why so quiet

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Robert
    Commissioner
    • Feb 2008
    • 5163

    #16
    New people do join, and they want to discuss things, which is the best way of learning. Some discussions might seem repetitive to us old fogeys, but it's the first time for the newbies, so good luck to them and I hope they enjoy it. I know I did.

    Comment

    • Stephen Thomas
      Chief Inspector
      • Feb 2008
      • 1728

      #17
      Originally posted by Robert View Post
      New people do join, and they want to discuss things, which is the best way of learning. Some discussions might seem repetitive to us old fogeys, but it's the first time for the newbies, so good luck to them and I hope they enjoy it. I know I did.
      What a lovely chap that Robert bloke is. And he understands Latin too .
      allisvanityandvexationofspirit

      Comment

      • lynn cates
        Commisioner
        • Aug 2009
        • 13841

        #18
        blender

        Hello CD.

        "Dead horses can only be beaten so much."

        True. My old professor once said, "I don't mind beating a dead horse--but don't stick him in the blender."

        Cheers.
        LC

        Comment

        • Rob Clack
          Inactive
          • Feb 2008
          • 1708

          #19
          A couple of reasons why I hardly post anymore is that there is a lot of repitition, which don't have a problem with as we were all newbies once. But the main reason I hardly post is that there are several people new to the case (about 5 to 10 years) who seem to think that people who have studied the case for decades are wrong. That what they have learnt and read over the decades is wrong and these new people are only posting to put us right and its only there opinion that matters and they are never wrong.
          I try not to get involved in these debates as I would be have to be rude. And that's not like me.
          Thankfully I am in a postion where I don't give a toss about them and I still have a few friends I can debate with in a sensible manner and have no ego to bruise.

          Its only Roberts humour that keeps the boards sane and worth reading.

          Rob

          Comment

          • Graham
            Assistant Commissioner
            • Feb 2008
            • 3813

            #20
            Well said, Rob. I couldn't agree more.

            Graham
            We are suffering from a plethora of surmise, conjecture and hypothesis. - Sherlock Holmes, The Adventure Of Silver Blaze

            Comment

            • Rob Clack
              Inactive
              • Feb 2008
              • 1708

              #21
              Thanks Graham.

              Rob

              Comment

              • Sally
                Superintendent
                • Sep 2010
                • 2100

                #22
                People come and go ( some vocally, some not ). That's how it goes. It is quiet right now, but it probably won't last. And people have lives, you know? Yes, there are some to whom posting here is plainly very important and integral to their existence: but for the rest of us, its a hobby - not to say it isn't a serious interest to many posters - but a pastime nonetheless. Sometimes I guess real life takes precedence.

                I generally read the boards, even if I don't have time to get involved in debate right now. Its a good site, always interesting.

                Comment

                • Scott Nelson
                  Superintendent
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 2409

                  #23
                  Well let's just try and liven things up a bit, shall we?

                  Comment

                  • Ginger
                    Sergeant
                    • Jan 2012
                    • 780

                    #24
                    Originally posted by Damaso Marte View Post
                    I'm relatively new to the board, and I'm surprised by how much vitriol there is between some of the established posters.
                    I'll admit that this has deterred me from taking part in several otherwise interesting discussions.
                    - Ginger

                    Comment

                    • richardnunweek
                      Superintendent
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 2420

                      #25
                      Hi,
                      Well there we go folks , the thread has at least got dormant feelings expressed, and has got the most posts of the day to boot.
                      As Scott suggested lets liven things up a bit , how about all of us stating a debatable thread to kick start the weekend?
                      Regards Richard.

                      Comment

                      • Simon Wood
                        Commissioner
                        • Feb 2008
                        • 5552

                        #26
                        Hi Ginger,

                        Most newbie questions were addressed long ago [check out Casebook's voluminous archive], so the subject has become one not to be entered into lightly or ill-prepared.

                        And, as most good lawyers will advise, never ask a question until you know [or believe you know to the very best of your knowledge] the answer.

                        Regards,

                        Simon
                        Last edited by Simon Wood; 09-12-2013, 11:40 AM. Reason: spolling mistook
                        Never believe anything until it has been officially denied.

                        Comment

                        • Ginger
                          Sergeant
                          • Jan 2012
                          • 780

                          #27
                          Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
                          And, as most good lawyers will advise, never ask a question until you know [or believe you know to the very best of your knowledge] the answer.
                          That's good advice for an adversarial debate, where you're trying to sway onlookers by making your opponent look uninformed or dishonest. It's a rather less useful strategy for the type of debate and argument that's intended to test the truth of competing hypotheses, which is what I had expected to encounter here.
                          - Ginger

                          Comment

                          • robhouse
                            Inspector
                            • Feb 2008
                            • 1222

                            #28
                            The reason I don't post much is that I am of the opinion that the lunatics have taken over the asylum.

                            RH

                            Comment

                            • Steve S
                              Casebook Supporter
                              • Jun 2008
                              • 378

                              #29
                              I look every couple of days....Notice a 10-page thread dominated by about four people who will never agree.....and go away..........

                              Comment

                              • lynn cates
                                Commisioner
                                • Aug 2009
                                • 13841

                                #30
                                liven things up

                                Hello Scott.

                                "Well let's just try and liven things up a bit, shall we?"

                                Sure. Try yet another Liz Stride thread or perhaps a Toppy.

                                Cheers.
                                LC

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X