Originally posted by NotBlamedForNothing
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Stride Murder
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Doctored Whatsit View Post
Yes, just outside the club door. That would have been well past the body. I don't understand the continuing references to the "missing pony". He moved the pony and cart out of the way.
Wess: The distance from the gates to the kitchen door is 18 ft.Andrew's the man, who is not blamed for nothing
Comment
-
Originally posted by NotBlamedForNothing View Post
That's not quite answering my question. If the pony was outside the door, where was the cart in relation to the body?
Wess: The distance from the gates to the kitchen door is 18 ft.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Doctored Whatsit View Post
I assume it was sideways at about 90% to the door, or as near as he could manage. What is the point exactly?
I think it would be interesting to recreate the discovery, as closely as possible, and see if we learn anything. Would a pony in this hypothetical, shy to the left and then stand there calmly? I'll believe that that's what occurred, when I see it.Andrew's the man, who is not blamed for nothing
Comment
-
Originally posted by NotBlamedForNothing View Post
The pony and cart together would have been longer than the passage was wide.
I think it would be interesting to recreate the discovery, as closely as possible, and see if we learn anything. Would a pony in this hypothetical, shy to the left and then stand there calmly? I'll believe that that's what occurred, when I see it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Doctored Whatsit View Post
I think that I now understand your point, but surely if the pony was near the club door, and facing it, he wouldn't be troubled by the corpse.
Was the pony startled? If yes, how would it have reacted? Or did the pony calmy take a slight left turn?
I want to see this replicated as closely as possible, or at least hear from some animal experts on what they make of the evidence.Andrew's the man, who is not blamed for nothing
Comment
-
Originally posted by NotBlamedForNothing View Post
Presumably then, they were able to obtain additional facts and act further on the same information.
Is that due to the possibility he was in a different street?
Regards, Jon S.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GBinOz View Post
Hi Jon,
I think you have the right idea, but according to the Daily News and The Evening News of 1 Oct Diemshitz said:
Her hands were clenched, and when the doctor opened them I saw that she had been holding grapes in one hand and sweetmeats in the other.
As you know, Diemshitz (and Smith) mistook Johnson for Blackwell, so if the above is to be accepted, Spooner and Smith failed to see grapes in her hand, but one would imagine that Johnson might have commented on seeing grapes, but he testified that he did not notice at the time that one of the hands was smeared with blood, so he may have also missed the grapes. Alternatively, Diemshitz was mistaken on his timing.
Cheers, George
As both PC Lamb and Johnston commented on the blood being clotted, and they both held her hands, either one could have caused the transfer of clotted blood to her right hand. I just prefer the transfer was caused by PC Lamb, and Johnston, as you say above, missed it.Regards, Jon S.
Comment
-
It does seem increasingly likely that Schwartz may have the wrong street. Something is definitely amiss here which to be honest we seem to be struggling with. However we seem to be getting somewhere all be it slowly. I think Schwartz would have described the location as the working men's club or similar name when talking of the gateway. The club was very well known and I believe only the Saturday before William Morris had made a speech at the club. There were many prominent political speakers and music events held there. As you all know it was not a sleepy venue. However I believe the newspaper report says that he was lodging in Berners Street so something is wrong. Do we know what number he lived at. I know I must not assume things but surely he would have identified the location in his report to the press and police. NW
Comment
-
Originally posted by NotBlamedForNothing View Post
The pony and cart together would have been longer than the passage was wide.
I think it would be interesting to recreate the discovery, as closely as possible, and see if we learn anything. Would a pony in this hypothetical, shy to the left and then stand there calmly? I'll believe that that's what occurred, when I see it.
I've never understood the question about the horse, there is no consequence that I can see.Last edited by Wickerman; 10-01-2023, 02:00 PM.Regards, Jon S.
Comment
-
Originally posted by NotBlamedForNothing View Post
Diemschitz: All at once my pony shied at some object on the right.
Was the pony startled? If yes, how would it have reacted? Or did the pony calmy take a slight left turn?
I want to see this replicated as closely as possible, or at least hear from some animal experts on what they make of the evidence.
These costermonger's carts were two-wheeled affairs, about 6 ft wide, and as the gateway was only 9 ft wide, the cart enters down the center of the yard (barely 18" on either side), so if the horse had not shied away, the cart wheel could have struck the body.
What does the horse have to do with anything?Regards, Jon S.
Comment
-
Originally posted by NotBlamedForNothing View Post
So, if the pony was left just outside the club (door, I presume you mean), where was the cart left in relation to the body?
In other words, Diemschultx drove PAST Stride.
RD"Great minds, don't think alike"
Comment
-
Didn't Deiemschultz state or imply that he believed that the killer may have still been lurking further up in the yard, due to the reaction of the Pony? I got the impression that the Pony became unsettled.
The pony IS important, because presumably someone must have taken the Pony and Cart to the stable at the end of the yard after the body was discovered.
Now IF the killer was still lurking in the yard when Diemschultz pulled into the gateway, the ONLY time that the killer had to escape the yard, would have been the moment that Diemschultz went into the club door to find his wife.
Otherwise, the killer must have escaped SOUTH down Berner Street as the cart approached from the north.
OR, the killer managed to escape through the building (disused?) on the northern side of the yard, which ran across the back of the club and then got into the courtyard that then ran east to west from Backchruch Lane and back into Berner Street, and came out just around the house of Charles Letchford at no.30 Berner Street.
RD"Great minds, don't think alike"
Comment
-
Originally posted by New Waterloo View PostIt does seem increasingly likely that Schwartz may have the wrong street. Something is definitely amiss here which to be honest we seem to be struggling with. However we seem to be getting somewhere all be it slowly. I think Schwartz would have described the location as the working men's club or similar name when talking of the gateway. The club was very well known and I believe only the Saturday before William Morris had made a speech at the club. There were many prominent political speakers and music events held there. As you all know it was not a sleepy venue. However I believe the newspaper report says that he was lodging in Berners Street so something is wrong. Do we know what number he lived at. I know I must not assume things but surely he would have identified the location in his report to the press and police. NW
Both scenario's do not merge, there's no room around the 12:45 mark for Pipeman, BS-man & Schwartz to enter the scene between PC Smith, Mortimer, Eagle & Lave.
What we learn at the inquest does not marry with Schwartz's story.
Something, very simple, is wrong.
If we can identify the problem, so could the police. And, we do have expressions of doubt coming from police. They could see what we see, but they didn't try massage the two scenario's to make them fit. They didn't, because this is not how you deal with investigations.
The police accepted the presence of Parcel-man, he was their first published suspect - the man seen by PC Smith.
Later, BS-man & Pipeman were added, but then whispers of doubt began to emerge from police towards the latter two, we just don't know why.
I don't rule out the possibility the police discovered another altercation occurred in a nearby street and they may have pressed Schwartz to see if he was convinced which street he was in. Maybe they couldn't get confirmation from him.Regards, Jon S.
Comment
-
IF the killer was STILL lurking in the yard after the murder because Diemshcultz interrupted him, then the killer MUST have escaped when Diemschultz went into the club, because otherwise the killer would have been seen by the person who moved the horse and cart.
The other option of course, is that the killer went BACK INTO THE CLUB...and the only thing he had to do was to hide/dispose of the knife somewhere.
Perhaps when Eagle was sent to Leman Street, it gave him the chance to get rid of the knife he had just used on Stride?
Or Lave?
RD
RD"Great minds, don't think alike"
Comment
Comment