Mr. Lord's Letter
Hi Celesta,
Now it gets on.
In October 1986 I wrote to Mr. Lord about the theory that Captain Stanley Lord of the Californian was unfairly stigmatized by the Attorney General of England (Sit Rufus Isaacs) who was currently involved in a scandal dealing with England's Marconi Wireless Company. I also discussed (negatively) a legend about a crewman who was supposed to have survived the Titanic, the Empress of Ireland, and the Lusitania.
"November 19, 1986
Dear Mr. Bloomfield:
Belated thanks for your letter of October 3. I am just not set up for the volumes of mail coming in.
As for Peter Padfield's theory that Sir Rufus Isaacs was simply trying to improve his image in the wake of the Marconi scandal, you've already gone to the heart of the matter. The case against the CALIFORNIAN is not based on anything that happened in London; it is based on what happened on the North Atlantic that night. The man on the Californian's bridge saw the rockets, knew they resembled distress signals and suspected that the ship firing them was in trouble, yet the Californian did nothing.
Yes, I knowall about "Lucky" Tower and am highly suspicious of the story. He is not included on any list of the Titanic's crew. Including what is called the "payoff list", which the surviving crewmen had to sign to get their
pay. If he existed at all I think he would have at least signed that!
Thanks again for a fine letter.
Sincerely
Walter Lord
P.S. Excuse the reverse of this sheet;
the carbon paper somehow got into the
typewriter backwards.
W.L."
The letter's back is darker over the letters as a result.
I think this letter will be valuable. I also have letters from George MacDonald Fraser (the Flashman novels) and Jack Finney (TIME AND AGAIN)
Best wishes,
Jeff
Hi Celesta,
Now it gets on.
In October 1986 I wrote to Mr. Lord about the theory that Captain Stanley Lord of the Californian was unfairly stigmatized by the Attorney General of England (Sit Rufus Isaacs) who was currently involved in a scandal dealing with England's Marconi Wireless Company. I also discussed (negatively) a legend about a crewman who was supposed to have survived the Titanic, the Empress of Ireland, and the Lusitania.
"November 19, 1986
Dear Mr. Bloomfield:
Belated thanks for your letter of October 3. I am just not set up for the volumes of mail coming in.
As for Peter Padfield's theory that Sir Rufus Isaacs was simply trying to improve his image in the wake of the Marconi scandal, you've already gone to the heart of the matter. The case against the CALIFORNIAN is not based on anything that happened in London; it is based on what happened on the North Atlantic that night. The man on the Californian's bridge saw the rockets, knew they resembled distress signals and suspected that the ship firing them was in trouble, yet the Californian did nothing.
Yes, I knowall about "Lucky" Tower and am highly suspicious of the story. He is not included on any list of the Titanic's crew. Including what is called the "payoff list", which the surviving crewmen had to sign to get their
pay. If he existed at all I think he would have at least signed that!
Thanks again for a fine letter.
Sincerely
Walter Lord
P.S. Excuse the reverse of this sheet;
the carbon paper somehow got into the
typewriter backwards.
W.L."
The letter's back is darker over the letters as a result.
I think this letter will be valuable. I also have letters from George MacDonald Fraser (the Flashman novels) and Jack Finney (TIME AND AGAIN)
Best wishes,
Jeff
Comment