-
JtRmap.com<< JtR Interactive Map
JtRmap FORM << Use this form to make suggestions for map annotations
---------------------------------------------------
JtR3d.com << JtR 3D & #VR Website
--------------------------------------------------- -
For me, this scarf is somewhere up there with The Jack The Ripper Diary. -
-
The subject being dragged in the mud whichever way you look. Edwards and the Cross crew.
Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”Comment
-
There's no evidence to link that shawl to Eddowes.
There's no testable DNA that oould have survived on that shawl
The shawl is open to cross contamination unless it is continuously stored in an airtight moisture free environment
it is impossible to precisely pinpoint and identify an individual through their DNA after so much relative time and generational separation
The Dott letter is a blatant fake that has been done to push the agenda
There is no evidence whatsoever that Kozminski was the Ripper
Based on all of that, there's bound to be a new inquest that concludes Kosminski was the Ripper.
Throw enough money at it and the British justice system will always find a way to blame whoever is pushed into the spotlight.
It would be great if a descendant of Kosminski fought back and was able to sue, for deformation of their ancestors character.
Such a pathetic and ridiculous episode.
it took me around 5 seconds of seeing and hearing the man holding that shawl to realise it's all a sham
Saddening, because the movement to persecute innocent men like Kosminski, Lechmere and Maybrick, is not about truth or justice; it's about men with little integrity and big egos, making money and becoming famous for telling lies.
Just like a politician.
"Great minds, don't think alike"Comment
-
There's also the issue that the DNA test that was given can only exclude a suspect from consideration. It can't identify a specific person.
We went through all of this several years ago. I don't understand why it's being talked about again now. As far as I can tell, there's no new evidence. Is it just because they've decided to hold a mock inquest? Based on evidence that was debunked years ago?Comment
-
One reason I liked the recent "The Trial of Jack the Ripper" was that the mock jury heard arguments against three suspects and chose the one they found most likely. Of course we can argue why these three and if they made the right decision, but at least they heard skilled arguments against three reasonable suspects.
The fact is, a skilled Ripperologist probably could get a mock jury to return an indictment against any single reasonable suspect. It's like reading a suspect book and becoming convinced that the suspect is Jack the Ripper, until you read another suspect book...Comment
Tweet
Comment