Originally posted by Scott Nelson
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Casebook Examiner No. 2 (June 2010)
Collapse
X
-
This thread is so much FUN! I only hope that Tom Wescott will reply to my questions at some point (perhaps tomorrow). I'll probably go back to Examiner 2 (which is fascinating) after finishing another project. It's raining cats and dogs, but tropical-like in Berlin. It feels like in Brazil or something.Best regards,
Maria
Comment
-
Hello Maria,
Trevor Marriot is the man you mean I think. From the little I understand, It is a time-consuming process, which has all sorts of obstacles and procedures.
The link is here.. http://forum.casebook.org/showthread...506#post137506
best wishes
PhilLast edited by Phil Carter; 08-03-2010, 03:31 AM.Chelsea FC. TRUE BLUE. 💙
Justice for the 96 = achieved
Accountability? ....
Comment
-
Yes, Trevor Marriot (many apologies for having gotten the name wrong, as a newbie), I think he has written a book about Feigenbaum as a suspect (for which I'm sorry to say that I have profound reservations)?
Thank you so very much for the link, Mr. Carter, it looks like a discussion of Tumblety and Fenian activity, but I expect that Mr. Marriot's endeavor to get access into the classified Special Branch ledgers will turn up later in the discussion. I'll look it up in detail in a while, after finishing up some work.
Thank you so very much again, andBest regards,
Maria
Comment
-
Dear Mr. Carter,
FA-SCI-NA-TING. Thank you so very much again for directing me to this specific thread! I've only been through 2 pages yet but I'd like to ask: I see that Lindsay Clutterbuck was working for the RAND corporation, and (for very obvious reasons) it doesn't look like his dissertation was ever published. It appears like Mr. Marriot has either notes or a xerox copy of the thesis manuscript. I wonder in what length the information pertaining to the Whitechapel investigation is discussed in the thesis. From what Mr. Marriot says, it appears that the discussion in the dissertation is not very lengthy, and that primary sources have been totally left out, but yet again I imagine that the available information in this thesis can be used for the reconstruction of the “redacted“ parts of the ledges, that is, IF they ever become available to a researcher.
I can totally imagine what information the ledges might contain: I expect that they might mention Tumblety, a Jewish suspect, possibly even Le Grand? And I sincerely have no idea how Mr. Marriot can reconcile his interest for these ledges with (what I perceive to be) his interest in Karl Feigenbaum as a suspect, or so I've heard, at least!
By the by it's very unfortunate that Mr. Marriot seems to have retired from casebook threads after a recent argument in this very thread. I think it was in May or early June when he retired, I wasn't a casebook member then yet, but I remember perusing the thread.
Anyway, I've touched and perused some very valuable sources in my life (as a matter of fact, several of them were even located by myself), but even as a total non-specialist, my reaction to these ledges is...drooling.
The best of lucks with your appeal or (later) in court, Mr. Marriot!Best regards,
Maria
Comment
-
Originally posted by Robert View PostShe'll go all shy now.
Thanks everyone for the kind words, I wasn't fishing for compliments, just feeling a bit under pressure for not doing enough voluntary research!
Maria, Clutterbuck's thesis has been published, I have a copy myself sent to me by Rob Clack... unless there is another unpublished one?
It will be great if Trevor manages to get access to the SB Ledgers. I have dabbled in looking at a couple of the entries already known to us. The entries on Catherine Kelly and John Kelly taking up my time at the moment.
Comment
-
Hello Debra,
how nice that you have Clutterbuck's dissertation! (My big mistake for thinking it was unpublished, I only had time to check in several online bookstores, not in libraries. Also, Mr. Marriot talked about it quite secretively, so I was misled that it was a “forbidden book“!!) If you have perused it, does it discuss the information pertaining to the Whitechapel investigation, and does it mention Tumblety or a Jewish suspect at all? (But don't feel any obligations to reply to this question!)
Good luck with your research on the Kellys. When you say Catherine Kelly, do you mean Catherine Eddowes? (Apologies for the ignorant question!)Best regards,
Maria
Comment
-
Originally posted by mariab View PostHello Debra,
how nice that you have Clutterbuck's dissertation! (My big mistake for thinking it was unpublished, I only had time to check in several online bookstores, not in libraries. Also, Mr. Marriot talked about it quite secretively, so I was misled that it was a “forbidden book“!!) If you have perused it, does it discuss the information pertaining to the Whitechapel investigation, and does it mention Tumblety or a Jewish suspect at all? (But don't feel any obligations to reply to this question!)
Good luck with your research on the Kellys. When you say Catherine Kelly, do you mean Catherine Eddowes? (Apologies for the ignorant question!)
I mean the entry relating to Catherine Kelly and the murder of Mr Doughty, Maria.
Comment
-
Wow, thanks so much for the link to the Clutterbuck dissertation, Debra! (Now that I know that everybody and his cousin can download it, somehow my interest in this manuscript has subsided! Just kidding: I'm very curious to see what info it contains about the ledges. I'll most certainly look it up.)
Terribly sorry, no clue whatsoever about who this Catherine Kelly and the murdered Mr Doughty are. Certainly this is not about Thomas Doughty, in relation to Sir Francis Drake? If it's about a famous crime in Britain, I'm so sorry, I'm more familiar with American criminology!Best regards,
Maria
Comment
-
Hello Lynn,
still don't get it, unless you mean this as a joke. Nevermind, though!
By the way, I'm reading further in the June thread about the ledges, and it looks like the Clutterbuck dissertation only very marginally mentions the Whitechapel investigation, plus it looks like Clutterbuck didn't see anything about Tumblety in the ledges – or maybe he didn't recognize it. At some point I might feel like having a look at his thesis, but the really relevant source are the ledges themselves. So I wish the best of lucks to Mr. Marriot.
By the by, what are the 2 books by Fisherman about? (I almost feel compelled to ask if one of them is about fishing! No offense, Fish, just kidding here!)Last edited by mariab; 08-03-2010, 01:48 PM.Best regards,
Maria
Comment
-
Maria, Lynn isn't joking, none of us know what this reference relates to, but it has been suggested that it might relate to Catherine Eddowes...there I've said it!
I think he is joking about the other thing, it's just that I keep bending his ear over my own interpretation of what it might relate to, to get his (and Phil's) much needed input!
I must add here that my own ideas on the entry came about because of a very interesting find by Rob Clack about the murder of a Mr. Doherty. Thanks Rob!Last edited by Debra A; 08-03-2010, 03:14 PM.
Comment
Comment