Originally posted by Natalie Severn
View Post
LBC thinks it "of crucial importance" that the evidence of the sole survivor of a rural hostage taking lacks corroboration.
I say it's entirely expected, and attempts to cast doubt on the victim's account because of this are unwarranted.
Contamination , even back in 2002, was a recognised possibility.
Today the DNA LCN testing of 2002 and its reliability is becoming a different story entirely .
The Court rejects the possibility of contamination and accepted the prosecution’s submission that the DNA evidence, standing alone was, in fact, certain proof of James Hanratty’s guilt.
Vic.

Leave a comment: