Originally posted by Abby Normal
View Post
Professor Webster’s descriptor of Bella was - age 25-40 probably nearer 35. Around 5 feet tall. Irregular lower teeth. Her clothes appear to have been not very high quality. Mousy hair ( though on a tv programme years later he said ‘ginger’ which no one seems able to explain except in that apparently hair can go that colour after death.)
He felt that she was placed there before rigor set in or after it had gone due to the tight space in the tree. Although if it was after rigor putrefaction would have begun. She also had a tooth missing which had come out post mortem. It wasn’t found in or around the tree so she could have been killed elsewhere.
It seems that the witchcraft theory at least partially came from the belief that one of her hands was found a certain exact distance away (something connected to witchcraft) This doesn’t appear to have been the case as there’s no mention of this in any records so it sounds like a legend. Plus Donald McCormick wrote a book on the witchcraft angle so the hugest pinch of salt might be required
Ive just noticed something that must be an error. Webster mentions an irregularity in her teeth on the lower jaw but when you see the skull photos (confirmed by the facial reconstruction) the irregularities were in the teeth of the upper jaw? Don’t understand how he could have gotten that wrong and no one picked up on it. I think I’ll give the book a re-read tomorrow.
Leave a comment: