A New Ripper Book

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Rob Clack
    replied
    Originally posted by Pirate Jack View Post
    In padding terms Rob this did set new records...there was some interesting photos in the first half however...
    Nothing I haven't seen before. In fact the Lantern and Slide used at the beginning reminded me of the 'Prince Eddy' program Channel 4 did a couple of years back. Looks like the same Lantern and slides that program used.

    Rob

    Leave a comment:


  • Gideon Fell
    replied
    Originally posted by Jane Welland View Post
    that the witnesses may all have been journalists, in fact. Yes, it's all becoming clear. Quality.
    Yes as clear as mud.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jane Welland
    replied
    I think..

    that the witnesses may all have been journalists, in fact. Yes, it's all becoming clear. Quality.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Leahy
    replied
    Originally posted by Rob Clack View Post
    Have to say I was very disappointed with the whole program. Kevin McKenzie did a "I've read a paragraph on Jack the Ripper somewhere, so I know everything there is to know about him" impression. And I wasn't convinced the Best/Dear Boss handwriting matched. I buggered up my recording of the program, but from what I remember on the Best handwriting there was a capital 'R' which looked nothing like the 'R' in Ripper.
    Have to try and catch a re-run to check.
    I watched the Rory McGrath 'Bloody Britain' episode on Jack the Ripper earlier today for the first time and I thought that was twice as good and it was only on for half the time.

    Rob
    In padding terms Rob this did set new records...there was some interesting photos in the first half however...

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Leahy
    replied
    Hi Baby bird

    yes this is a very good point, hard writing in 1888, was taught in a very different way....one of the comments made about the marginalia.

    I wasnt convinced by some of Quigley's comments but to be fair I'd like to see more. Have we actually identified Best? I was unclear what evidence was being presented about him...where did the new photo come from?

    Pirate

    PS please excuse my spelling I'm running on fast..

    Leave a comment:


  • Rob Clack
    replied
    Have to say I was very disappointed with the whole program. Kevin McKenzie did a "I've read a paragraph on Jack the Ripper somewhere, so I know everything there is to know about him" impression. And I wasn't convinced the Best/Dear Boss handwriting matched. I buggered up my recording of the program, but from what I remember on the Best handwriting there was a capital 'R' which looked nothing like the 'R' in Ripper.
    Have to try and catch a re-run to check.
    I watched the Rory McGrath 'Bloody Britain' episode on Jack the Ripper earlier today for the first time and I thought that was twice as good and it was only on for half the time.

    Rob

    Leave a comment:


  • Stephen Thomas
    replied
    Originally posted by Pirate Jack View Post
    1 hr...and we have a picture of someone they claim is Best? was it Best anyone?
    Well if it wasn't, them TV people are total tossers.

    Leave a comment:


  • Suzi
    replied
    Hi Jeff=
    At least we hung in there for the 9.o' clock rant 'eh!!


    We recorded it and am glad I did- not for the SCREAMING wrong bits but for the great shots of the Monopress and a great Zoetrope! Found myself having a complete tanty about THE WRONGS in it!!

    Best???- well he was obviously a dodgy character (graphologist joke there!) but the Ripper- I doubt it!

    The morgue shots are still tickling me though- not as much as Miss RADA though 'eh!!!


    Good to see Ripper stuff on the tele though- no matter how crap!!

    Suz xx

    I seeeeeeeeeees you BB!!!!!!!!!! I agree the daft graphologist/document examiner!!! did make me a LOT blesser- any form of Victorian hand would have had a passing 'er similarity FFS! Shame I've run out of acetates at work--- I may have missed an opportunity!!!!xxxxxxxx
    Last edited by Suzi; 06-24-2009, 11:40 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • babybird67
    replied
    ok

    sneaking in to put this post up...you 'aven't seen me, roight!

    Positives: seeing Don and Stewart and their contributions.

    Negatives: too much hype as usual over very little decent content. Ironic to have a programme criticising tabloid sensationalism, in a programme which was the visual equivalent of tabloid sensationalism. The summing up of: a mystery of 120 years has now been solved! Yes, of course it has...pack up everyone...

    Did anyone else watch the document examiner and her acetate matches and think...oh no, there are those same t's that Toppy/Hutch did/didn't use!!!! Back once again to the commonalities of literacy at the time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Leahy
    replied
    I made some notes on who it featured: Derek Pounder,Mathew Sweets, Andrew Cook, Christopher Frayling, Don Rumblow (Does he get sexier with age?), SPE (who looked terrified), Elaine Quiggly, and Dr Kate Williams

    I'm afraid I didn't recognise the tour guides?

    Pirate

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Leahy
    replied
    Sorry Suzi

    I posted on the other thread...what a dumbo..

    I was, well sort of happy that they didnt really say anything, but disappionted that another opportunity passed everyone bye..

    Is there much to say? apart from the poor girl from Rada laying on the slab......te hee

    Now if that was me directing I would have had San Flynn and an endelable Marker pen!!!

    1 hr...and we have a picture of someone they claim is Best? was it Best anyone?

    Pirate

    Leave a comment:


  • Suzi
    replied
    STARTED response to Prog here...

    Shall we keep it here- which it was where it started after all!!! xxxx(Hope that's OK!)

    Just checked- and the Andrew Cook thing did start here!!!
    Last edited by Suzi; 06-24-2009, 11:22 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Suzi
    replied
    Hi all-
    Just watched it (The BBC5 thingy!)....and have made a copy that I've offered to Howie- Well it was interesting in some ways -but there were some serious Aaaaaagh moments!!!!....Not going into them now but shall we say- the programme made some interesting viewing !!

    With cameos from Don and Stewart which were great!!

    - Am interested to know where they got that Monotype machine....the Zoetropes were great too... and we all know where the Andrew Cook interview was filmed!

    Hubby watched it with me (as a journo of MANY YEARS!!) and said they had a few points
    Hmmmmmmmmmmm

    The woman on the slab as a 'er victim made me smile- 5 yrs at RADA then to lie on a slab and try not to giggle when you have felt tips doing the lines of the wounds!!!!!

    The NEW newspaper headline was decidedly WEAK and I think the guy on the pc looked amused and bored to be honest!

    Not going to go into inaccuracies but it was sort of worth a watch!,,,Interesting points,,,,but am NOT totally convinced!!!

    Suz xx

    (PM me your mailing addy Arc and will sort one for you)

    Got your PM How.. have replied!)
    Last edited by Suzi; 06-24-2009, 11:16 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Archaic
    replied
    I'm in the States, so I guess i will be monitoring Youtube late tonight in the hopes that I can get at least a glimpse of the 'pirated' video before it's pulled.

    *Does anybody know when (or if) this show is slated to be aired in the U.S.?

    Regards, Archaic

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Leahy
    replied
    Just a quick reminder to those of you in the UK that channel five 8pm tonight Wednesday..is the braodcast of the program...I will be on casebook and jtrforums from nine O'clock. I'm interested in what you will make of it.

    Pirate

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X