[QUOTE=
The point is that the split of the photo really is not the issue here - if it wasn't the split photo, they would have come up with something else as an excuse in ordeer to discredit it.[/QUOTE]
Actually Glen, the only problem I have with the book is the split photo. Other than that it's very good. I didn't purposely buy the book with the intent of insulting it and had Phillip included a smaller complete photo of the original along with the split I wouldn't have complained at all.
The point is that the split of the photo really is not the issue here - if it wasn't the split photo, they would have come up with something else as an excuse in ordeer to discredit it.[/QUOTE]
Actually Glen, the only problem I have with the book is the split photo. Other than that it's very good. I didn't purposely buy the book with the intent of insulting it and had Phillip included a smaller complete photo of the original along with the split I wouldn't have complained at all.
Comment