Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Use of apostrophe's

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Use of apostrophe's

    Thread for the discussion of the use of apostrophes.

  • #2
    Apostrophes are only used where there is something (i.e. letter(s)) missing.

    Drives me mad to see it's when it should be its or MP's which should be MPs grrrrrrrrr

    Comment


    • #3
      Are you a grocer or a wind-up merchant, Chris?

      Love,

      Caz
      X
      "Comedy is simply a funny way of being serious." Peter Ustinov


      Comment


      • #4
        They indicate possession too... as in "Fred's hat"

        Comment


        • #5
          I apologise for the error in the title of the thread. How careless of me. And how ironic!

          But I'm still convinced that correcting peoples' use of apostrophes is the last refuge of a scoundrel.

          Comment


          • #6
            Hi Chris,

            The trouble with you is that it's hard to tell when you're joking. It's not like you to make silly mistakes. But it's even less like you to be funny.

            It would take a scoundrel with rather more time than I have to correct entire peoples' apostrophe usage. Where would one start? The peoples of Europe and America perhaps?

            I'm limited to seeing people's usage on the message boards - and I almost always limit myself to correcting those who have just slagged someone else off for something far more serious.

            So think yourself lucky if your only fault is a misplaced apostrophe here and there. My many faults include being a scoundrel.

            Love,

            Caz
            X
            "Comedy is simply a funny way of being serious." Peter Ustinov


            Comment


            • #7
              Sit up straight boys and girls and pay attention to Miss

              allisvanityandvexationofspirit

              Comment


              • #8
                Oh my goodness, Miss is more of a scoundrel than I am, Stephen...

                "Using the scattergun approach simply displays a lack of education which may not be the writer's fault, and a lack of desire to find out, which is, and is ignorant."

                Ouch!

                Love,

                Caz
                X
                "Comedy is simply a funny way of being serious." Peter Ustinov


                Comment


                • #9
                  isnt that more of an arogance than an ignorance?
                  “be just and fear not”

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by caz View Post
                    It would take a scoundrel with rather more time than I have to correct entire peoples' apostrophe usage. Where would one start? The peoples of Europe and America perhaps?

                    I'm limited to seeing people's usage on the message boards - and I almost always limit myself to correcting those who have just slagged someone else off for something far more serious.
                    Thats more like it! I knew you wouldnt be able to resist.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Although I have sympathy with "Apostrophe Hitlers" and the like and I lean toward their way of thinking, I also think that English as a language is the most appalling mish mash of silly rules (which half the time aren't rules like "i before e") and random construction etc, that it's a wonder anyone can speak and write it correctly. On second thoughts, I would wager that not one single person on Earth uses English correctly all of the time.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        There is a remarkably thorough discussion of apostrophes in Wikipedia:

                        The article even deals with the "St James's" question that I raised on the original thread.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I reckon "its", meaning "belonging to it", should properly be rendered as "it's".

                          (just winding up Caz here).
                          allisvanityandvexationofspirit

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Did anyone attend the movie Sssssss' premier back in 1973? Ain't that right?
                            This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

                            Stan Reid

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Stephen Thomas View Post
                              I reckon "its", meaning "belonging to it", should properly be rendered as "it's".

                              (just winding up Caz here).
                              I agree.... this was a rule I just couldn't get my head round until the ex-missus (who is a grammar Nazi) drummed it into me one day by saying something along the lines of...

                              it is = it's
                              possessive apostrophe means something like "Fred's hat"
                              EXCEPT when you get "its hat"

                              which illustrates the lack of consistency that I've always struggled with in English.

                              I remember the "i before e except after c" rule being drummed into me at school (thank you Parkside Middle and North Bromsgrove High) and then me going on to spell "nieghbour" etc which do not follow this "rule" at all. According to Wikipedia which I've just had a wee look at, 66% of words using ie/ei are exceptions to this rule.... some f*ck*n rule that was then eh... twats!

                              I also think (therefore I'm right) that words ending in "s" should look like "Banks's Beer" not "Banks' Beer"

                              I drive 2 wee boys to and from school every day and to brighten up the 20 minute journey each way I've invented some "I spy" type games and so on which led to one of the boys asking about the apostrophe as we saw a "Mick's Van Hire" this one day.

                              I explained it well enough and he's happy.

                              A few days later we see "Banks' Trucking" or something and he wanted to know why there wasn't an "s" after the apostrophe.

                              I can't exactly remember what I said now but I basically tried to explain it with something like "there's not supposed to be 2 letter s with an apostrophe between them".
                              He thought it was silly. I think he's right and he's only 8.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X