Trump charged

[Al Bundy's Eyes]

I feel suitably silenced, and will thus leave. I think it's been a mostly civil thread. When the counter revolution comes I promise most posters on this thread will be amongst the very last to be taken around the wall and shot.

Cheers Jason, very considerate. Any chance of a ten minute running head start on a bid for freedom? There's a gold watch in it

[Svensson]

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

·6h


A Large, Complex, Detailed but Irrefutable REPORT on the Presidential Election Fraud which took place in Georgia is almost complete & will be presented by me at a major News Conference at 11:00 A.M. on Monday of next week in Bedminster, New Jersey. Based on the results of this CONCLUSIVE Report, all charges should be dropped against me & others - There will be a complete EXONERATION! They never went after those that Rigged the Election. They only went after those that fought to find the RIGGERS!

[jason_c]

I feel suitably silenced, and will thus leave. I think it's been a mostly civil thread. When the counter revolution comes I promise most posters on this thread will be amongst the very last to be taken around the wall and shot.

[Pcdunn]

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cv80HoeO1fd/?igshid=NjZiM2M3MzIxNA==

Robert Reich offers five facts to discount ideas that DJT is getting "victimized" by a "two-tiered justice system" and having his "freedom of speech violated", and so forth. All incorrect statements.

[String]

To lighten things up:

CNN: TRUMP INDICTED
MSNBC: TRUMP INDICTED
CSPAN: TRUMP INDICTED
The Weather Channel: TRUMP INDICTED
Fox News: Is Hunter Biden really a hunter?

[Admin]

We are making an executive decision because we are tired of the bullshit. Don't defend Trump or his ilk, on our platform any more.

You've been warned. Go elsewhere with the Trump support. This is not the place for it. Defending Trump after January 6 makes me lose all respect for you as a person and I don't want my bias to interfere with how I might just randomly decide to boot you out of my existence.

[Svensson]

I shall leave it at this, Jason, You live in a fantasy world created by right-wing nonsense devoid of logic or facts. And I hope for your and your family's sake that you eventually come out on the other side.

All the best.

[jason_c]

Alan Dershowitz: 'if you are prosecuting someone who is a frontrunner for the Presidential race you better bring the strongest case otherwise it looks like a banana republic'.

Dershowitz also says RICO cases have the highest chances of quick prosecutorial success but also the highest chances of being thrown out on appeal. Of course the ultimate SCOTUS appeal will be years away. However, it's job done by then as Trump would be approaching his mid 80's and unlikely to run again. It's all election interference at this point.

[String]

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-witness-tampering-b2392947.html

[jason_c]

so if her statements are correct, then surely she is biased towards the truth, no?

That's a mighty big if. However, she should not have brought up Trump's incarceration status if she wished to appear neutral on the issue of Trump's incarceration. It was uncalled for from someone in her position.

[jason_c]

as opposed to Donald Trump, right? Because that one is not beyond dispute.

I think you'll find every billionaire has foreign business interests, otherwise they wouldn't be billionaires.

[Svensson]

I have made no issue over the accuracy(or lack thereof) of her comments. I said she was biased.

so if her statements are correct, then surely she is biased towards the truth, no?

[Svensson]

'no foreign business money went directly into my personal chequing account'.

as opposed to Donald Trump, right? Because that one is not beyond dispute.

[jason_c]

Whataboutery again. Always deflecting.

You call it whataboutery, I call it maintaining any reputation the US justice system has of good practice and impartiality. A justice system cannot survive if half the public have no confidence in it.

[String]

Svensson, as far as I know none of your 4 points are substantiated. They are oft repeated allegations but nothing close to definitive evidence.

As for Biden's corruption. Earlier in this thread you seemingly admitted that Washington ran on access and influence, not all deals are texted or spoken in stark terms of 'if you do this, I'll pay you that'. It's invariably more subtle than that. Numerous members of the Biden family seem to have received money(offshore accounts, shell companies etc) from firms in Ukraine and China, it goes beyond simply Biden's son and brother. However, because the money is NOT going straight into Joe chequing account then there is not corruption. We do have a text from Hunter that he is paying for many of Joe's living expenses. I'd also like to know who the 'big guy' is if it's not Joe Biden?

Whataboutery again. Always deflecting.