Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fanny Mortimer

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Yep I think that comes under the work banner. I'm hoping to have NTSC copies available this week.

    Just to keep this on topic, Philip Hutchinson's tour takes in Berner Street in some detail and his excellent talk covers the only known photograph of the 'Stride Murder 'Location...Filmed in glorious HD and available via Adam Wood 5 hrs of Ripperology for only 15!

    Sales plug over, back to work..

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Pirate Jack View Post
      Thanks for that Rob most useful. i still cant figure what the circle represents on the map?
      Hi Jeff,

      It's a Hydrant.

      Rob

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Natalie Severn
        I had never heard it suggested Mortimer had a "young lady" Tom......no wonder his wife was at her door at midnight then-----she was probably keeping an eye on him!
        Hi Nats. Were you joking or have you really seen this somewhere? I've never heard of any such thing.

        Yours truly,

        Tom Wescott

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View Post
          Hi Nats. Were you joking or have you really seen this somewhere? I've never heard of any such thing.

          Yours truly,

          Tom Wescott
          It arose from me misreading one of your posts Tom!
          My bad,
          Cheers
          Nats

          Comment


          • #65
            Is there any evidence that Fanny Mortimer smoked pipes (or cigarettes)?
            Could she, in effect, have been Pipewoman?

            I would suppose she would have wanted to smoke outside, if she had an ill husband, inside.
            That might explain why she spends several unbroken minutes on her doorstep, each time she goes out.
            So I wonder, if she was a pipe smoker, how many times she refilled her pipe that night, and who might have seen her smoking it?
            Presumably not PC Smith, when he walked by with a measured, heavy tramp - because she was inside at that point - and I guess that is also why she also missed seeing Stride with the man holding the newspaper parcel.
            And yet she supposedly went outside, immediately after hearing Smith go by.
            So where had Stride and the man gone, so quickly?
            And why did they not move on, until after Smith had gone by?

            [E1004]
            Sir, - Will you allow me to support your suggestion of the advisability of the authorities to supply policemen on night duty with noiseless boots? I have frequently seen people meet after dark under suspicious-looking circumstances, disperse immediately on hearing the heavy measured tramp of an advancing policeman - whereas, if had had been in time to have seen what their little business really was. I firmly believe the noiseless booted policeman would greatly tend to diminish street lawlessness. - Yours faithfully,
            HENRY BAX 16, Lincoln's-inn-fields, W.C.
            Andrew's the man, that is not blamed for nothing

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by NotBlamedForNothing View Post
              Is there any evidence that Fanny Mortimer smoked pipes (or cigarettes)?[/I]
              No. No there isn't. But don't let it stop you.
              Them's the vagaries.

              Comment


              • #67
                I was really just wondering out loud, before I fell asleep.
                Just in the sense of how the recall of that spark of light might have helped corroborate certain witness accounts, if Fanny had been called to the inquest.
                Anyway, it was just idle thoughts.

                But now I'm wondering something else about Fanny's time on her doorstep - something I'm hoping you might be able to help me with...

                When do you suppose it actually occurred?
                By that I mean, not so much the exact time range, but more in terms of the sequence of events.

                Presumably Fanny's last doorstep vigil occurred after the Schwartz incident at 12:45.
                So I guess BS Man must have picked Stride up off the footway, taken her into the yard and killed her, by the time Fanny steps out.
                Presumably BS Man also flees before Fanny (or anyone else) has a chance to see him departing the scene.
                Thus Stride must lie dying and dead in the yard, for nigh on 15 minutes, without anyone noticing her until Louis arrives.

                If that is case though, who is responsible for the 'measured, heavy tramp' Fanny supposedly hears, and at what time does she hear it?
                If it is very reasonably due to Smith, and Smith walks by at 12:35 as he said he did, and Fanny immediately after this spends about 10 minutes on her doorstep, then what is the latest time she outside?
                If it is supposed (as many seem to), that Smith walks by at closer to 12:45 than 10 minutes prior, then is the man he sees with Stride - Parcel Man - also Broad-shouldered Man?
                So does Parcel/BS Man take Stride across to the gateway of the club, and then throw her down?
                Surely not, because that is not what Israel Schwartz sees - his 1st man approaches Stride who is already at the gates, and the man has nothing in his hands.
                So why is Parcel Man with Stride just before 12:45, but when Schwartz goes by, he is apparently nowhere to be seen?
                Where did go so quickly, and why was this after Smith goes by?
                And if Smith does go by at this later time, and Fanny goes out immediately after hearing his footsteps, why does Fanny not see Stride being thrown to the footway, taken into the yard, and then observe the man responsible for this, walk out of the yard and out of Berner street?

                It get even stranger (for me at least), when considering Smith's beat.
                He tells us it takes him 25 to 30 minutes to go around.
                So if Smith goes by just before a quarter to one - let's call it 12:42:30 - then he doesn't return until about 1:10.
                Is that about right?
                He tells us he witnesses the crowd outside the yard, from Commercial Road, at 1.00.
                Could he really be out by 10 minutes? That's 36% of the his beat's mean timespan.
                Smith tells us that he writes a report of what he has seen, after identifying Stride's body, then goes for an ambulance and sees Edward Johnston arriving, as he leaves.
                So what time does Johnston arrive?

                Furthermore, if Smith goes by just prior to 12:45, seeing Stride and Parcel Man on the opposite side to the club, and a few yards further up the street, then how does this scene morph so quickly into Stride being at the gates with BS Man approaching her, no sign of Parcel Man, and another man lighting his pipe, on the corner outside the pub?

                On the other hand, if Smith does go by at 12:35 as he testifies, and his beat takes about 27 minutes to complete, he does indeed see the crowd outside the gates at close 1 am, and when he arrives at the yard, Lamb and Collins are already there.
                In that case, how can Louis Diemschitz arrive at 1 am exactly, and if he actually arrived several minutes earlier, why does he give this exact time he claims to be sure of, and why doesn't Fanny see him arrive?
                Last edited by NotBlamedForNothing; 04-17-2020, 01:41 AM.
                Andrew's the man, that is not blamed for nothing

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Al Bundy's Eyes View Post

                  No. No there isn't. But don't let it stop you.
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	9353cb24270bc81b21e497e9c3b992f3--mtv-unplugged-miley-cyrus.jpg
Views:	130
Size:	27.8 KB
ID:	734573 Smokin' woman with the pony.
                  My name is Dave. You cannot reach me through Debs email account

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    That's about how tight the gap is for Israel Schwartz
                    Andrew's the man, that is not blamed for nothing

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Back on the road, Fanny Mortimer stated that she was at her door..."nearly the whole time" between 12:30 and 1am. She was at her door off and on until about "10 minutes to 1" she goes to the door and stays there until "1am". The quotes are being used because she said these things. She said she saw the man go by "hurriedly" around 12:55...he comes in and confirms that on Tuesday night. She sees the young couple, James Brown confirms that. What she doesn't see or hear is Louis arriving at 1, or anything Israel Schwartz claimed, or someone slipping out the gates.
                      Michael Richards

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        I know the quotes, and we've heard you say this stuff about 500 times.

                        Why don't you challenge yourself, for a change, and tell us what time PCs Collins, Lamb and Smith arrived?
                        Their reports clash with the times given by Diemschitz, Mortimer, and Goldstein, don't they?
                        Was it, for example, half an hour after Eagle 'couldn't be sure' there was nothing in the lane, so therefore there must have been a body there?
                        What happens in that half an hour period? A quick game of Scrabble, perhaps?

                        This is a problem that requires more than just copy & pastes of fragments of well known quotes.
                        It actually requires .... thinking.

                        By the way, there is no quote from Fanny that says 'She was at her door off and on until about "10 minutes to 1" she goes to the door and stays there until "1am".'
                        That is just a concoction of quotes and reports, that you've put together in your head.
                        If I'm wrong about that, then please provide the quote in full...
                        Andrew's the man, that is not blamed for nothing

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by NotBlamedForNothing View Post
                          I know the quotes, and we've heard you say this stuff about 500 times.

                          Why don't you challenge yourself, for a change, and tell us what time PCs Collins, Lamb and Smith arrived?
                          Their reports clash with the times given by Diemschitz, Mortimer, and Goldstein, don't they?
                          Was it, for example, half an hour after Eagle 'couldn't be sure' there was nothing in the lane, so therefore there must have been a body there?
                          What happens in that half an hour period? A quick game of Scrabble, perhaps?

                          This is a problem that requires more than just copy & pastes of fragments of well known quotes.
                          It actually requires .... thinking.

                          By the way, there is no quote from Fanny that says 'She was at her door off and on until about "10 minutes to 1" she goes to the door and stays there until "1am".'
                          That is just a concoction of quotes and reports, that you've put together in your head.
                          If I'm wrong about that, then please provide the quote in full...
                          I understand that folks don't seem to get the very simple premise quite well, but the times given by Louis and Eagle for when they left are likely accurate as can be expected. The only timing I dispute is the discovery of the body time and Louis's arrival times. I think that Eagle, Lave, Israel and Louis all are completely uncorroborated accounts for anything between 12:40 and 1am, and there are many accounts that are corroborated for 12:40-12:45, that match each other in both the relevant time and the activity witnessed.

                          As for off and on its essentially what is intended by the "nearly the whole time" line. And we have sporadic sightings throughout that last half hour, the young couple before 12:45.....Goldstein at 12:55.... which again supports the "off and on" I used...which I believe does in fact come from a report of an interview with her, it may have been the reporters summary though.

                          My whole contention here is that Louis arrived and discovered the body, sent for help upstairs, and that he and Kozebrodski, Gillen, Heschberg and Spooner were by the dying woman at approximately 12:45. Perhaps with others. That is precisely what the preponderance of the majority of the witnesses stated times suggests. That he didn't leave himself until after 1 is also supported, by several accounts including policemen. Time to stop assuming Louis and Issac K went out together after 1 because Louis says he went out with someone named Issac[s], time to stop assuming that Spooners times were incorrect because they match several other witnesses who said they saw the same tings at the same time around 12:40-12:45, time to stop believing Israel Schwartz has value here as a witness because the Inquest data doesn't have any mention at all of him or his evidence given that Sunday night, time to set aside belief that mentioning Schwartz later in unofficial documents suggests that he was still relevant for the same reason, time to stop ignoring that Morris Eagle and Lave also contradict several corroborated witnesses on times and events around 12:40-12:45 and themselves for not seeing each other while being in the same place at the same time. Time to stop reaching by suggesting Liz Stride was een by James Brown, he almost certainly did not..he saw the same young couple that has been established already as present on the street by Fanny, and time to stop giving Louis's stated arrival time any credence, its proven to be incorrect by all those corroborated witnesses and Fanny at her door until 1.

                          Lets move this investigation forward by not staying mired in provably incorrect dogma.
                          Michael Richards

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X