Nick, a point of information: voice identification is even more unreliable than visual identification.
Hi All,
I have said before, Valerie acted in good faith, ofcourse she did .She believed Hanratty was her attacker.I fully accept that.But sadly her conviction doesn"t make her right.
If I believed Hanratty actually was Valerie"s attacker and was the man who brought such suffering on her and the Gregsten family, then,although I am personally opposed to the death penalty,it would make me indifferent about what had happened to Hanratty.To be perfectly honest I would think he had fully deserved it.
BUT,as I have argued and given reasons for , I dont believe Hanratty had anything whatsoever to do with it .I believe the case against him was built on errors of judgment, lies and deception.So to me Hanratty has been murdered by the state, for a crime he didnt commit .
Hi All,
I have said before, Valerie acted in good faith, ofcourse she did .She believed Hanratty was her attacker.I fully accept that.But sadly her conviction doesn"t make her right.
If I believed Hanratty actually was Valerie"s attacker and was the man who brought such suffering on her and the Gregsten family, then,although I am personally opposed to the death penalty,it would make me indifferent about what had happened to Hanratty.To be perfectly honest I would think he had fully deserved it.
BUT,as I have argued and given reasons for , I dont believe Hanratty had anything whatsoever to do with it .I believe the case against him was built on errors of judgment, lies and deception.So to me Hanratty has been murdered by the state, for a crime he didnt commit .
Comment