Originally posted by jason_c
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
UN authorises military action against Gaddafi
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Chris View PostI suspect that whatever facts and arguments you present, it will still turn out to be simultaneously (1) all our fault and (2) none of our business ...
I notice not one word about the 150,000 innocent civilians who perished during the war with Iraq.
The silence is deafening.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chris View PostI suspect that whatever facts and arguments you present, it will still turn out to be simultaneously (1) all our fault and (2) none of our business ...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Natalie Severn View Post
We did and have done business with Gadaffi---don"t try to duck out of it by referring to everybody else who has.There is a word for it,Complicity.
I notice not one word about the 150,000 innocent civilians who perished during the war with Iraq.
The silence is deafening.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Natalie Severn View PostI notice not one word about the 150,000 innocent civilians who perished during the war with Iraq.
The silence is deafening.
But how is Iraq an argument for standing aside and letting Gaddafi butcher his victims, if we can do something to prevent it?
Comment
-
Why the double standard?
Originally posted by jason_c View PostI ignored them just as you ignore Saddam Husseins victims.
Why are we standing by,right now, letting the Yemen president kill his own people?Is it because there is no oil in Yemen?
Why are we standing by watching the Bahrain King crush the protests of his people?
The Arab league is a collection of corrupt kings and dictatorships---none of whom want to support protesters wishing for freedom and democracy.Might not the establishment of "no fly zones "be in their interests?
Btw £15 billion is invested in Libya by the big oil companies BP and others.Its a bit of a give away to say the least.Last edited by Natalie Severn; 03-21-2011, 01:55 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Natalie Severn View PostWhy particularly Sadam Hussein? Why not any other dictatorship in the Middle East? or the outskirts of Russia for example Uzbekistan? Why not Burma?
Why are we standing by,right now, letting the Yemen president kill his own people?Is it because there is no oil in Yemen?
Why are we standing by watching the Bahrain King crush the protests of his people?
The Arab league is a collection of corrupt kings and dictatorships---none of whom want to support protesters wishing for freedom and democracy.Might not the establishment of "no fly zones "be in their interests?
Btw £15 billion is invested in Libya by the big oil companies BP and others.Its a bit of a give away to say the least.
The collection of corrupt regimes in the region will be watching nervously the recent events in North Africa. These movements towards democracy will have a wildfire effect in the region if they succeed. In an ideal world the most aggressive authoritarian regimes will go first(Iran, Syria). In an not ideal world we may have to help them fall.
It may end up happily, or it may still end in chaos.
Comment
-
If you're going to say that America should only get into wars where we are physically attacked first then the only wars we would have been in were WWII Pacific Theater and the War on Terror. The Civil War also perhaps if you count Sumter.Last edited by sdreid; 03-21-2011, 05:02 PM.This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.
Stan Reid
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Good Michael View PostStan
We have a real war on mosquitoes in Minnesota, but it's possible we began with pre-emptive strikes.
Mike
ChrisChristopher T. George
Organizer, RipperCon #JacktheRipper-#True Crime Conference
just held in Baltimore, April 7-8, 2018.
For information about RipperCon, go to http://rippercon.com/
RipperCon 2018 talks can now be heard at http://www.casebook.org/podcast/
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chris View PostI wish you'd give the sanctimony a rest for a bit. I opposed the war in Iraq just as you did.
But how is Iraq an argument for standing aside and letting Gaddafi butcher his victims, if we can do something to prevent it?
Who actually started this uprising in Libya?
The media here in Britain made it look like another Tunisia/Egypt type popular uprising but is that really the truth.
About week after it started 8 or so members of the British Special Air Service (SAS) were caught by Libyans. The SAS were sent in by the British Government and it ended in complete disarray.
How much other foreign interference has been going on there recently and who has Gaddaffi's supporters actually been fighting against.
We now know that they are fighting against NATO.
Why aren't WE going into Indonesia, Burma, Zimbabwe, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain et al who all have dreadful human rights records to name but a very few.
We love our dictators when they do what they are told...we bomb them when they step out of line.
Derrick
Comment
-
Originally posted by Derrick View PostWho actually started this uprising in Libya?
The media here in Britain made it look like another Tunisia/Egypt type popular uprising but is that really the truth.
Comment
Comment