Why NOT??

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Stewart P Evans
    replied
    Ripperology

    Originally posted by robhouse View Post
    According to the Observer Dr. Killeen (at the inquest) noted that “there was a deal of blood between the legs, which were separated.”
    Also... as far as I can tell, the time of Tabram's death was sometime between 2 AM and 3:30 AM. Killeen estimated that the woman had been dead for about 3 hours when he arrived at 5:30, but this clearly might not be accurate... hence the appearance of a soldier at George Yard at 2AM may or may not be related to the murder, depending on how accurate Killeen's estimate was.
    RH
    He's not likely to have stepped in blood between her legs. That's one 'as far as I can tell', one 'might not', one 'may', one 'may not', and a 'depending on.' Sounds about par for the course in working things out in Ripperology. However, Killeen did give his estimate of time of death as 2.30 a.m. and I would presume that he had more to work on in giving that estimate than you do Rob. Also this timeline puts a soldier in the close vicinity of where Tabram's body was found much more conclusively than Connelly's last sighting of her going 'up George Yard' with the private at 11.45 p.m., which is the time usually quoted by those who do not wish Tabram's killer to be an unknown soldier.

    Leave a comment:


  • KatBradshaw
    replied
    I guess the issue is how long would he have decided to wait for the mate!

    Leave a comment:


  • robhouse
    replied
    Just a little follow up point...

    Let's say Killeen was off by just a half hour, and Tabram was actually murdered around 3 AM. This is entirely plausible. If this was this case, how relevant is the soldier who was seen waiting for a friend at around 2 AM?

    I would argue... not so much. An hour is quite a long time.

    RH

    Leave a comment:


  • KatBradshaw
    replied
    I have to addmit that I can't see Martha being so popular that she found someone else after 30 mins.

    Leave a comment:


  • robhouse
    replied
    According to the Observer Dr. Killeen (at the inquest) noted that “there was a deal of blood between the legs, which were separated.”

    Also... as far as I can tell, the time of Tabram's death was sometime between 2 AM and 3:30 AM. Killeen estimated that the woman had been dead for about 3 hours when he arrived at 5:30, but this clearly might not be accurate... hence the appearance of a soldier at George Yard at 2AM may or may not be related to the murder, depending on how accurate Killeen's estimate was.

    RH

    Leave a comment:


  • KatBradshaw
    replied
    Originally posted by Phil Carter View Post
    Hello Kate,

    The clean version? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FiWJWLCoH2M

    Or the grown-up version? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qffCXkhodks

    best wishes

    Phil

    (Apologies for the divertion, pray, continue all)
    I only like the clean version! I am a good girl.

    Leave a comment:


  • Phil Carter
    replied
    Hello Kate,

    The clean version? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FiWJWLCoH2M

    Or the grown-up version? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qffCXkhodks

    best wishes

    Phil

    (Apologies for the divertion, pray, continue all)

    Leave a comment:


  • KatBradshaw
    replied
    Excellent film!! There should be a Rowan Atkinson style register of Ripperologists. Imagine,

    Begg,
    Clack,
    Fido,
    Evans,
    Hutchinson,

    Clack! Clack! Leave Fido alone!

    Leave a comment:


  • Phil Carter
    replied
    Hello Stewart, Kate,

    Re silly...

    Now why does the picture of John Cleese's Headmaster from the film "Clockwise" spring to mind?

    best wishes

    Phil

    Lower 6th form, studying "A-level" "Silliness in the LVP".
    Last edited by Phil Carter; 10-29-2010, 09:17 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • KatBradshaw
    replied
    Originally posted by Stewart P Evans View Post
    Yes, I am, it must have rubbed off on me.
    Nowt wrong with a bit of silliness.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stewart P Evans
    replied
    Yes

    Originally posted by KatBradshaw View Post
    Now you are just being silly!
    Yes, I am, it must have rubbed off on me.

    Leave a comment:


  • c.d.
    replied
    Ok. Thanks, Stewart. I had assumed that there would have been blood on the ground and that her killer stepped in it and thus left prints.

    c.d.

    Leave a comment:


  • KatBradshaw
    replied
    Originally posted by Stewart P Evans View Post
    It was probably written in the stars....
    Now you are just being silly!

    Leave a comment:


  • KatBradshaw
    replied
    In the case of all the murders the killer does seem to have been able to avoid enough blood not to bring attention to himself so I am guessing he would have been carefull not to tread it in.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stewart P Evans
    replied
    In the Stars

    Originally posted by KatBradshaw View Post
    But WHY??
    Is there a socio-economic reason?? Its not an accident that in times of financial difficulties people go over to more right wing politics so is there something like which can affect murder rates??
    It was probably written in the stars....

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X