History Channel has been promoting this series for months, and the first of 8 episodes finally aired last night. I saw it, and felt it was just a lot of expository info that was nowhere close to the meat of their theory about H.H. Holmes being Jack the Ripper. My confidence is not that high that they will actually present acceptable arguments in the next 7 episodes to follow.
Two nights ago, they aired a documentary on a newly discovered photo of Amelia Earhart stranded on an island, only to have it embarrassingly debunked 2 days later by someone in Japan who took a mere *30 minutes* on a *publicly available* archival website to find the same photo that turned out to be, not a top secret never-before-seen item as History Channel had suggested, but just a mere travelogue photo! What's more, the caption of the photo says it was taken in 1935, two years BEFORE Earhart's disappearance. This has to be one of History Channel's biggest snafus ever. So I'm probably too optimistic to expect a half decent theory on H.H. Holmes.
Two nights ago, they aired a documentary on a newly discovered photo of Amelia Earhart stranded on an island, only to have it embarrassingly debunked 2 days later by someone in Japan who took a mere *30 minutes* on a *publicly available* archival website to find the same photo that turned out to be, not a top secret never-before-seen item as History Channel had suggested, but just a mere travelogue photo! What's more, the caption of the photo says it was taken in 1935, two years BEFORE Earhart's disappearance. This has to be one of History Channel's biggest snafus ever. So I'm probably too optimistic to expect a half decent theory on H.H. Holmes.
Comment