Originally posted by Ben
View Post
According to the Times, Nov. 12th, Insp. Abberline did interview a "girl named Kennedy", so presumably he must have taken a statement from her.
This is interesting because, although no such statement has survived, we do know that Abberline also interviewed Sarah Lewis, this pre-inquest statement did survive (Ref. MJ/SPC, NE1888, Box 3, Case Paper 19).
We might wonder why the Times reporter would identify the interviewee as "Kennedy", yet Abberline wrote "Sarah Lewis" at the head of the statement, unless we are talking about two different people.
It could be said that Abberline saw that both testimonies were near enough identical so only one need be called at the Inquest. Perhaps he chose the most lucid testimony.
What also must be born in mind is that we learn that the police closed off Millers Court and kept everyone within until they had searched all the premises AND taken statements from ALL those present. The court was opened again about 5:30 pm on that same day, the 9th.
That being the case I don't understand how anyone can claim that one of the visitors was "chinese whispering" a story that had not yet hit the press!
All the residents and visitors were detained until they told their stories, it is those individual stories, one by Mrs Kennedy, the other by Mrs Lewis, that originated at this very moment.
Chinese Whispering doesn't even come into it..
Leave a comment: