Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Could Jack have killed some of the torso victims?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • seanr
    replied
    Trevor Marriot's 'Jact the Ripper: The Real Truth' contains a story told to him, suggesting John McCarthy in collusion with Sir Edward Jenkinson hid a previous Ripper murder in Miller's Court, by dismembering the body and hiding in Whitehall. Essentially, an accusation from a member of the public that John McCarthy was behind the thw Whitehall Torso. Read his book to find out more - I don't want to give it away

    I find this story somewhat fantastic, but the thought had not struck me before reading this, that one of Torso bodies might have been a Ripper victim left at a lodging house which didn't want to be involved in the investigation. I'd probably consider the Pinchin Street Torso to be more likely than the Whitehall victim.

    I'm not convinced I believe this, but it's a thought.

    Leave a comment:


  • Joshua Rogan
    replied
    Originally posted by jerryd View Post

    Forbes Winslow was a direct descendant of a Pilgrim Father. Edward Winslow sailed on the Mayflower and signed the Mayflower Compact with his brother, Gilbert.
    Excellent jerry!

    A couple more digressions and we'll be right back on topic again.

    Leave a comment:


  • jerryd
    replied
    Originally posted by Joshua Rogan View Post

    Or perhaps both, since I believe the Pilgrim Fathers lived in the Netherlands before sailing for the new world.
    ​​​​​
    Forbes Winslow was a direct descendant of a Pilgrim Father. Edward Winslow sailed on the Mayflower and signed the Mayflower Compact with his brother, Gilbert.

    Leave a comment:


  • Joshua Rogan
    replied
    Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
    it's perhaps a coin-toss as to whether it was the Dutch or the Pilgrim Fathers who introduced the word to America.
    Or perhaps both, since I believe the Pilgrim Fathers lived in the Netherlands before sailing for the new world.
    ​​​​​

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Originally posted by APerno View Post
    My fault, sorry about that.
    No probs. You asked some interesting questions

    Leave a comment:


  • APerno
    replied
    My fault, sorry about that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Sorry, just realised that this thread's gone a wee bit off-topic.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    The idea that the author was American extended beyond the police, as these two letters published in the Evening News on Oct 8th 1888 illustrate:

    Sir - I have been considered somewhat of an expert in handwriting, and having carefully examined the facsimile of the letter you published a couple of days ago, signed "Jack the Ripper," have no hesitation in saying that it bears every evidence of being American - what is known in the States as the Spenserian style - the capitals especially bear out this idea, not only so, but the whole phraseology is Yankee, and it would indeed be strange should it eventually prove to be the work of the real murderer himself, and the more so should the monster fiend turn out to be the same inhuman wretch who perpetrated a series of similar horrible crimes in Texas some time ago. At all events the hint might be worth looking into, and every American of a suspicious character watched.

    I am, &c.,
    G.E.
    October 7.


    Sir - I have examined the writing with the facsimile letters of "Jack the Ripper" in your issue of the 4th inst., and am perfectly satisfied that the writer was educated in the public schools of one of the Southwestern States of America. I judge that from the writing, and the expressions used. I am of opinion that he is of the mechanic class, and that the police had better look for him in one of the better class lodging houses or third class hotels, since men of his class in America would not sleep in the dens of Whitechapel. Having seen a great deal of American life, and having observed the mechanical class during investigations into industrial pursuits in that country, I feel sure that I am right. The man has been, in my opinion, infatuated with some women of the town. who first robbed him, and then deserted him, and this is his revenge.

    I am, &c.,
    An Observer.

    Leave a comment:


  • APerno
    replied
    OK, I am sorry I got you guys going on this, but why then did CID believe the letter may have been written by an American?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Interesting. The OED gives its etymology as deriving from the Dutch baas (master), with American citations dating back to the 17th century. That being the case, it's perhaps a coin-toss as to whether it was the Dutch or the Pilgrim Fathers who introduced the word to America.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wickerman
    replied
    Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
    Hello APerno

    It wasn't that "ha! ha!" is/was an Americanism, but "boss" was. (Not that it was unheard of in Britain, but it originated, and was more commonly used, in America.)
    Point of trivia here Gareth.
    Years ago I researched the story of Mathew Hopkins, aka, Witchfinder General. Back in the day in East Anglia calling someone "Boss" was quite common, it was an English expression that migrated to the US with the Pilgrim Fathers.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Hello APerno

    It wasn't that "ha! ha!" is/was an Americanism, but "boss" was. (Not that it was unheard of in Britain, but it originated, and was more commonly used, in America.)

    Leave a comment:


  • APerno
    replied
    Yea there is no way to know if an American newspaper editor altered the spelling of "moustache" or not. Does anyone know if this letter is archived in the Casebook inventory?

    I am surprised to learn that there are several letters all originating from Portsmouth (I never knew that) and that a Portsmouth boy was found with his throat slit is interesting considering there was also an attack on an adolescent boy in the London area (who was also dismembered and scattered about).

    Referring back to the original Dear Boss letter, didn't the police react to the use of "HA! HA! as being an Americanism and sent them off interviewing Americans (cowboys and Indians from a wild west show that was currently performing in the London area?)

    Can any of the Brits enlighten me if this is true: that "HA! HA!" is not a common British slang term?

    P.S. How come Casebook's spell check recognizes "mustache" but does not recognize "moustache" ? -- Same with "color" and "colour" I assume Casebook originates from England but I guess the software comes from the States.

    Leave a comment:


  • Joshua Rogan
    replied
    Mmm, intreresting. I can"t find the letter with a cursory search in Letter's from Hell, nor the press reports, but there are a couple of possibly related letters from around the same time.

    Firstly, it may be worth noting that a young boy - Percy Serle - had his throat cut in the street in Portsmouth on the 26th Nov, just two days before this letter was written.

    The Morning Advertiser 29th Nov carries the following letter, which may refer to the Portsmouth letter, and be by the same writer;
    "Mr. Saunders, the presiding magistrate, yesterday received a letter purporting to come from "jack the Ripper," which bore the Hastings post mark, and which was addressed to "Head Magistrate, Police Court, Whitechapel." It read as follows:

    "Dear Boss,

    It is no use looking for me in London or in Portsmouth, for I have reached Hastings now, but I shant be long before I get in London again, back to my work again, but not the man with the black moustache. Ha! ha! ha!

    Yours, ‘JACK THE RIPPER’""

    nb. different spelling of moustache, though.

    The same paper also refers to a letter to the Staffordshire Constabulary, whose writer threatens to cut the arms off his next victim.

    As Sam has pointed out, the Pinchin St Torso had the head and legs removed, not the head and arms, but a (hastily written) letter from Paddington dated 20th (or 24th) November says "I am going to her head off and her legs off" the next victim.

    A letter from Manchester 22 Nov purports to be from Jack and mentions an earlier letter signed J Ripper from Portsmouth written shortly after the Kelly murder. But I'm not sure whether he's claiming credit for it or claiming that it's a fake.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Originally posted by APerno View Post
    It is as though he is promising us there will be a Pinchin Street torso.
    Thanks - a new one on me, and intriguing, although if it had said "head and legs" it'd have been nearer the mark for Pinchin. Also, given that the writer was clearly gloating over the Ripper's dismantling of Mary Kelly, it might well be that the author had in mind a thorough cutting-up of a body in situ, rather than depositing a torso as such.

    Interesting that "mustache" is spelled the American way in this transcript. Was it thus written in the original letter, I wonder?
    it is obviously a clip from a London newspaper
    I'm not so sure about that.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X