Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
the victims werent prostitutes
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Simon Wood View PostHi Herlock,
The guest list was certainly interesting.
John McCarthy was neither a locally dignitary nor a prominent citizen. He was a slum landlord.
Regards,
Simon
Comment
-
Originally posted by Simon Wood View PostHi Herlock,
The guest list was certainly interesting.
John McCarthy was neither a locally dignitary nor a prominent citizen. He was a slum landlord.
Regards,
Simon
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Simon Wood View PostHi Herlock,
The guest list was certainly interesting.
John McCarthy was neither a locally dignitary nor a prominent citizen. He was a slum landlord.
Regards,
SimonRegards, Jon S.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Simon Wood View PostHi Mr Barnett,
Dignitaries and prominent citizens aren't all about money.
Regarding Trevor's comment about McCarthy being a Freemason, I wouldn't rule it out but cannot yet pinpoint him to a particular Lodge.
Regards,
Simon
My information is that it was Kings head Lodge
Comment
-
Perhaps McCarthy was a social-climber who had offered to contribute cash to the occasion. A bit of LVE ‘networking.’ Even a Slum Landlord might have wanted to present himself as a respectable businessman, pillar-of-the-community type worthy of respect. What better way than thanking a local Police Officer for his years of service?Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by Simon Wood View PostHi Mr Barnett,
Dignitaries and prominent citizens aren't all about money.
Regarding Trevor's comment about McCarthy being a Freemason, I wouldn't rule it out but cannot yet pinpoint him to a particular Lodge.
Regards,
Simon
Then there was the occasion when several of the 'Lords of Spitalfields' came to the assistance of William Thick when he was being attacked by a group of roughs.
So, McCarthy was not only a prominent local businessman, but also something of a philanthropist and a defender of the law - surely that cv alone would have got him a ticket to Abberline's do. And if he was a Freemason on top of it all, he'd be sure to get an invite.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View PostPerhaps McCarthy was a social-climber who had offered to contribute cash to the occasion. A bit of LVE ‘networking.’ Even a Slum Landlord might have wanted to present himself as a respectable businessman, pillar-of-the-community type worthy of respect. What better way than thanking a local Police Officer for his years of service?
There needn't be anything suspicious about McCarthy and his minor celeb son attending such an event.
Comment
-
Just as a side issue, one of the aspects of the case that has always raised my eyebrows is why did McCarthy allow Mary Kelly to run up such large rent arrears? It’s probably not a fact that he’d have wanted known. He wouldn’t have wanted to be known as a soft touch and I’m assuming that Mrs Mac might have wondered why he was allowing the young, attractive Mary to run up a debt (although do we know if she had any involvement in the business?)
I’m pretty rusty on this but what do we know of McCarthy that might hint toward his character?Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by Simon Wood View PostIndeed. Lord Salisbury owned decaying properties in Cecil Court, off the Charing Cross Road.
In the 1950s, the Church owned all the brothels in Sussex Gardens, Paddington. God moves in a mysterious way, His wonders to perform.
I recall going on a London Walk along the Thames and being told about ‘The Winchester Geese’ who were prostitutes in brothels owned by the Bishop Of Winchester in the 17th century. Pastoral care in the fullest sense.Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
Comment