Where's Ripperologist 110? I needs me some Hainsworth. No doubt Scott Nelson does as well. The free Christmas 'stocking stuffer' was very cool. Those illustrations were fantastic.
Yours truly,
Tom Wescott
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ripperologist 109
Collapse
X
-
Actually it has to be doubted if there ever was a "Leather Apron" who terrorized prostitutes, or whether it was a story souped up by Harry Dam or some other reporter. The fact that the name did not surface in the case until after Polly Nichols' murder is highly suspicious.Originally posted by Scott Nelson View PostI'm glad to see an article with a re-newed look at at Leather Apron. Most writers have assumed that this character could only refer to Pizer because of Sgt. Thick's declaration that he and LA were one and the same. I believe Martin Fido was the first to cast doubts that Pizer was LA in The Crimes, Detection & Death of JTR ,p. 210-214. Pizer, as far as is known, was never asked if knew Mickeldy Joe, the reported companion of Mr. Apron. Thick's testimony is suspect enough to cast doubts as to whether Leather Apron was really ever caught. If Pizer was queried about Mickeldy Joe, it would have been reported if he said he knew him. The fact that it wasn't suggests that either Pizer didn't know him, or he was never asked if he knew him. Thus there are lingering doubts about the "real" Leather Apron. Was he Jack the Ripper, as street prostitutes who were interviewed by the press, avowed?
Chris
Leave a comment:
-
I'm glad to see an article with a re-newed look at at Leather Apron. Most writers have assumed that this character could only refer to Pizer because of Sgt. Thick's declaration that he and LA were one and the same. I believe Martin Fido was the first to cast doubts that Pizer was LA in The Crimes, Detection & Death of JTR ,p. 210-214. Pizer, as far as is known, was never asked if knew Mickeldy Joe, the reported companion of Mr. Apron. Thick's testimony is suspect enough to cast doubts as to whether Leather Apron was really ever caught. If Pizer was queried about Mickeldy Joe, it would have been reported if he said he knew him. The fact that it wasn't suggests that either Pizer didn't know him, or he was never asked if he knew him. Thus there are lingering doubts about the "real" Leather Apron. Was he Jack the Ripper, as street prostitutes who were interviewed by the press, avowed?
Leave a comment:
-
What? their heads?They're sooooooo shiny.
Yes, Hollands first name was Fred. And he lived near Swallow Gardens in 1891....could he be the mysterious City PC?*
Monty

* That'll draw em in Rob.
Leave a comment:
-
I'm fine with thatOriginally posted by Monty View PostRob,
She only wants you for your award, ask Stephen.
Monty


For anyone who doesn't know what Neil is on about, P.C Holland's first name has never (as far as I am aware) been published anywhere. In all the books you see it's just P.C Holland 814.
Rob
Leave a comment:
-
Ally,
Any real sudent of the case would have noted it immediately.
I rued already, very rued.
Rob,
She only wants you for your award, ask Stephen.
Monty
Leave a comment:
-
One day when I am all grown up and a supermodel you will rue the day you didn't want me. RUE!Originally posted by Monty View PostAlly,
Who you kidding? I know you want me....its like kicking the boy you fancy in the school playground.
Dammit. Subtlety and dilaudid do not mix.PS Frederick
Leave a comment:
-
Ally,Originally posted by Ally View PostI still adore you from the tip of your shiny pate to the ends of your gnarly toes. And I know full well it was that dastardly bastard Neil and not you.
Who you kidding? I know you want me....its like kicking the boy you fancy in the school playground.
Monty

PS Frederick
Leave a comment:
-
Damn, that error is down to me and Neil. Holland's pay was raised to 34 shillings.Originally posted by Ally View Postp. 60. typo: raised to 3rd pay rate of 32 shillings, then raised to second pay grade of....32 shillings. Hardly a raise, eh?
And I don't know who's mistake this was (it wasn't mine) the photo on page 57 should read just 'Aldgate - 1883' and not 'Aldgate High Street - 1883'.
Rob
Leave a comment:
-
Just to set the record straight (again) about Aaron Kozminski's family - he did not have "sisters Betsy and Matilda, [a] brother Woolf [and] brothers-in-law Woolfe Abrahams and Morris Lubnowski", as stated in Simon Wood's article (p. 8).
Woolf Abrahams was Aaron's brother, not his brother-in-law, and Betsy was not Aaron's sister.
In the past, Woolf had been assumed to be Aaron's brother-in-law because the maiden name of Woolf's wife Betsy was Kozminski. But we now know that Betsy (originally Brucha) was the daughter of one Szlama Kozminski, and was married to Woolf (Wolek) Kozminski at Kolo in 1881, immediately before the couple came to England. In England, like the rest of Aaron's family, Woolf and Betsy were known by the surname Abrahams.
Leave a comment:

Leave a comment: