Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Packer Again

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Wickerman View Post


    He did though, see one couple standing around, but he didn't see anyone acting suspicious. I doubt he would think of a regular couple as suspicious. The police are obviously looking for a single male suspect - so he didn't see a single male standing around acting suspicious.
    Not really true, I would suggest that the police were looking for a man "chatting up" a woman, and that is what Packer's man was doing. Packer did say that the couple's behaviour was odd because they were standing around in the rain, and he claims to have watched them for some time. He was obviously very aware of them. So we have a man buying grapes for a woman, and then both of them hanging around the murder scene in the rain for some time, shortly before the murder. I think that was certainly worth mentioning to the police .

    Comment


    • #47
      Seems like they were waiting for someone!
      My name is Dave. You cannot reach me through Debs email account

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Doctored Whatsit View Post

        Not really true, I would suggest that the police were looking for a man "chatting up" a woman, and that is what Packer's man was doing. ...
        At this point in the investigation, based on precedent, the previous victims (Tabram & Nichols), had not been seen entertained, or being escorted by a man, minutes before their body was found, Chapman is a maybe (Mrs Long's sighting).
        Otherwise, the police had no cause to believe the killer "chatted up" his victim, it was just as likely this killer came out of the shadows to strike them down, a man alone looking for his next victim.
        I seem to recall this is how the press portrayed the monster, out looking for prey.

        At 9:00 am on Sunday morning, I don't think we can assume the police were looking for a couple, more likely a solitary suspect.
        The "couple" perspective only developed in the public eye (Packer's view) from the 4th Oct. the following Thursday.

        Last edited by Wickerman; Today, 02:17 PM.
        Regards, Jon S.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Wickerman View Post

          At this point in the investigation, based on precedent, the previous victims (Tabram & Nichols), had not been seen entertained, or being escorted by a man, minutes before their body was found, Chapman is a maybe (Mrs Long's sighting).
          Otherwise, the police had no cause to believe the killer "chatted up" his victim, it was just as likely this killer came out of the shadows to strike them down, a man alone looking for his next victim.
          I seem to recall this is how the press portrayed the monster, out looking for prey.

          At 9:00 am on Sunday morning, I don't think we can assume the police were looking for a couple, more likely a solitary suspect.
          The "couple" perspective only developed in the public eye (Packer's view) from the 4th Oct. the following Thursday.
          Sorry to disagree, but two witnesses who identified Stride, Wm Marshall and PC Smith, both said she was with a man, therefore the police would reasonably be looking for a couple.

          Comment

          Working...
          X