Originally posted by Trevor Marriott
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
JtR failed amputation. Torso killer was successful.
Collapse
X
-
Kind regards, Sam Flynn
"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
-
Originally posted by Harry D View PostWhat reason would a rogue mortuary assistant have for stealing a single kidney?Kind regards, Sam Flynn
"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View PostLets put the record straight, there is no suggestion that a rogue mortuary attendant was responsible for physically removing the organs at the mortuary. Such a person would be incapable of effecting such a removal.Kind regards, Sam Flynn
"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View PostConversely, Where is the evidence that the killer took them ?
There is none only inferences !
www.trevormarriott.co.uk
Comment
-
Originally posted by Michael W Richards View PostWhen Bagster observed that some items had been excised, Im inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.Kind regards, Sam Flynn
"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View PostThe killer mutilated the abdomens, there was no precision shown in those mutilations. Had there been so it might have been easier to suggest organ harvesting was part of the motive.Kind regards, Sam Flynn
"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View PostThe killer mutilated the abdomens, there was no precision shown in those mutilations. Had there been so it might have been easier to suggest organ harvesting was part of the motive.
Yes it is case closed as far as i am concerned, there is no argument.
The organs were not found to be missing until the post mortems, many hours after the bodies had been left there.
You are another one on here who should take time to read my revised edition of Jack the Ripper The Real Truth. things may become clearer to one and all, but then again I doubt that, Now available in paperback, go on treat yourself you might learn something !
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fisherman View PostThat's what it all boils down to it would seem - an effort to flog your book? Well, flog away - I have no interest at all to prolong any discussion that could in any way encourage anybody to make that purchase and so I'm off.
As Jack Nicholson said in the film A few good men, "The truth, you cant handle the truth" never more true words spoken
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sam Flynn View PostPrecisely. And why not take (both) kidneys from the other victims, too, if he had time and privacy on his side? Why not do a better, more consistent, job on the uteri and bladders?
Why take another uterus when you already have one if you are the killer?
Why not take organs from any of the other victims, if you are the killer?
Two different mortuaries,
two different methods of extraction of the uterus from both victims
two different persons responsible?
Both victims left for some considerable time before post mortems carried out
Bona fide medical persons would have access to the mortuaries for the purpose of lawfully obtaining organs for medical researche/teaching.
You really need to take a step back and look at the full picture, especially with regards to Eddowes and Mitre Square, there lies the evidence to prove my case.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View PostThats it run away from the truth !
As Jack Nicholson said in the film A few good men, "The truth, you cant handle the truth" never more true words spoken
www.trevormarriott.co.uk
How thick is your book please ?
It might be just what I need to prop up my old coffee table
Comment
-
Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View PostConversely why didnt the killer do all that you quote ?
Why not take organs from any of the other victims, if you are the killer?Kind regards, Sam Flynn
"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Jon Guy View PostHi Trev
How thick is your book please ?
It might be just what I need to prop up my old coffee table
But of course to read it you would have to have a full understanding of how to interpret facts and evidence. So perhaps it is not a good idea for you and some other on here to buy it.
But for those with more than one brain cell its a terrific read !
Comment
-
Originally posted by Batman View PostHey Trevor, a quick question about your literary research and publications.
Do you believe the Apollo moon landing of 1969 is a hoax? I know it's off-topic but if you would oblige, thanks.
Based on my research, I am not able to give a definitive answer
There is plenty of evidence in the public domain to support those who say it was a hoax, and those who say it was not.
Comment
Comment