Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Casebook Examiner No. 2 (June 2010)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • investigative agency

    Hello Caz. Your post is succinct and well reasoned. It brings up the inevitable question, Did Le Grand EVER work a legitimate case? or, what is nearly the same, Did he ever work as a serious (or quasi-serious) investigator?

    I saw a snippet in Lloyd's Weekly from April 1888, where a private investigative firm was advertising as being the only such firm in London. So, did Le Grand have ambitions of giving competition to the other firm, or was his agency merely a front?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Comment


    • Caz wrote:
      Hi Maria,
      Well yes, and I wondered why people had been carefully avoiding the subject. I thought old man Packer was taken initially to see Kate, to test his willingness to 'recognise' any old recently murdered female, with the result that he confidently stated he had never seen her before. Had she been Liz, it would have been over for him at that point. Even sooner, had he said of Kate: "Yes, that's the woman I saw".

      Hi, Caz. VERY interesting point. I can imagine that Le Grand would have “coached“ Packer on what to say, were the story of his manipulations true. I still need to read up about Packer and Le Grand (starting with Examiner 2), since I'm everything but informed about all this.

      To Tom Wescott:
      I know the show like my inside pocket, and I own every single episode, unfortunately minus the unaired pilot with another actress than Alyson Hannigan for Willow, which is not in the European version of season 1 on DVD. I haven't read the season 8 comic book, but from what I've heard it caters more to comic book fans (and Josh Whedon is such a one). The part about Dawn having swollen up to gigantic proportions after having been acquainted with I-don't-know-what-you'd-call-it I still haven't been able to figure out.
      Tom Wescott wrote:
      Thank you for the gracious compliment about my instincts.

      I don't remember having issued anything like that? Possibly I was just referring to Spike. (And by the way, are we sure to still be on a casebook thread here?! )
      As for South Africa, it's minorly related to the JTR case. Not just due to numerous fake Ripper letters having originated from ZA, but wasn't one of the police officials involved with the JTR case also active in South Africa or something? I apologize most profoundly for not having researched this, but I'm so woozy after 4 hours of dancing non stop, followed by another couple hours of girly chatting at my place. And by the way: Not only are Stellenbosch and its campus quite the party town, but my new South African friend (whom 3 days ago I didn't know from Adam's cat) and I totally put the town on fire until a little while ago. It was just like in the episode Bad girls. (She was B, I was Faith...)
      Best regards,
      Maria

      Comment


      • Hi Lynn,

        Here's a private detective who had a walk-on role in the WM.

        [London] Evening News, 29th October 1888–

        THE EAST END MURDERS. EXPECTED IMPORTANT ARREST.

        "The Central News learns that Private-detective Slater, of Basinghall-street, has submitted to the Scotland-yard authorities information of a most valuable character in connection with the personality of the Whitechapel murderer. It is believed that a most important arrest will shortly be made."

        Slater's advertisement ran throughout the LVP–

        Click image for larger version

Name:	1890 SLATER DETECTIVES AD (2).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	58.3 KB
ID:	659844

        In 1904 Henry Slater [aka Henry Seymour, Captain Scott and Captain Brown], his lawyer and two detectives were arrested on charges of conspiracy involving the fabrication of evidence in a divorce case.

        Regards,

        Simon
        Never believe anything until it has been officially denied.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
          Hello Caz. Your post is succinct and well reasoned. It brings up the inevitable question, Did Le Grand EVER work a legitimate case? or, what is nearly the same, Did he ever work as a serious (or quasi-serious) investigator?

          I saw a snippet in Lloyd's Weekly from April 1888, where a private investigative firm was advertising as being the only such firm in London. So, did Le Grand have ambitions of giving competition to the other firm, or was his agency merely a front?

          Cheers.
          LC
          Hi Lynn,
          I have been researching Le Grand for a long time and never yet found a mention of him working a legitimate case as a private detective, although that doesn't mean he never did, I know. He claimed to have been working as a detective on the Parnell Inquiry, which solicitor George Henry Lewis denied. Every other mention of private inquiry work talked about in his trials etc. seems to have been a front connected to blackmail in some way.

