Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Zodiac Candidate

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    I would call the Zodiac a terrorist, as opposed to a sexual serial killer. I think most serial killers are motivated either by power over a single victim, or power over society, and the ones who are motivated by power over a single person usually get off on it, and have a lot in common with rapists, whether the killer actually rapes the victim or not. The ones who want power over society have a lot in common with political assassins, they just haven't attached themselves to a cause-- or they've made their own aggrandizement the cause. I want to say that Lee Harvey Oswald has a lot in common with the Zodiac, but I don't want derail this thread into a debate about the Kennedy assassination, so let's just say that the theoretical Oswald presented by people like Gerald Posner has the same psychology as a serial killer like the Zodiac.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by RivkahChaya View Post
      I would call the Zodiac a terrorist, as opposed to a sexual serial killer. I think most serial killers are motivated either by power over a single victim, or power over society, and the ones who are motivated by power over a single person usually get off on it, and have a lot in common with rapists, whether the killer actually rapes the victim or not. The ones who want power over society have a lot in common with political assassins, they just haven't attached themselves to a cause-- or they've made their own aggrandizement the cause. I want to say that Lee Harvey Oswald has a lot in common with the Zodiac, but I don't want derail this thread into a debate about the Kennedy assassination, so let's just say that the theoretical Oswald presented by people like Gerald Posner has the same psychology as a serial killer like the Zodiac.
      Hi RC
      I would disagree with that label. Terrorists have a political and/or religious motive for their actions and belong to groups.

      Zodiac was a thrill kill serial killer. Vey similar to Son of Sam.
      And while I agree that there was little to no sexual aspect to there killings there could be a peripheral sexish (for lack of better word)aspect in that they targeted couples and may have possibly got some kind of arousal or satisfaction from killing people who seemed to have normal sexual relationships. Mad at the world so to speak and/or jealous of people who weren't losers like themselves.
      "Is all that we see or seem
      but a dream within a dream?"

      -Edgar Allan Poe


      "...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
      quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

      -Frederick G. Abberline

      Comment


      • #33
        Son of Sam was nuts, though, and taking orders from the neighbors dog. Zodiac took real pleasure in being the Zodiac. He seemed to waffle between wanting credit for what he'd done, and knowing that taking full credit would put an end to his reign of terror. He wrapped himself up as completely in the Zodiac identity as he could, so that he could know that any time someone expressed fear, that was his doing. He wanted the Zodiac to go down in history, like Jack the Ripper, or the New Orleans Axeman. I don't think Son of Sam saw himself as a force in history-- albeit, I think some people could be both terrorists and sexual sadists: BTK, for example.

        I think for Zodiac there was a lot of pleasure in writing those ciphers and anticipating the fear the whole city would be gripped in when they were published. He never shot up a school bus, but the threat was more fearsome than the aftermath of any one of his actual crimes against adults.

        But, unless he's caught, we'll never know for sure.

        Comment


        • #34
          That's if there was a 'Zodiac'. I've my doubts that Paul Stine was murdered by the same man who was killing kids in lovers lanes. And if the Zodiac didn't kill Stine, then he didn't send the bloodied shirt and the letters.

          Comment


          • #35
            I think there was a Zodiac. But I do think he exaggerated his kill-rate, and took credit for some things he didn't do.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Harry D View Post
              Then we have the variation in murder weapons:

              Lake Herman - .22 semi-auto pistol

              Blue Rock Springs Park - 9mm semi-auto pistol

              Lake Berryessa - knife

              Presidio Heights - 9mm semi-auto pistol
              Regarding Lake Berryessa, Hartnell said he thought the gun was a .45 but I'm not sure how familiar he was with firearms. And even if he was a firearms expert, a 9 mm might look like a .45 to you when you are staring down the barrel.
              This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

              Stan Reid

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by sdreid View Post
                Regarding Lake Berryessa, Hartnell said he thought the gun was a .45 but I'm not sure how familiar he was with firearms. And even if he was a firearms expert, a 9 mm might look like a .45 to you when you are staring down the barrel.
                The murder weapon in the Lake Berryessa attacks was a knife, not a gun.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Harry D View Post
                  The murder weapon in the Lake Berryessa attacks was a knife, not a gun.
                  IIRC, the cause of the death, and near-death was a knife, but the killer had a gun, and the was what he used to threaten the victims when he forced one to tie up the other. I didn't look this up, just now, but if memory serves, the Lake Berryessa attack was the one where he wore the hood, and in the famous witness description-based drawing, where he is wearing the hood, he's holding a gun. Again, IIRC, another time when he used a gun he was also carrying a knife. For all I know, he also carried a lead pipe, and a candlestick. No, seriously, I wouldn't be surprised if he carried multiple weapons on himself each time he attacked. If any killer ever had multiple guns and made a point of using more than one just for the hell of it-- you know, more guns = more badass-- it would be Zodiac.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    If I was going to choose a Zodiac victim who I don't think really was a Zodiac victim, it would be Kathleen Johns.
                    This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

                    Stan Reid

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X