Jack The Ripper - Double Cross

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lewis C
    Inspector
    • Dec 2022
    • 1204

    #16
    Originally posted by Geddy2112 View Post

    Thank you. I think that is astonishing to be honest. I mean in the same breath these people claim Cross' wife was not buried next to him because she knew he was a serial killer however they then claim none of his family knew he was involved. Which is it? Can't be both. Would his family not be able to realise if he went by the name Cross and his kids were called Lechmere that erm they were one in the same person? His family knowing or not know he was or was not involved is of no consequence and amazingly enough they would not be doing any arresting or hanging him for murder, the police would and they knew he was involved and they knew what he looked like.
    Can you imagine Abberline rocking up to 22 Doveton Street, knocking on the door with Charles answering saying 'We are here to arrest Charles Cross on suspicion of murder.' 'Oh sorry I'm Charles Lechmere, I know we look identical and live in the same house but it's not me.' 'Ah okay Mr Lechmere sorry to trouble you.' I mean what are those folk smoking? Have they been to Herlock Sholmes's Hawkwind gigs?
    Yes, his wife would have known that his stepfather was named Cross, and Charles sometimes went by the name of Cross. The commenter said that the police never learned that his name was Lechmere, but I don't think that we have any way of knowing that. We don't know if his children or grandchildren knew that he found Nichols' body. I think that he's assuming that they didn't know because his great great grandchildren didn't know, which is assuming a lot.

    He mentioned that only one paper gave his address, but didn't mention how many papers said that he worked for Pickford's.

    Comment

    • Geddy2112
      Inspector
      • Dec 2015
      • 1396

      #17
      Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
      To call Cross a suspect is pretty much a joke.

      “He was there, he was there, he was there!”
      You would not believe what Christer has posted in the comments section of this video. It's that bad I'm putting it up higher on the silly scale than the wearing of the apron at the inquest is a sign of guilt.
      Jack the Ripper - Double Cross

      Comment

      • Geddy2112
        Inspector
        • Dec 2015
        • 1396

        #18
        Originally posted by Lewis C View Post

        Yes, his wife would have known that his stepfather was named Cross, and Charles sometimes went by the name of Cross. The commenter said that the police never learned that his name was Lechmere, but I don't think that we have any way of knowing that. We don't know if his children or grandchildren knew that he found Nichols' body. I think that he's assuming that they didn't know because his great great grandchildren didn't know, which is assuming a lot.
        Well we do certainly know of one great great grandchild who knows about his involvement and that is Ed's missus. However we certainly have not seen any evidence any others know or do not know. We are just instructed they do not know. Which again is hardly a sign of guilt and that is the bigger picture here.

        Jack the Ripper - Double Cross

        Comment

        • Duran duren
          Constable
          • Apr 2024
          • 74

          #19
          Bought, thanks Geddy, and I loved the interview with you and Richard!
          " Still it is an error to argue in front of your data. You find yourself insensibly twisting them round to fit your theories."
          Sherlock Holmes
          ​​​​​

          Comment

          Working...
          X