          As an add on to what Simon has just posted, it appears that there were many private detective's in London, not all working for agencies however.
          Meicklejohn, the disgraced Scotland yard detective was advertising as a private inquiry man in 1888, and placed an advert looking for information on the latest 'Whitechapel Mystery' a couple of days after the Kelly murder.

          Comment


          • Hi Debra,

            Yep, me too. Not a sniff of Le Grand other than his less savoury pursuits. No sniff of him either in or around the Special Commission inquiry in which The Times employed as many low-life PIs as it could lay its hands on. This is how I found Mieklejohn, hard at work in Dublin.

            Nice find, by the way, of his ad in the press. Who's to say the events of late 1888/early 1889 weren't interconnected?

            I found an interesting 1891 interview with a lady detective–

            "I entered [the profession] at a peculiarly lucky time. There were few lady detectives then, and there are few now. It is quite a mistake to suppose that there are lady detectives at Scotland Yard. There are none. It is true that some female police are in the pay of the Home Office, but that is quite a different thing.

            "These were introduced on this wise. Some years ago it used to be customary for ticket-of-leave women to report themselves once a month at the police station of their respective districts. This was a great injustice to these women. The stain of crime was thus ever upon them, and this soon got noised abroad, and prevented them from gaining their living in an honest, respectable fashion.

            "The Home Office saw this, and so several female police were appointed to keep an eye on these women, thus saving them from the disgrace of making periodical visits to the district police station.

            "You must not suppose that lady detectives are the rough, tawdry set of women you might be inclined to think. Some of them I could name are most highly educated ladies, and one is a lady of Newnham College, Cambridge, where she studied with high distinction."

            Food for thought.

            Regards,

            Simon
            Never believe anything until it has been officially denied.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
              Hi Debra,

              Yep, me too. Not a sniff of Le Grand other than his less savoury pursuits. No sniff of him either in or around the Special Commission inquiry in which The Times employed as many low-life PIs as it could lay its hands on. This is how I found Mieklejohn, hard at work in Dublin.

              Nice find, by the way, of his ad in the press. Who's to say the events of late 1888/early 1889 weren't interconnected?
              Hi Simon,
              (Aplogies everyone else , this is off topic, but it's short)
              Here's the ad from 17th November 1888, it appeared in the Standard on the 17th, Lloyd's and Reynold's on the 18th. Note the phrase' being instructed in the matter of the Whitechapel Mystery' sounds like he was working for someone on this?

              Click image for larger version

Name:	The Standard (London, England), Saturday, November 17, 1888 meiklejohn PI.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	16.1 KB
ID:	659845

              Interesting about the female PI's. I've only ever come across them mentioned as employed in a similar manner to a modern day 'store detective.'

              Comment


              • Jane Coram:

                "Actually, I'm rather partial to a man in waders!"

                There you go, Jane - and I´ve got two pairs of them...!

                The best,
                Fisherman

                Comment


                • Slater

                  Hello Simon. Indeed, Slater is the chap to whom I was referring.

                  Turns out an unsavoury character? Pity.

                  Thanks for this!

                  Cheers.
                  LC

                  Comment


                  • characters

                    Hello Debra. And thank you for this as well.

                    What? Another unsavoury character/s? I suppose the question now becomes, Were any of the London LVP private investigators upstanding moral examples? (heh-heh)

                    Cheers.
                    LC

                    Comment


                    • Hi Lynn,

                      After the Ripper murders, Abberline, Littlechild and Shore became London representatives of the Pinkerton Detective Agency.

                      Then in 1908 there was this ex-cop . . .

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	WHITAKER'S ALMANACK 1908 SWEENEY PRIVATE DETECTIVE (2).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	51.6 KB
ID:	659846

                      . . . and also this lady–

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	WHITAKER'S ALMANACK 1908 KATE EASTON LADY DETECTIVES (2).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	59.9 KB
ID:	659847

                      Regards,

                      Simon
                      Never believe anything until it has been officially denied.

