Originally posted by Tom_Wescott
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who was the best witness to have seen Jack the Ripper?
Collapse
X
-
It was as important as if he'd had a 'clerkly appearance', as that would have meant something back then. Look at the clothing items that Lawende describes for the man. Nothing particular 'sailor' about it, but it fit with how sailors dressed: low class but employed. Almost certainly it was the neckwear that made Lawende think 'sailor'. Take that off and you might have 'clerk'.
Yours truly,
Tom Wescott
Comment
-
Hi Jon,
Swanson most assuredly got "appearance of a sailor" from Lawende - that much is factually established.
Lawende obviously saw someone different from the "clerkly" man observed in Berner Street by Marshall and Smith (assuming they both saw the same man), but I see far fewer problems with Schwartz and Lawende potentially seeing the same person.
Best regards,
Ben
Comment
-
And Swanson noted that too, Ben. That's why he inserted Lawende's description into his HO report on the Stride murder.Best Wishes,
Hunter
____________________________________________
When evidence is not to be had, theories abound. Even the most plausible of them do not carry conviction- London Times Nov. 10.1888
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ben View PostHi Jon,
Swanson most assuredly got "appearance of a sailor" from Lawende - that much is factually established.
Lawende obviously saw someone different from the "clerkly" man observed in Berner Street by Marshall and Smith (assuming they both saw the same man), but I see far fewer problems with Schwartz and Lawende potentially seeing the same person.
Best regards,
Ben
Yours truly,
Tom Wescott
Comment
-
The best witness,if my belief is anythimg to go by,is either Pipeman,or BS.One can possibly understand the reluctance of BS to come forward,even if innocent,after Schwartz evidence became known,but how to prove innocence?Pipeman on the other hand,if innocent, had nothing to fear.Maybe what he was hiding,was more than a casual acquaintance with Stride.Perhaps her"Some other time'was an indication that her knowledge of the man she was seenwith(Pipeman?)made another meeting quite probable.
Comment
-
Clerks and sailors. Clerks and sailors. Bah.
It's the peaked cap folks.
Marshall, Schwartz and Lawendes all describe a man with a peak cap.
My money is the ripper was wearing a peaked cap that night.
Right? c'mon folks this isn't rocket science."Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
Comment
-
Originally posted by Abby Normal View PostClerks and sailors. Clerks and sailors. Bah.
It's the peaked cap folks.
Marshall, Schwartz and Lawendes all describe a man with a peak cap.
My money is the ripper was wearing a peaked cap that night.
Right? c'mon folks this isn't rocket science.
Mikehuh?
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Good Michael View PostWhat branch of the military?
Mike"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
Comment
-
Originally posted by Abby Normal View PostYour again missing the point. It's not what he was wearing to describe what his profession is. It's the fact that he was wearing a peaked cap that ties everything together and answers many of the questions about the night of the double event.
Just kiddin´, Abby - but peaked caps were very, very common back then. I´ve seen pictures of huge groups of men from the time, ninety per cent or more wearing peaked caps.
That´s not to say that the killer did not wear a peaked cap. I do believe he did.
The best,
Fisherman
Comment
-
Blotchy
Originally posted by Abby Normal View Postseriouly though. I think out of all the supects, that blotchy has the best chance of being the ripper, therefor Cox was most likely to see the ripper.
I also think that schwartz, marshall and lawende probably saw the ripper-the suspect i call peaked cap man, the night of the double event.
If blotchy was not the ripper, then sarah lewis probably saw the ripper in Mr. Waity Watchy, AKA as wide awake man, AKA hutch.
smith and long might have seen the ripper.
Blotchy man is a good call, Kelly was worse for wear through drink and it is unlikely she would have gone out again.
Did Blotchy stay or did he leave her and someone else enter her room?
cheers
Nick
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nick Spring View PostHi Abby,
Blotchy man is a good call, Kelly was worse for wear through drink and it is unlikely she would have gone out again.
Did Blotchy stay or did he leave her and someone else enter her room?
cheers
Nick
I agree. All circumstances are that she was not planning on going out again that night. I Beleive blotchy stayed and killed her and then left, probably around the four o clock time frame, but could have been earlier or later, but he was gone before the sun came up.
If it wasn't blotchy, then he left, and the killer went to her room, and again she was probably killed around fourish."Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
Comment
-
Originally posted by Abby Normal View PostYour again missing the point. It's not what he was wearing to describe what his profession is. It's the fact that he was wearing a peaked cap that ties everything together and answers many of the questions about the night of the double event.
Mikehuh?
Comment
-
provisions
Hello Abby.
"It's the fact that he was wearing a peaked cap that ties everything together and answers many of the questions about the night of the double event."
Correct, PROVIDED:
1. there were ONLY one out and about with a peaked cap
and
2. there is a link between being seen with someone and subsequently killing her.
Cheers.
LC
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Good Michael View PostPeaked caps were worn by the military for the most part, and sea captains. I know civilians wore them too, but they were definitely connected to the military...Best Wishes,
Hunter
____________________________________________
When evidence is not to be had, theories abound. Even the most plausible of them do not carry conviction- London Times Nov. 10.1888
Comment
Comment