Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mail's feature of 1999 on Hanratty by Roger Matthews

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Victor
    replied
    Originally posted by Natalie Severn View Post
    We know Hanratty was a small time crook but you appeared to implying the other day that France was not.
    Sorry Nats, you can go back and read what I said in post #177...
    France a petty criminal who killed himself because Hanratty had dragged him from the little league into the serious, vicious, nasty big boys game.
    I asked for evidence that France was anything more than a small time crook. You appeared to be saying France was bigger-time than Hanratty, when the opposite seems to be the case.

    KR,
    Vic.

    Leave a comment:


  • Natalie Severn
    replied
    Originally posted by Victor View Post
    Hi Nats,

    What are you attempting to do here? Dixie and Hanratty were close friends and associates. If you trying to make Dixie out to be more than a small time crook, then Hanratty gets tarred with the same brush. "Sauce for the goose" &tc.

    KR,
    Vic.
    We know Hanratty was a small time crook but you appeared to implying the other day that France was not.

    Leave a comment:


  • Natalie Severn
    replied
    Originally posted by Victor View Post
    Hi Nats,

    Well that's only true in the sense that her entire account was not corroborated, but large chunks of it have been.

    She was shot 5 times.
    She was raped (ejaculate was found in her underwear).
    Gregsten was shot dead.

    I doubt you'll find anyone who was the sole survivor after being taken hostage in a rural area, whose entire account is corroborated.

    KR,
    Vic.
    All true-but none of this is concrete proof that Hanratty had anything to do with it---let alone was the murderer .
    Contamination , even back in 2002, was a recognised possibility.Today the DNA LCN testing of 2002 and its reliability is becoming a different story entirely .

    Leave a comment:


  • Victor
    replied
    Originally posted by Natalie Severn View Post
    ...France had been sacked as a 'doorman' at the Rehearsal Club and also had connections to the 'Billiard Hall' in Great Windmill Street doing 'marking ' there is significant[also Page 146 of Foot] .
    Hi Nats,

    What are you attempting to do here? Dixie and Hanratty were close friends and associates. If you trying to make Dixie out to be more than a small time crook, then Hanratty gets tarred with the same brush. "Sauce for the goose" &tc.

    KR,
    Vic.

    Leave a comment:


  • Natalie Severn
    replied
    Originally posted by Victor View Post
    Hi Nats


    Well for a start, even Del-boy accepts that Hanratty blew his nose on the handkerchief that was discovered wrapped around the murder weapon. Several witnesses (including the victim) positively identified him. He stayed the night in the hotel room where cartridge cases from the murder weapon were found. He has no alibi that stands up to scrutiny. And his ejaculate was found in the victim's underwear.

    KR,
    Vic.
    Hi Vic,
    Only your final point still needs to be explained.The rest is disputed and/or circumstantial-not concrete.
    Last edited by Natalie Severn; 06-20-2014, 04:04 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Victor
    replied
    Originally posted by Natalie Severn View Post
    Of crucial importance to him [LBC] was Valerie's evidence ,whose sole account of what happened was never corroborated by anyone.
    Hi Nats,

    Well that's only true in the sense that her entire account was not corroborated, but large chunks of it have been.

    She was shot 5 times.
    She was raped (ejaculate was found in her underwear).
    Gregsten was shot dead.

    I doubt you'll find anyone who was the sole survivor after being taken hostage in a rural area, whose entire account is corroborated.

    KR,
    Vic.

    Leave a comment:


  • Victor
    replied
    Hi Nats,

    Originally posted by Natalie Severn View Post
    Victor ,regarding your post accusing me of 'smearing Valerie' I was simply quoting a legal expert analysing Valerie's entire testimony; Louis Blom-Cooper Blom -Cooper was in fact a distinguished barrister and legal commentator and he impugned the entirety of her testimony .Blom-Cooper analysed a number of points of evidence,demonstrating for example how totally ludicrous the 'roadworks' evidence was and stating,crucially ,that "Once Storie's evidence was discounted,the only other evidence was Langdale's-[who was a notorious prison grass.]*-from Bob Woffinden,Hanratty :The Final Verdict.
    I've got Blom-Cooper's book, which basically says the trial wasn't as clear and straightforward as it should have been, but the result was correct. LBC did flip-flop from guilty to innocent (with Foot's book) and back quite a lot.