                      Comment


                      • bastions

                        Hello Simon. Thanks for this.

                        And please tell me that they WERE NOT later arrested, but were, instead, bastions of moral character.

                        The best.
                        LC

                        Comment


                        • You can't teach an old dog new tricks

                          Hi All,

                          The more I think about it, the more Packer seems to have been a perfect tool - er, in the sense of allowing a dodgy, self-styled PI a bit of self-LeGrandizement at the expense of his eternal enemy, the boys in blue, one of whom - White to be exact - had just come away without a sausage from our fanciful old fruiterer.

                          What an opportunity, and what a simple job it was, for Le Grand and his unconfirmed Batchelor to pull off the small coup of making the force look clueless in the eyes of the press and public, while making themselves look like Holmes and Watson by comparison.

                          If only the old man had stuck with one very simple account of selling some fruit to a man with a woman who turned out to be Liz, then seeing no more, the fun might have lasted a bit longer. Instead, Packer took to the craic with such relish that he told a bunch of grape stories, each more implausible than the one before, with the result that any loss of face suffered by the police was only temporary, and there were no medals for the meddlesome detective duo.

                          There is really nothing left to explain concerning Le Grand's behaviour, and no cause to see him as the murderer on a cunning mission to cover his arse. Packer would have been entirely the wrong man to help him do it. Yes, he was probably a safe enough bet, given that the killer would have needed a pawn who hadn't seen him hanging around before or after the murder. It would be no good if Packer had recognised the private dick now squeezing him for juicy gossip: "Wait a minute, I know you, Tall Boy. You passed by my place that night smoking a pipe, just like the one you are puffing away on now".

                          But how could Le Grand be expecting the cops to go off on a wild goose chase on Packer's say-so - a man who initially denied seeing anyone acting suspiciously?

                          This just doesn't work as a neck-saving exercise. It's all a bit too much.

                          Or should I say, all a bit too Hutch.

                          And that one has been done to death.

                          Love,

                          Caz
                          X
                          "Comedy is simply a funny way of being serious." Peter Ustinov


                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by caz
                            What an opportunity, and what a simple job it was, for Le Grand and his unconfirmed Batchelor to pull off the small coup of making the force look clueless in the eyes of the press and public, while making themselves look like Holmes and Watson by comparison.
                            Except that wasn't what they were after. We have all of TWO newspaper articles which even mention their names, one of which is small and so obscure it was just discovered in recent months. In spite of their position with the WVC and Le Grand's connections, he did not make any attempt to capitalize, and seems in fact to have avoided publicity at all cost.

                            Originally posted by caz
                            There is really nothing left to explain concerning Le Grand's behaviour, and no cause to see him as the murderer on a cunning mission to cover his arse.
                            I don't know how you figure that. Subsequent to the Packer episode, Le Grand falls under suspicion for the Ripper murders and remains under suspicion into the 20th century. This can be said only about a handful of men. Among those men, only one can be shown to be inserting himself into the investigation, and in a manner that can only be described as desperate. The end result of that subterfuge is Grape Man and the Batty Street Lodger, two characters who have figured very large in Ripper writings from 1888 all the way up to the present day.

                            Yours truly,

                            Tom Wescott

                            Comment


                            • Maria,

                              Joss Whedon refuses to officially release the Buffy pilot, cuz he hates it. I got it bootleg. You can google around and find sites on the net where you can watch it. The principal is different too, otherwise it's a pretty straight-forward 30 minute version of the aired pilot.

                              Yours truly,

                              Tom Wescott

                              Comment


                              • Tom,
                                (are we on the right thread here, or on another kind of forum ?)
                                So it's a bootleg. OK. Thank you so much for the info. By the way, I've even watched the non canonical movie a few months ago, when it played on German TV in February.)
                                Gotta go now, trying to get out a 1 inch long urchin needle from my foot with a needle and some massage oil (don't ask).
                                Best regards,
                                Maria

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X