Richard,
this really does look great
my view is that given the various suggestions you have been given, none of which can be proved to be 100% acurate, what you have produced is the best possible fit.
Any changes which are suggested, unless they come from a professional such as architect, insurance map company or even a building Facility manager (basically some one who studies this sort of thing in their employment), are best avoided.
Such changes will be based on the whims of whoever puts them forward, that is not just aimed at Pierre, but everyone.
If of course any suggestion for change/improvement could be agreed upon by most, if not all, then of course incorporate it.
How about Goad 2 and 3 as a base , and if there is a consensus for a change and you are happy to produce an alternative have a Goad 3B.
Elamarna
this really does look great
my view is that given the various suggestions you have been given, none of which can be proved to be 100% acurate, what you have produced is the best possible fit.
Any changes which are suggested, unless they come from a professional such as architect, insurance map company or even a building Facility manager (basically some one who studies this sort of thing in their employment), are best avoided.
Such changes will be based on the whims of whoever puts them forward, that is not just aimed at Pierre, but everyone.
If of course any suggestion for change/improvement could be agreed upon by most, if not all, then of course incorporate it.
How about Goad 2 and 3 as a base , and if there is a consensus for a change and you are happy to produce an alternative have a Goad 3B.
Elamarna
Comment