Election

[caz]

Wrong thread? - that is a Christeresque cop out. So since you can't answer what the differences are in those examples I'll take that I've been wrongly accused of racism etc. The fact of the matter is making observations (akin to the ones I did) are not racist, xenophobic or Islamophobic. The fact is Tab threw out the insults wrongly. If I'd made another observation that did not include 'brown skin' 'white skin' if would have gone unnoticed. Just because someone mentions 'brown skin' does not make the comment racist and to think so it bloody ignorant.

Just for the record I've just seem an African man walk down the street, he was wearing a cream suit and a very shiny pair of shoes. <--- racist or not?

I have not accused you of racism, Geddy. Get over it, or redirect your 'victim card' observations accordingly.

Thank you.

[The Rookie Detective]

Religions don't have sex with young girls, explode bombs or terrorise people. Individuals do, and some use religion as an excuse, while others do not. They are all evil.

I think that's something everyone can agree on - unless they are the ones doing these things, or would like the chance.

I fear evil in all its forms, but that's not a phobia. It's called being normal.

The best post on this thread by far.


RD

[caz]

I'm against ANY religion having sex with young girls, exploding bombs or terrorising people in general. I suspect most folk are. Does that make them xyz a phobic?

Religions don't have sex with young girls, explode bombs or terrorise people. Individuals do, and some use religion as an excuse, while others do not. They are all evil.

I think that's something everyone can agree on - unless they are the ones doing these things, or would like the chance.

I fear evil in all its forms, but that's not a phobia. It's called being normal.

[caz]

We must also remember that Jesus's mother Mary was only 14 when she conceived.

Or was it God who...

Anyway...

At the time being 14 would have been considered normal of course; but if we take that and apply it to today's morals...

...That perhaps explains why there are so many evil paedophiles in the Catholic Church that are protected by the organisation run by powerful privileged white men who use the church as a shield to know they're above the law.

So at least we have established that perhaps Muhammed, Joseph and possibly even God are dodgy, for having their way with underage girls.

But I do see your point how SOME young Muslim men do feel they can treat women like dirt; the same can be applied to those scumbag Romans who raped their way across Europe.
The Romans treated women just as bad, and became even worse when they adopted Christianity with Emperor Constantine.

The Catholic Church is now of course the last remnant of the Roman Empire (Eastern)

In direct opposition of course to many non-Christian British tribes (like the Iceni) who had women as the head ruler. In Britain some women were seen as Goddesses; a concept completely alien to the Christians and Muslims.


Religion has raped the world.


And continues to do so.


RD

There was a young lady from Nod,
Who wanted a baby from God.
It wasn't the Almighty who crept up her nightie,
But the vicar, the dirty old sod.

I thank you.

In Spain, the age of consent was 12 from 1870 to 1999, when it changed to 13, and was finally raised to 16 in 2015.

Might we have won the Euros if they hadn't raised it, I wonder?

Love,

Caz
X

[caz]

It may have escaped your attention, but laws are not written to protect you from the majority of people, they are written to protect you from the exception.
Not everyone carries a gun, but in rare cases, someone will.
Not everyone races around at 100 MPH, occasionally, someone will.
Not everyone forces a juvenile to have sex, but occasionally, someone will.
Laws are put in place to protect the individual from the unexpected.

In that case, which lavatory does the law require a predatory lesbian to use? Or a predatory gay man?

[The Rookie Detective]

In fact; unless a person has dark skin and lives in East Africa, and who's ancestral lineage all derive from the same location; then the chances are that you're not a pure "homo-sapien" human being.

If you're white, then your ancestors at some point interbred with Neanderthals; who were a completely different species.

In other words; unless you're an authentic black East African, then you're a hybrid of multiple species and not a pure blood human being Homo Sapien at all.


And every single human being is descended from a woman who lived in East Africa; meaning that whether you like it or not; you're descended from a Black African woman.

Africa; the ancestral birthplace of humanity; quite literally.


And that is a beautiful thing



RD

[The Rookie Detective]

RD.

I had to return to this, it is commonly accepted there are four varieties of racism, though I accept as society changes we might be adding more in the future.

- Interpersonal.
- Institutional.
- Internalized.
- Structural.

