Woman Fired For Not Wearing Makeup To Work

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hatchett
    replied
    Hello Ally,

    "The Great Hatchett!"

    Well, thank you very much.

    I didnt know that you cared.

    Best wishes.

    Leave a comment:


  • cappuccina
    replied
    I'm with you, Robert!

    Lipstick = Yes...It's nice - quick and easy to apply, you can soften your look and bring out colors in your complexion, clothes, etc....

    Lipliner = No...It's a pain in the ***!

    Leave a comment:


  • Robert
    replied
    Blimey!

    Leave a comment:


  • cappuccina
    replied
    This stuff:


    I use lipstick regularly, but have NO patience for lip liner!

    Leave a comment:


  • Robert
    replied
    Hmmm. It sounds as though Captain Peacock took a stroll round and got rather strict.

    What the hell is lip liner?

    Leave a comment:


  • johns
    replied
    She doesn't even need any make up

    Leave a comment:


  • cappuccina
    replied
    LMAO.......Not to worry, I'll visit all three establishments!

    Leave a comment:


  • The Good Michael
    replied
    Originally posted by cappuccina View Post
    Can the name of said establishment, regardless of what it sells, be "The Vienna Sausage Kitchen"???
    Visit that place if you wish. Me? I'll be working at the Kielbasa Korner, next to the Bratwurst Brasserie.

    Mike

    Leave a comment:


  • cappuccina
    replied
    Originally posted by Ally View Post
    I'd love to shop in a store staffed by hot naked guys. It would be like disney world for adults. You know men have been using hot chicks to cater to male tastes for a while, Hooters, tilted kilt, etc.

    I think it's about time girls got on board and started making men wear next to nothing and serve us.
    Can the name of said establishment, regardless of what it sells, be "The Vienna Sausage Kitchen"???

    Leave a comment:


  • Stephen Thomas
    replied
    As the old saying goes, who pays the piper calls the tune.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ally
    replied
    Originally posted by Hatchett View Post
    Hi Ally,

    Is this a spelling test? Or are we at the stage when decisions are made by the notice of typo's?

    Best wishes
    You know I set you up so nicely for this response, and then I missed it in my back and forth with Michael. But I do want to thank you for being predictably led to water.

    So, once again in a blatant display of do as I say not as I do, it's apparently perfectly okay for Hatchett to criticize the nature, tone and presentation of someone's argument rather than the meat, but god forbid, he gets the treatment in kind.

    Phony. Pretentious. Typical.

    Originally posted by Hatchett View Post
    Hello Michael,

    Do you specialise in making tedius remarks, when you cannot respond sensibly?

    I mean do you study, or does it come naturally to you?


    Best wishes.
    Originally posted by Hatchett View Post
    Hello Ally,

    Are you sure that you shouldn't be contributing to the God thread, because that last remark seems to assume that you have replaced him.

    .

    Much as I appreciate you thinking me cute and adorable, I do have to say that trying to belittle and question someone's motives in replying to a post is hardly a mature and serious exercise.

    In fact, it also borders on the serious questioning of someone's integrety.

    Yes, let's not belittle anyone, unless of course you are the great Hatchett. Then it's always perfectly acceptable.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Good Michael
    replied
    Originally posted by Ally View Post
    No, no no! don't you understand? Being required to wear a kilt is victimization!
    Oh yeah...mmmm, I will quit then! They can't make me do that. I'm an American citizen. Besides, immigrants will take my job at a lower wage and will wear kilts. I can collect unemployment. You see, that's where all the dole money goes. To those of us who refuse to work under such deplorable conditions as, as... as having to actually work.

    Mike

    Leave a comment:


  • Ally
    replied
    It would be the same if I were required to wear a kilt at my job. I can choose to leave the place or wear the kilt. (between you and me, I kind of dig kilts).

    No, no no! don't you understand? Being required to wear a kilt is victimization! You must get a lawyer and sue the company for daring to attempt to make their employees dress how they want them to.

    Get on the victim train my good man. No one but you has any rights in the world.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Good Michael
    replied
    Ally,

    Would you be only window shopping? Call me odd, but I can't go into a place like Hooters, nor into any place where women are scantily clad (a public place, I mean). I don't deal with objectification very well. I understand that it's a choice and it may be part of the rules of a place. I choose not to be involved, however. It would be the same if I were required to wear a kilt at my job. I can choose to leave the place or wear the kilt. (between you and me, I kind of dig kilts).

    Mike

    Leave a comment:


  • Ally
    replied
    Originally posted by The Good Michael View Post
    How did naked people get to work at Harrod's? That's kind of cool. They wear make-up I presume? Naked people without make-up would scare customers away.

    Mike
    I'd love to shop in a store staffed by hot naked guys. It would be like disney world for adults. You know men have been using hot chicks to cater to male tastes for a while, Hooters, tilted kilt, etc.

    I think it's about time girls got on board and started making men wear next to nothing and serve us.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X