    And I did correct the "smearing" suggestion to "unintentional splash-damage".

    Can we now have some 'concrete' evidence about Hanratty's role in the A6 murder rather than repeatedly smearing him and presenting us with your own prejudices and value judgements.
    Well for a start, even Del-boy accepts that Hanratty blew his nose on the handkerchief that was discovered wrapped around the murder weapon. Several witnesses (including the victim) positively identified him. He stayed the night in the hotel room where cartridge cases from the murder weapon were found. He has no alibi that stands up to scrutiny. And his ejaculate was found in the victim's underwear.

    KR,
    Vic.

    Leave a comment:


  • Natalie Severn
    replied
    Does anyone have a link to a text [ possibly in a the newspaper article or magazine] stating that William Ewer had business connections with Louise Anderson's shop in Soho ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Natalie Severn
    replied
    Originally posted by NickB View Post
    Defence investigators went to Rhyl after his photo taken on the 5th.
    Then you are absolutely right.So why there was such a delay?

    Leave a comment:


  • Natalie Severn
    replied
    The earlier reference I posted [now on previous page ] mentioning that France had been sacked as a 'doorman' at the Rehearsal Club and also had connections to the 'Billiard Hall' in Great Windmill Street doing 'marking ' there is significant[also Page 146 of Foot] .
    Great Windmill Street Billiard Hall was quite notorious for attracting big shot gangsters .It was run by Jack Solomon the boxing promoter who 'marked Bob Monkhouse's card ' [see page 179 Chapter 14 "Those were the Krays" in James Morton's book , "Gangland Soho'.See also "Crying with Laughter" by Bob Monkhouse page 133.
    Gangland Soho in particular gives some background to Solomon's Gym with its Billiard Hall in Great Windmill Street and the characters who frequented in in the late 1950's and early 1960's and by default who France was 'mingling' with when 'marking' there in 1961.The Rehearsal Club itself is across the street-not even 2 minutes away.
    Image below is from page 146 of Foot's book on the A6
    Attached Files
    Last edited by Natalie Severn; 06-20-2014, 03:12 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Natalie Severn
    replied
    Originally posted by Graham View Post
    Hi Nats,



    In fact Dixie France was "manager" of The Harmony Cafe in Archer Street, a real dive which attracted various low life and was also well-known as a place where modern-jazz musicians met. Dixie was well-known for keeping a selection of weapons under the counter in case of trouble, but I'm not sure if this selection included a gun. I don't think he was employed by The Rehearsal Club, but was definitely something of a regular there. One of Dixie's previous convictions is listed as "unlawful possession of an overcoat", which for some reason I find funny!

    Graham
    Thanks Graham,
    As you see Paul Foot has him having lost his job as a 'Doorman" at the Rehearsal Club on Page 146 of his book ,"Who Killed Hanratty?"
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • NickB
    replied
    Defence investigators went to Rhyl after his photo taken on the 5th.

    Leave a comment:


  • Natalie Severn
    replied
    Spitfire -I need a bit more information.Yes, as you say ,both defence and prosecution were presumably seeking out witnesses in Rhyl after 29th January .Cheers N
    Last edited by Natalie Severn; 06-19-2014, 03:18 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Natalie Severn
    replied
    Grateful for the link to that article Nick but I think the bit about Hanratty describing Dutton must be incorrect . However tomorrow I will try to find Sherrard's statement in which he says something along the lines of being as certain as he could be that he had not ever been shown Mr Dutton's statement.
    [Sorry but I have had severe hay fever today and the antihistamines I take for it are not helping my concentration- need to get some sleep actually].
    Best Norma

    Leave a comment:


  • Spitfire
    replied
    I don't think that there was anything sinister in the delay in announcing what James Hanratty's true alibi was.

    It is true that the defence only found out that Hanratty had changed his alibi on the 29 January, but that fact was only announced when Michael Sherrard began his opening speech for the defence on 6 February, 8 days later. At that time there was no obligation on a defendant to give particulars of his alibi. Obviously evidence given in the witness box which was inconsistent with previous statements given to the police would tell against the defendant. But the police would not have been in a position to interview James Hanratty had they been given advance notice as to the exact particulars of the alibi.

    It seems that it was only on 6 February that Mrs Grace Jones had been located by the Hanratty's investigators. It would be interesting to know if Mr Sherrard had notice that Mrs Jones had been located when he began his speech for the defence.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X