Interracial does not mean black against black, or Muslim against Muslim.
It means Asian against African, in other words, one colour against another colour.

https://www.kjzz.org/2020-11-05/content-1633343-asu-professor-explains-interracial-racism-and-history-between-asian-and-black

Contrary to what the other poster thinks, if an Arab (Muslim) can be racist towards another Arab (Muslim), then Christians (White) can be racist towards another Christian (White), which is ludicrous.
When you have objections towards a person of the same colour, then it isn't racism.
You might choose 'Bigot', because you disagree with their "unreasonable" views, but then who decides what is "reasonable"?

The term "interracial" has been borrowed from "interracial marriage", and then misapplied.

However; Race isn't just based on "Black or White," its based on a combination of culture and ethnicity.

An albino Kenyan would still be culturally and ethnically a black Kenyan; but would have white skin.

Its a populist human construct to segregate and label race as either Black, White or Asian.
Those generalised labels are contradictory, derogatory, and do not accurately reflect what Race someone actually is.


RD

[Wickerman]

... There were Jewish members of the nazi party as well.

Not a good example, Jews knew their fate if they did not do what they were told.
With a gun to your head, wouldn't you bury your sympathies?

That aside, today there are Jews supporting the Hamas led pro-palestine protestors, but again that is not ethnic, it is polical.

[Wickerman]

I never said or suggested anything of the kind. Self-loathing is a thing.

"Self-loathing" is you hating yourself.

The term is a strong hint as to the meaning.

[Wickerman]

Countries with the lowest percentages of Muslim population

Tokelau	1,893	0%	0%
Niue	1,935	0%	0%
Falkland Islands	3,791	0%	0%
Wallis And Futuna	11,502	0%	0%
Nauru	12,780	0%	0%
Cook Islands	17,044	0%	0%
Palau	18,058	0%	0%
San Marino	33,642	0%	0%
Marshall Islands	41,996	0%	0%

For those who find it difficult to live with fundamentalists muslims and consume Halal meat, those are some places they should focus on in the coming 171 years, migration!
The Baron

I don't think they'll be around in 50 years - they'll be under water - Climate Change.

[Wickerman]

Interacial racism does exist.

Racism knows many forms.

RD.

I had to return to this, it is commonly accepted there are four varieties of racism, though I accept as society changes we might be adding more in the future.

- Interpersonal.
- Institutional.
- Internalized.
- Structural.

Interracial does not mean black against black, or Muslim against Muslim.
It means Asian against African, in other words, one colour against another colour.

https://www.kjzz.org/2020-11-05/content-1633343-asu-professor-explains-interracial-racism-and-history-between-asian-and-black

Contrary to what the other poster thinks, if an Arab (Muslim) can be racist towards another Arab (Muslim), then Christians (White) can be racist towards another Christian (White), which is ludicrous.
When you have objections towards a person of the same colour, then it isn't racism.
You might choose 'Bigot', because you disagree with their "unreasonable" views, but then who decides what is "reasonable"?

The term "interracial" has been borrowed from "interracial marriage", and then misapplied.

[Herlock Sholmes]

“For those who find it difficult to live with fundamentalists muslims.”


You mean women, gays, Jews, atheists…

[The Baron]

Countries with the lowest percentages of Muslim population

Tokelau	1,893	0%	0%
Niue	1,935	0%	0%
Falkland Islands	3,791	0%	0%
Wallis And Futuna	11,502	0%	0%
Nauru	12,780	0%	0%
Cook Islands	17,044	0%	0%
Palau	18,058	0%	0%
San Marino	33,642	0%	0%
Marshall Islands	41,996	0%	0%

For those who find it difficult to live with fundamentalists muslims and consume Halal meat, those are some places they should focus on in the coming 171 years, migration!



The Baron

[Wickerman]

I forget what the source was. Care to remind us?

https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/uk-public-opinion-toward-immigration-overall-attitudes-and-level-of-concern/

[Wickerman]

I never said or suggested anything of the kind. Self-loathing is a thing...

What you pointed out was black people came out against BLM protesters.

The objection was to the political views (Wokery) of the BLM, not their skin colour.

Therefore, you believe black objectors accused other black protestors of being racist, based on their political views.