Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Irritations

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Enigma View Post
    Why did the Personnel Department become Human Resources? In my working days I resented being classified as a resource rather than as a loyal member of staff.
    Our work calls it the 'People Team' and somehow that just sounds even worse.

    There is just not a nice name for these generally vile people.

    Even so, I think I'd go with 'Team for Before the Company Hires Lawyers They Hire Us.'
    O have you seen the devle
    with his mikerscope and scalpul
    a lookin at a Kidney
    With a slide cocked up.

    Comment


    • 'Halloween is for children.'

      Women proceed to wear the sluttiest costumes going.



      O have you seen the devle
      with his mikerscope and scalpul
      a lookin at a Kidney
      With a slide cocked up.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
        i know im gonna get lambasted for this but ive always liked oasis. theyre a big hot mess, alot of songs are nice little pop ditties with many verging on the rawer side, fighting brothers, huge band at one point.etc

        plus i liked other bands from the genre including blur. it was all just a tad different, maybe the allure of something a little new.

        their stuff is nothing groundbreaking but at least they are interesting.

        however imho they and most other contemp bands way pale in comparison to the main new(ish) genre at the time... Grunge, which imho was the last great genre of rock.

        Amen on that last sentence
        " Still it is an error to argue in front of your data. You find yourself insensibly twisting them round to fit your theories."
        Sherlock Holmes
        ​​​​​

        Comment


        • Furthermore Abby, Champagne Supernova is just legit still to this day...
          " Still it is an error to argue in front of your data. You find yourself insensibly twisting them round to fit your theories."
          Sherlock Holmes
          ​​​​​

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Tani View Post
            'Halloween is for children.'

            Women proceed to wear the sluttiest costumes going.


            You make that seem like a negative thing, Tani.

            c.d.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by c.d. View Post

              You make that seem like a negative thing, Tani.

              c.d.
              Regardless, I don't think they should do it around children
              O have you seen the devle
              with his mikerscope and scalpul
              a lookin at a Kidney
              With a slide cocked up.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

                That’s a jaw-dropper Roger. Let’s hope that some disaster befalls this guy before he meets his next victim. The Judge and jury should be ashamed of themselves. There should be a re-trial and an inquiry.
                Hi Mike.

                I probably should have posted this 'irritant' elsewhere, but I didn't think it was worthy of its own thread.

                I don't want to criticize the prosecution, because I fully understand and agree with their concern, but it could be that they overreached and charged Prussak with more serious crimes than could be definitively proven. But it is indeed jaw dropping that the jury thew out all of it and didn't find him guilty of at least the lesser charges.

                I hope this is the last we hear of him, but I shudder to think that it won't be. Having read a lot of 'true crime,' leniency or avoidance of justice only tends to embolden a certain type of offender, if offender he intended to be.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by rjpalmer View Post

                  Hi Mike.

                  I probably should have posted this 'irritant' elsewhere, but I didn't think it was worthy of its own thread.

                  I don't want to criticize the prosecution, because I fully understand and agree with their concern, but it could be that they overreached and charged Prussak with more serious crimes than could be definitively proven. But it is indeed jaw dropping that the jury thew out all of it and didn't find him guilty of at least the lesser charges.

                  I hope this is the last we hear of him, but I shudder to think that it won't be. Having read a lot of 'true crime,' leniency or avoidance of justice only tends to embolden a certain type of offender, if offender he intended to be.
                  Hi Roger,

                  I completely agree. Did this creep have OJ’s Legal Team behind him? Let’s hope that in a few years time when they’re finding bodies you don’t have reason to post a link to post number 176 of this thread.
                  Regards

                  Sir Herlock Sholmes.

                  “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

                  Comment


                  • Did I already say I HATE these?? Attached lids!!
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	image.png
Views:	107
Size:	45.4 KB
ID:	843261
                    O have you seen the devle
                    with his mikerscope and scalpul
                    a lookin at a Kidney
                    With a slide cocked up.

                    Comment


                    • Yes, me too Tani. I cut them off.
                      Regards

                      Sir Herlock Sholmes.

                      “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

                      Comment


                      • You guys do realize that they just twist off, there not hard . Just a helpful hint.


                        Oops sorry GIrl/ Guy.
                        'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman

                        Comment


                        • How am I meant to pay upfront for a phone?

                          Who can pay 1.5k for a phone?

                          I want to own my things, not rent them ffs. Everything we own is not really owned, we're constantly paying for it. It's ridiculous. I want to pay for everything upfront and just... have it
                          Last edited by Tani; 12-02-2024, 02:54 PM.
                          O have you seen the devle
                          with his mikerscope and scalpul
                          a lookin at a Kidney
                          With a slide cocked up.

                          Comment


                          • Phone prices are insane Tani. I’ve never owned a new phone tbh and the most I’ve payed was for my current one which was £200 and I cried for a week after paying that.
                            Regards

                            Sir Herlock Sholmes.

                            “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

                            Comment


                            • UK gov now considers porridge junk food and has banned porridge adverts for children
                              O have you seen the devle
                              with his mikerscope and scalpul
                              a lookin at a Kidney
                              With a slide cocked up.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X