No images here either.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
A photograph of Joseph Lawende in 1899
Collapse
X
-
Last edited by PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1; 03-04-2023, 09:55 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View PostNothing on your ‘salt and pepper’ point from ages ago I see.
I have found more than 15 such illustrations and am surprised that you could not find a single one among one hundred you viewed.
I am curious to know where you looked.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1 View Post
I thought you might have acknowledged by now that it was common for sailors in the nineteenth century to wear waist-length, loose jackets, which were open at the front, as I had previously stated.
I have found more than 15 such illustrations and am surprised that you could not find a single one among one hundred you viewed.
I am curious to know where you looked.
Thousands of different types of coat can be described as loose types and any coat ever made can be loose if it’s simply too big for the person wearing it.
You keep persisting with this non-point. Why don’t you get it.
Again…..utter silence on you ‘salt and pepper’ claims.
Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
Theres nothing to acknowledge. ‘Loose’ is not a type of coat. No shop assistant says “why style of coat are you looking for sir?” For a customer to reply “Loose.”
Thousands of different types of coat can be described as loose types and any coat ever made can be loose if it’s simply too big for the person wearing it.
You keep persisting with this non-point. Why don’t you get it.
Again…..utter silence on you ‘salt and pepper’ claims.
I have found many illustrations of sailors' jackets which were loose - i.e. they were open at the front and, except in a few cases, obviously not intended to be buttoned up.
I suggest that is obvious from the illustrations I have uploaded here.
Lawende described the suspect as having the appearance of a sailor and wearing a loose jacket.
I think anyone should be able to get my point.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1 View Post
I have found many illustrations of sailors' jackets which were loose - i.e. they were open at the front and, except in a few cases, obviously not intended to be buttoned up.
I suggest that is obvious from the illustrations I have uploaded here.
Lawende described the suspect as having the appearance of a sailor and wearing a loose jacket.
I think anyone should be able to get my point.
Here’s a thing PI - is there any chance of you, just for once, leaving aside the obfuscation and answering a question?
In your previous posting you tried to say that a ‘salt and pepper’ jacket was a particular type worn by sailers. I said that this wasn’t true and that ‘salt and pepper’ referred to the pattern of the cloth and that no pictures could be found anywhere of ‘salt and pepper’ jackets or of them being connected to sailors. I said that there was no such thing as a ‘salt and pepper’-type jacket. You simply wouldn’t accept it and just waffled on changing the subject just as your doing now.
So……can you provide the proof that there was such a type of jacket as a salt and pepper one and that, if there was, that ‘salt and pepper’ jackets were specifically (and by name) were connected to the Navy?
Will you give a full and proper answer?Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Please see my replies below.
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
A cap and a neckerchief might have given the impression to Lawende that the man had a vague appearance of a sailor but the fact of a poorly fitting jacket cannot be used.
I think you are quite obviously wrong on that point.
Anyone can see from the illustrations I have uploaded that it was common for sailors to wear waist-length, loose jackets, which were obviously not intended to be buttoned up, but NONE OF THE SAILORS IN THOSE ILLUSTRATIONS WORE A CAP.
You have repeatedly claimed an association between sailors and caps, but as far as I can see, there is not one.
Anyone can also see from the illustrations I have uploaded, as well as many others of sailors, that sailors commonly wore neckerchiefs.
I would suggest that it is clear that it was the loose jacket and neckerchief that caused Lawende to describe the man as having the appearance of a sailor, and not - as you think - the cap and neckerchief.
So……can you provide the proof that there was such a type of jacket as a salt and pepper one and that, if there was, that ‘salt and pepper’ jackets were specifically (and by name) were connected to the Navy?
Will you give a full and proper answer?
If I could provide proof, I would.
My source is someone who lived in Whitechapel and claimed to have seen sailors who wore loose waist-length pepper-and-salt jackets.
I have provided evidence that sailors wore loose waist-length jackets.
I have not so far come across salt-and-pepper ones.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1 View PostPlease see my replies below.
A ‘loose’ jacket isn’t a type of jacket.
A Victorian era Sailors cap - and please don’t try the cop out of mentioning the insignia, they can easily be removed. It doesn’t matter where it’s from either. A hat could be bought at any market or pawnshop.
Your point is about as reasonable as the one where you said that any Jewish man would have been readily identifiable as a Jewish man even after we had posted dozens of examples of Jewish men that didn’t look remotely Jewish.
Please don’t talk to me again on this subject. It’s barking mad, no one else will agree with you, but you keep on about it obsessively.
I repeat……it’s a non-point. With that…I’ll hand you over to anyone else who wants the headache.Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
Comment