If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I still adore you from the tip of your shiny pate to the ends of your gnarly toes. And I know full well it was that dastardly bastard Neil and not you.
Ally,
Who you kidding? I know you want me....its like kicking the boy you fancy in the school playground.
I still adore you from the tip of your shiny pate to the ends of your gnarly toes. And I know full well it was that dastardly bastard Neil and not you.
Well, I normally blame him for everything else sweety
For anyone who doesn't know what Neil is on about, P.C Holland's first name has never (as far as I am aware) been published anywhere. In all the books you see it's just P.C Holland 814.
I'm glad to see an article with a re-newed look at at Leather Apron. Most writers have assumed that this character could only refer to Pizer because of Sgt. Thick's declaration that he and LA were one and the same. I believe Martin Fido was the first to cast doubts that Pizer was LA in The Crimes, Detection & Death of JTR ,p. 210-214. Pizer, as far as is known, was never asked if knew Mickeldy Joe, the reported companion of Mr. Apron. Thick's testimony is suspect enough to cast doubts as to whether Leather Apron was really ever caught. If Pizer was queried about Mickeldy Joe, it would have been reported if he said he knew him. The fact that it wasn't suggests that either Pizer didn't know him, or he was never asked if he knew him. Thus there are lingering doubts about the "real" Leather Apron. Was he Jack the Ripper, as street prostitutes who were interviewed by the press, avowed?
I'm glad to see an article with a re-newed look at at Leather Apron. Most writers have assumed that this character could only refer to Pizer because of Sgt. Thick's declaration that he and LA were one and the same. I believe Martin Fido was the first to cast doubts that Pizer was LA in The Crimes, Detection & Death of JTR ,p. 210-214. Pizer, as far as is known, was never asked if knew Mickeldy Joe, the reported companion of Mr. Apron. Thick's testimony is suspect enough to cast doubts as to whether Leather Apron was really ever caught. If Pizer was queried about Mickeldy Joe, it would have been reported if he said he knew him. The fact that it wasn't suggests that either Pizer didn't know him, or he was never asked if he knew him. Thus there are lingering doubts about the "real" Leather Apron. Was he Jack the Ripper, as street prostitutes who were interviewed by the press, avowed?
Actually it has to be doubted if there ever was a "Leather Apron" who terrorized prostitutes, or whether it was a story souped up by Harry Dam or some other reporter. The fact that the name did not surface in the case until after Polly Nichols' murder is highly suspicious.
Chris
Christopher T. George
Organizer, RipperCon #JacktheRipper-#True Crime Conference
just held in Baltimore, April 7-8, 2018.
For information about RipperCon, go to http://rippercon.com/ RipperCon 2018 talks can now be heard at http://www.casebook.org/podcast/
Where's Ripperologist 110? I needs me some Hainsworth. No doubt Scott Nelson does as well. The free Christmas 'stocking stuffer' was very cool. Those illustrations were fantastic.
Comment