Originally posted by Pierre
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
R.L.S., H.J., & E.H.: a questions of sources and results
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Pierre View PostIsn´t it sufficient with the "explanations" given by the attackers "Henry Flower", "David Orsam" and "GUT"?
PierreG U T
There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GUT View PostWhy not. (You might get a tax deduction anyway).
Doesn't take much for that one to claim to be an expert on anything.
Still can't believe he claims to be a great historian
The limits to my knowledge of how to power pre-Holland and Lake subs is that of the U.S.S. Turtle (Bushnell's Revolutionary craft), and the C.S.S. Hunley (now found and being restored in Charleston), both of which were powered by men using cranks. Captain Nemo's men had some electricity, but the motors were run by something that wasn't quite explained.
Jeff
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pierre View PostIsn´t it sufficient with the "explanations" given by the attackers "Henry Flower", "David Orsam" and "GUT"?
Henry has, of course, nailed it. And when Pierre saw that one of the characters in the play was Sir Thomas White, the Lord Mayor of London, he realised he had found was the conclusive proof he was looking for.
Queen Mary, Princess Elizabeth and the Lord Mayor all in one play!! It could only mean one thing. Gogmagog is Jack the Ripper!
Comment
-
Originally posted by David Orsam View PostI, for one, haven't put forward any explanation so this remark is very strange. Obviously Pierre is just evading a simple, reasonable and polite question.
Henry has, of course, nailed it. And when Pierre saw that one of the characters in the play was Sir Thomas White, the Lord Mayor of London, he realised he had found was the conclusive proof he was looking for.
Queen Mary, Princess Elizabeth and the Lord Mayor all in one play!! It could only mean one thing. Gogmagog is Jack the Ripper!
Comment
-
Originally posted by David Orsam View PostI, for one, haven't put forward any explanation so this remark is very strange. Obviously Pierre is just evading a simple, reasonable and polite question.
Henry has, of course, nailed it. And when Pierre saw that one of the characters in the play was Sir Thomas White, the Lord Mayor of London, he realised he had found was the conclusive proof he was looking for.
Queen Mary, Princess Elizabeth and the Lord Mayor all in one play!! It could only mean one thing. Gogmagog is Jack the Ripper!
I still wish he'd explain how he came across that idiotic play!
Jeff
Comment
-
Hi All,
When Sir Thomas White (1492–1567) was Lord Mayor [1553], the Lord Mayor's Show was held on 29th October.
After Britain adopted the Gregorian calendar in 1751, the date of the Lord Mayor's Show was changed to 9th November.
Regards,
SimonNever believe anything until it has been officially denied.
Comment
-
Despite Pierre claiming not to have mixed up his Marys, this is what he posted on 14 November 2015 in the thread 'Social Class of Jack the Ripper', while discussing the Gogmagog letter:
"...when you understand his hint at Tennyson, you can see why he posed the body of Mary Jane the way he did."
So Pierre was saying that when you understand that Tennyson was the author of 'Queen Mary' you can understand the pose of MJK, even though the pose he was referring to was in a portrait of Mary, Queen of Scots.
Comment
-
Originally posted by David Orsam View PostDespite Pierre claiming not to have mixed up his Marys, this is what he posted on 14 November 2015 in the thread 'Social Class of Jack the Ripper', while discussing the Gogmagog letter:
"...when you understand his hint at Tennyson, you can see why he posed the body of Mary Jane the way he did."
So Pierre was saying that when you understand that Tennyson was the author of 'Queen Mary' you can understand the pose of MJK, even though the pose he was referring to was in a portrait of Mary, Queen of Scots.
Comment
-
Mayerling, sir, I got distracted by the presence of the irritant Pierre, but I did intend to say what an enjoyable thread this has been. This is one of those side-streets off the man thoroughfare that makes Ripperology sometimes a real pleasure.
I was also interested to read more on the Phoenix Park assassination by The Invincibles, reference to which crops up repeatedly throughout my favourite novel, Joyce's Ulysses.
Many thanks sir.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Henry Flower View PostMayerling, sir, I got distracted by the presence of the irritant Pierre, but I did intend to say what an enjoyable thread this has been. This is one of those side-streets off the man thoroughfare that makes Ripperology sometimes a real pleasure.
I was also interested to read more on the Phoenix Park assassination by The Invincibles, reference to which crops up repeatedly throughout my favourite novel, Joyce's Ulysses.
Many thanks sir.
Jeff
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Mayerling View PostSilly GUT, I can't. I don't know the secret of the power for the motors of the "Nautilus" (Verne and "Nemo's" "Nautilus", not the actual one that is now at Groton's Submarine museum in Connecticut, which I have visited - that's a nuclear powered one). '
The limits to my knowledge of how to power pre-Holland and Lake subs is that of the U.S.S. Turtle (Bushnell's Revolutionary craft), and the C.S.S. Hunley (now found and being restored in Charleston), both of which were powered by men using cranks. Captain Nemo's men had some electricity, but the motors were run by something that wasn't quite explained.
JeffG U T
There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Comment
-
Comment