.

    Leave a comment:


  • sdreid
    replied
    Originally posted by sdreid View Post
    According to the Wiki article, Gacy's DNA doesn't match though.
    And the victims don't match either.

    Leave a comment:


  • sdreid
    replied
    As I recall, there are no fingerprints in the case.

    Leave a comment:


  • sdreid
    replied
    I don't know of any twin suspects here so that DNA hitch wouldn't be an issue.

    Leave a comment:


  • sdreid
    replied
    DNA only comes up short when it comes to identical twins in the inclusive sense.

    Leave a comment:


  • sdreid
    replied
    Originally posted by sdreid View Post
    According to the Wiki article, Gacy's DNA doesn't match though.
    It's about as hard to argue against DNA as it is to argue against fingerprints.

    Leave a comment:


  • sdreid
    replied
    Originally posted by sdreid View Post
    Like other unsolved cases, we seem to continue to add new suspects but rarely eliminate any.
    Gacy is eliminated in my book though.

    Leave a comment:


  • sdreid
    replied
    According to the Wiki article, Gacy's DNA doesn't match though.

    Leave a comment:


  • sdreid
    replied
    Like other unsolved cases, we seem to continue to add new suspects but rarely eliminate any.
    Last edited by sdreid; 05-01-2014, 04:50 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • sdreid
    replied
    That situation might fit one of the suspects.

    Leave a comment:


  • sdreid
    replied
    He may have been supported by family.

    Leave a comment:


  • sdreid
    replied
    Originally posted by sdreid View Post
    2-He was unemployed in some fashion.
    That doesn't necessarily mean that he was receiving unemployment compensation though.

    Leave a comment:


  • sdreid
    replied
    Maybe the guy was in the snow removal business.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X