Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Casebook Examiner No. 1 (April 2010)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • John Bennett
    replied
    Originally posted by Stewart P Evans View Post
    Animated mannikins? Less said the better!
    The man with the green face says "I bid you welcome to my dungeon..."! Cue spooky music.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hamrammr
    replied
    Originally posted by Stewart P Evans View Post
    The content and quality of the articles in this issue reinforce what I have claimed for some time now. This is a field of research in which there cannot be any single leading expert or authority.

    It is patently obvious that we have many experts (if you choose to use that word) on different aspects of Ripperological research. This is all to the greater good as new information on various characters, incidents and locations continues to be found and published. The subject can now be accommodated only on a medium such as the Internet as books are outdated as soon as they are published. The fast-moving cutting edge of Ripper research is graphically shown in The Casebook Examiner.

    I am not saying that books are totally out of date, but certainly there is less scope for factual works of reference.
    You're aboslutely right Stewart. With this subject at least it's very difficult to consider any factual work definitive as the 'facts' in the case and certainly the opinions seem to be in a constant state of flux. Saying that I'm sorely tempted to go into my local bookshop, remove all Ripper books (except for yours obviously) from the True Crime section, hide them somewhere (like under a stool or a child), then leave a note on the shelf saying 'Please refer to www.casebook.org.'

    Dean

    Leave a comment:


  • Hamrammr
    replied
    Many thanks for the excellent mag! Very honoured to receive it for free, especially considering how many paid-for magazines are total dreck. I will be putting my finger down my throat and coughing up some cash for future issues though. Outstanding work!


    Dean

    Leave a comment:


  • tji
    replied
    Hi all

    Great magazine thoroughly enjoyed it. I imagine a lot of man hours have gone into this so thank you.


    Hi Tom

    Well documented piece on Kidney, well done

    There are some details in your work that I wasn't aware of -they have gave me pause to think and delve a little deeper into the relationship between Kidney and Stride, so thanks.

    tj
    Last edited by tji; 04-15-2010, 01:38 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Good Michael
    replied
    Originally posted by Stewart P Evans View Post
    The subject can now be accommodated only on a medium such as the Internet as books are outdated as soon as they are published. The fast-moving cutting edge of Ripper research is graphically shown in The Casebook Examiner.
    That is a great and true statement, and applies to all subjects. As much as I like to sit and read a volume, I have become just as content printing off something from the internet and sitting down with it, much as I would with a good book. Surely the future of nonfiction is repositories such as Casebook, that are ongoing, ever-changing, and shared databases. We become the drones and always sup at the hive. I'm okay with that.

    Cheers,

    Mike

    Leave a comment:


  • Stewart P Evans
    replied
    Experts

    The content and quality of the articles in this issue reinforce what I have claimed for some time now. This is a field of research in which there cannot be any single leading expert or authority.

    It is patently obvious that we have many experts (if you choose to use that word) on different aspects of Ripperological research. This is all to the greater good as new information on various characters, incidents and locations continues to be found and published. The subject can now be accommodated only on a medium such as the Internet as books are outdated as soon as they are published. The fast-moving cutting edge of Ripper research is graphically shown in The Casebook Examiner.

    I am not saying that books are totally out of date, but certainly there is less scope for factual works of reference.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stewart P Evans
    replied
    Less Said

    Originally posted by Monty View Post
    We dont, though I still maintain X Factor is a far better programme than Strictly come dancing.
    On second thoughts, youd look good in sequins dancing the cha-cha-cha.
    Monty

    * Mental note. Must ask Stewart about collectables such as annimated manniquins.
    I agree, however I tried the sequins and I looked ridiculous. Animated mannikins? Less said the better!

    Leave a comment:


  • Monty
    replied
    Originally posted by Stewart P Evans View Post
    I didn't know that we disagreed that much.
    We dont, though I still maintain X Factor is a far better programme than Strictly come dancing.

    On second thoughts, youd look good in sequins dancing the cha-cha-cha.

    Monty



    * Mental note. Must ask Stewart about collectables such as annimated manniquins.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stewart P Evans
    replied
    Didn't Know

    Originally posted by Monty View Post
    Blimey Stewart, we are in agreement.
    Monty
    I didn't know that we disagreed that much.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stewart P Evans
    replied
    Excellent Read

    The whole issue was an excellent read. Congratulations to all who submitted the great articles. It will be a hard one to emulate.

    Leave a comment:


  • Roy Corduroy
    replied
    Neal and Jennifer's article has a neat surprise.

    Roy

    Leave a comment:


  • Monty
    replied
    Scott,

    Just do what Tom does, re hash.


    Tom,

    Just joking Sunshine.

    A wonderful article mate, excellent stuff.


    Examiner Editors,

    One Jack related connection with Leicester which was missed, though admittedly this hasnt been confirmed.....yet (Im working on it).

    In Leicester Cathederal (St Martins) is a plaque dedicated to a family name connected to the murders. The name is Mizen.

    Like I say, its something Im working on but not yet confirmed.

    Monty

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    This might be the most you've posted in one day! And you're full of doggie doo-doo, Scott. I'm sure you've got plenty of ideas you've never shared. If nothing else, you could coalate all your essays together into a single package with some additional stuff.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • Scott Nelson
    replied
    Thank you to Tom, Stewart and Neil. But I've run out of things to say on the Ripper. All I can do now is ask stupid questions and make lame jokes.

    Leave a comment:


  • DYLAN
    replied
    Great Stuff

    Hi Tom.

    I've just read your article on Michael Kidney.

    Great stuff.

    But then I wouldn't expect any less from you.

    Unfortunately, there is more chance of me winning the national lottery than there is of you getting through to Trevor and AP.

    Still, there's no harm in you trying.

    All the best.

    DYLAN

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X