Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

kennedy assassination

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Stephen Thomas
    replied
    Originally posted by cappuccina View Post
    ...I've been up in the Textbook Depository, and yes, a trained marksman could have hit a target in a very slow moving motorcade car...

    In addition, I know someone who was a supporting ballistics expert on the Warren Commission, and scientifically, Oswald was the lone gunman...

    Now, whether he was acting entirely alone is a different matter; you must distinguish between the two...
    Hi Cappucina

    Oh well, I'm sure you know best, being an American and all that.

    Sorry I spoke.

    What does your 'ballistics' pal have to say about the so-called Magic Bullet?

    What is in the quote box above is illogical (by the way)

    Leave a comment:


  • cappuccina
    replied
    Stephen, there is no need to be rude, just present...

    ...your case...

    I have been to Dealey Plaza...it is smaller and "closer" to the Schoolbook Depository building than it looks on film or in still pictures. I don't think that it is out of the question for a trained marksman to have hit people in a slow moving motorcade coming right past (below) where the gunman was perched. What do you see as impossible about this?

    Leave a comment:


  • dougie
    replied
    stephen,

    sorry for gordon brown but it seems if you want a job done properly....you gotta have a scotsman do it......and no need to apologise for culloden or glencoe for that matter.....we let the bloody sassenachs win
    rank is but the guinea stamp,
    a mans a man for a that
    guess somebody will say i misquoted burns masterpiece...but i didnt..i merely updated it.
    anybody know wat the england-scotland rugby result was?
    regards

    Leave a comment:


  • Stephen Thomas
    replied
    Oops

    Sorry dougie

    That should have said 'Culloden'.

    Bannockburn was when those wonderful Scottish heroes mashed up those Anglo Saxon villiains how many hundred years ago?

    Leave a comment:


  • Stephen Thomas
    replied
    Originally posted by cappuccina View Post
    ...I've been up in the Textbook Depository, and yes, a trained marksman could have hit a target in a very slow moving motorcade car...

    In addition, I know someone who was a supporting ballistics expert on the Warren Commission, and scientifically, Oswald was the lone gunman...

    ...
    Hi Cappucina,

    Yeah, sure and I'm Johnny Depp. Or a banana.

    Hey 'dougie'

    Apologies for Bannockburn .

    Leave a comment:


  • dougie
    replied
    true what you said stan...but i guess it also doubles your chance of getting the job done too but saying that i doubt whether anyone could have "worked" with oswald in that way..everything seems to suggest he was a classic"loner".......one thing though,above all others puzzles me, no record seems to exist of oswalds interrogation by the police after his arrest....police apparently didnt have a tape recorder on hand,and nobody took notes so im led to understand...exceedingly odd to put it mildly.
    regards

    Leave a comment:


  • sdreid
    replied
    It only takes one gunman to kill a person. If you have more than that, you're stupid. All it does is double your chances of being caught.

    Leave a comment:


  • cappuccina
    replied
    Hi Stephen, with all due respect...

    ...I've been up in the Textbook Depository, and yes, a trained marksman could have hit a target in a very slow moving motorcade car...

    In addition, I know someone who was a supporting ballistics expert on the Warren Commission, and scientifically, Oswald was the lone gunman...

    Now, whether he was acting entirely alone is a different matter; you must distinguish between the two...

    Leave a comment:


  • dougie
    replied
    Originally posted by Stephen Thomas View Post
    What bollocks



    And the US Government cut out the frames of this amateur movie footage that clearly show the shot coming from the front.

    Now why would they want to do that?
    twas an accident in the f.b.1. film processing dept ....cough

    Leave a comment:


  • Stephen Thomas
    replied
    What bollocks

    From where he was, Oswald couldn't have hit an elephant's backside with the gun he had.

    The Zapruder film shows quite clearly that Kennedy was hit from the front most likely from the 'grassy knoll'

    How quaint. Were there pixies there?

    And the US Government cut out the frames of this amateur movie footage that clearly show the shot coming from the front.

    Now why would they want to do that?

    Leave a comment:


  • Graham
    replied
    JFK will be argued about until the end of time, but speaking personally I find it just about impossible to believe that Oswald acted completely alone. Perhaps not a full-blown conspiracy involving dozens or even hundreds of faceless characters. It's always in any government's interests to play down anything that smacks of 'conspiracy' - even when the Gunpowder Plot was uncovered efforts were made to pin the plot on a very few men, when in fact considerably more than a 'very few' were actually involved.

    For me, the presence of Ruby in the basement all but proves that he, Ruby, was tipped off and that Oswald was killed before he could talk and implicate others. Far too much of a coincidence.

    Cheers,

    Graham

    Leave a comment:


  • dougie
    replied
    After reading mailers book "oswald" a few years ago,i came to the conclusion if oswald did it ,it was probabley on his own,such a complex guy i doubt if he could have acted in unison with anyone......but then of course theres the question did ruby kill oswald on his own? or rather on his own impulse,or was he part of the same,or a wider conspiracy ? there has never been,in my opinion a convincing answer to that.
    regards

    Leave a comment:


  • steje73
    replied
    I never thought of that. Maybe I was going too much by my own ability at aiming at things!

    Leave a comment:


  • richardnunweek
    replied
    Hi,
    Refering to the last post.
    I feel the gunman [ oswald] although could have had a better target as the motorcade came towards him, would have decided a better option to escape detection was to shoot from the rear when all eyes would have been away from the building where the gunman was.
    The kennedy assasination holds as many intriques as our JTR, complete with the 'Magic Bullet' theory, and the Mob, and the Cuba connection.
    The shooting of Kennedy showing the head shot , is very disturbing. and a tragic event in history.
    Regards Richard.

    Leave a comment:


  • jason_c
    replied
    Originally posted by steje73 View Post
    One thing I don't get is why, if Oswald did it from the window, he didn't shoot Kennedy sooner. People have been reported as seeing someone there up to 15 minutes beforehand, so he could have had a crack at him as he was driving along the street towards the building and was completely open, instead of waiting until the motorcade had passed and he had a much more difficult target to aim at.
    He must have been confident that he could do it like that.
    One explanation is that Oswald wasnt sure which car the President was in. There were a number of cars in the motorcade. As the motorcade turns Oswald gets his closest view of the President's car.

    I also believe Oswald killed Kennedy. If a 3rd rate burglary such as Watergate cannot be hushed up, theres little chance of a Presidential assasination being kept quiet.

    The Bugliosi book sounds interesting. Ive read his account of the Manson murders.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X