I'll use Trapperology as an example. Science waded in and said categorically that the teeth and tissue analysis indicates the unidentified Mad Trapper of Rat River was raised in the American cornbelt because he had a high corn diet and his teeth put him there too or Northern Scandinavia. I think I was blinded by the science which is not yet on a par with fingerprints and DNA but eventually I abandoned it and my suspect doesn't fit any of those parameters.
As for the male/female thing, I was using "feminine/masculine" as traditional characteristics as the clearest way I see to define approaches which can be used by either gender. I don't see one as a pejorative or either as superior. Ultimately the more active and persistent approach leads to more success landing on the side of that approach, just by the odds even if it's just blind dumb luck.
As for the male/female thing, I was using "feminine/masculine" as traditional characteristics as the clearest way I see to define approaches which can be used by either gender. I don't see one as a pejorative or either as superior. Ultimately the more active and persistent approach leads to more success landing on the side of that approach, just by the odds even if it's just blind dumb luck.
Comment