Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

'oh Murder'

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Edward View Post

    Wickerman
    I agree that the two windows are very odd. It has always seemed strange to me. However, if the smaller window had formerly been a door, that would place two doors only a few feet apart, which would also be pretty odd. Perhaps I’m not visualizing the location of your suggested partition correctly.
    Yes, I doubt two doors existed at the same time.
    If there had been a partition between the two windows then the resulting narrow portion would have been a passage with no light, unless the current side door had originally been a side window.
    Possibly different modifications by various owners over decades.

    ... and any cry of “Oh Murder” would have been muffled, and not sound as if, as Prater described, “It seemed to proceed from the court”. (Prater inquest testimony).
    Strange she would be able to determine the direction of the cry, if as was reported in the Daily Telegraph: "Elizabeth Prater, the occupant of the first floor front room,...".
    That places her room facing Dorset St., which is possibly confirmed by The Star: "She lived in No. 13 room, and mine is No. 20, which is almost over hers."
    Perhaps it was merely the fact the cry was faint that she assumed it came from behind the house, if louder she may have assumed it came from Dorset St.?
    Wouldn't we expect the cry to have been loudest if it came from within the house?
    Regards, Jon S.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Wickerman View Post
      Strange she would be able to determine the direction of the cry, if as was reported in the Daily Telegraph: "Elizabeth Prater, the occupant of the first floor front room,...".
      That places her room facing Dorset St., which is possibly confirmed by The Star: "She lived in No. 13 room, and mine is No. 20, which is almost over hers."
      It's even better-confirmed by the Telegraph's report of the Inquest: "I live at 20 Room, in Miller's-court, above the shed" - the "shed", of course, being McCarthy's store-room at the front of the house. This is backed up by the same paper's interview with Prater on the 10th November, which you quote above.

      Nothing strange about her being able to detect the cry, however. Even if she was in the first floor front room (which I'm certain she was), Prater ought to have been able to "triangulate" the sound, and establish that it came from the rear of the house, rather than from the direction of Dorset Street.
      Kind regards, Sam Flynn

      "Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
        .... Prater ought to have been able to "triangulate" the sound, and establish that it came from the rear of the house, rather than from the direction of Dorset Street.
        I would like to know what woke the kitten, it seems coincidental that the kitten wakes her, and then she hears the cry. Perhaps she didn't hear a first noise, but the kitten did?

        Do we have a statement from Tiddles?
        Regards, Jon S.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Wickerman View Post
          I would like to know what woke the kitten, it seems coincidental that the kitten wakes her, and then she hears the cry. Perhaps she didn't hear a first noise, but the kitten did?

          Do we have a statement from Tiddles?
          Yes Jon Diddles said Meow Purrrrrrrrrrr.

          But I tend to agree the cat probably did hear or sense something.
          G U T

          There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Wickerman View Post
            Do we have a statement from Tiddles?
            Not a word, Jon. Cat got her tongue.
            Kind regards, Sam Flynn

            "Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)

            Comment


            • #66
              I was looking at court precedings, looking at any crimes that may have a connection with the JTR case and came across a case involving a David Thomas Davies. He had feloniously harmed Catherine Davies. What interested me about this case was what the defendant had screamed out and what she was heard screaming, when being attacked: ‘help and murder‘. Could it be possible that MJK had tried to say help, which hadn’t been heard, and then shouted murder? Just thought it was quite interesting.

              Also while on the subject of court precedings, I saw another case involving Jane, Mary & Johanna Smith. Johanna Smith was going to get engaged to a William Albert Rayner, but she broke of the engagement in November 1887. Johanna said she didn’t want anything to do with him, despite him going round the house asking to talk to her. He went round the house with a gun and Mary ended up getting shot. William Rayner was found guilty of wounding with intent to do GBH and was sentenced to 10 years penal service servitude. I don’t think Rayner had anything to do with MJKs death.
              This case made me wonder if MJKs death was connected to something important to the killer, maybe an anniversary. If it was a crime of passion it would explain the missing heart, if indeed it was missing from the scene

              I checked up on the census and found Mary & Johanna couldn’t find Jane after 1881 though. Just thought that was quite interesting

              Comment


              • #67
                Remember Diddles was born in Bethnal Green.
                I'm not surprised he didn't come forward.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by DVV View Post
                  Remember Diddles was born in Bethnal Green.
                  I'm not surprised he didn't come forward.
                  Hi DVV

                  Diddles was actually quite sensible, he went straight home rather then going to check out any noise. So in that case curiosity didn't kill the cat

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Natasha View Post
                    Hi DVV

                    Diddles was actually quite sensible, he went straight home rather then going to check out any noise. So in that case curiosity didn't kill the cat
                    My dear Natasha, I'm afraid I have to disagree.

                    Fleming wouldn't kill a cat with whom he had played coconut shy in Bethnal Green so many times.
                    Diddles knew that.

                    Now if you have guts, start a thread called "The feline Bethnal Green cover-up".

                    And expect many posts from my friends Cates and Carter.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      You may fear Fisherman's reaction, who for sure will challenge you to provide Diddles' birth certificate, census records, etc.

                      But don't worry. He's holydaying in North Korea all summer.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by DVV View Post
                        My dear Natasha, I'm afraid I have to disagree.

                        Fleming wouldn't kill a cat with whom he had played coconut shy in Bethnal Green so many times.
                        Diddles knew that.

                        Now if you have guts, start a thread called "The feline Bethnal Green cover-up".

                        And expect many posts from my friends Cates and Carter.
                        Hi DVV

                        People & cats are expendable, its in the interest of the criminal to cut all ties with anything that may pose a threat. I like the idea of that thread, Why don't you start it

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Because I want to keep all this material for my book, Nat.
                          It's called "Jack the Ripper. Cat solved."

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Hi,

                            I think the thing about the cry is that you have to consider pitch when trying to decide if people can pin point directions accurately.

                            A frightened cry, for instance, I would suggest, would be at a higher pitch that a cry of surprise.

                            The higher the pitch, the more relaible the identification.

                            Therfore, it could be possible that the pitch was low, and so was difficult to discern its origin.

                            Just a thought

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by DVV View Post
                              You may fear Fisherman's reaction, who for sure will challenge you to provide Diddles' birth certificate, census records, etc.

                              But don't worry. He's holydaying in North Korea all summer.
                              I was indeed worried about that, as I suspect Diddle's statement was destroyed due to some conspiracy cover up

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by DVV View Post
                                Because I want to keep all this material for my book, Nat.
                                It's called "Jack the Ripper. Cat solved."
                                Can't wait to buy that

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X