Hi,
Mrs Maxwell's statement has always bothered me, even more so recently,when it came to light that a letter to a police force was allegedly penned from the very address she resided , exactly one week prior to Kelly's death.
We have a woman claiming to have seen someone some 4 hours after medical reports of T.O.D, who remained adamant even at the inquest when warned to think carefully.
She swore under oath that her sighting was authentic.
We therefore have a witness who went against all medical reports, and maintained the impossible.
Yes she may have confused the time, although she gave her statement on the 9th November, just hours after the body was discovered, not to mention verification by shopkeepers who she visited.
Yes she may have confused the identity, even though she claimed to have known Barnett, and had plenty of time at the inquest to alter her statement when she would have discovered any mistake.also she had the entire weekend before the inquest to realize any error.
Some of us[ me included[ have suggested that Maxwell did actual see Kelly alive at 830am but the general feeling on Casebook is.. this was not the case.
So If the majority are right, is their another reason for the highly surprising admission by this witness?
Was she Lying?
Taking a speculative view, one would suggest that she would have had one main reasons for doing this.
To lead the police to the view, that the murder happened at a later date in order to possibly protect someone.? someone who had no alibi for the hours of darkness.
The police appeared at least initially to believe that the murder took place in daylight, and they also believed that the killer had someone who assisted them.
The letter sent to the Norfolk police, which comes across as a hoax, many of us dismiss, as it is out of area, but the fact remains that it states it was from 14, Dorset Street, the very house that the witness Maxwell lived in, which leaves one to conclude that it is indeed a ''small world''.
Coincidences do occur, but one week prior to a Ripper murder, sent from a residence right opposite the murder scene , shows incredible foresight ..don't you think?
Regards Richard.
Mrs Maxwell's statement has always bothered me, even more so recently,when it came to light that a letter to a police force was allegedly penned from the very address she resided , exactly one week prior to Kelly's death.
We have a woman claiming to have seen someone some 4 hours after medical reports of T.O.D, who remained adamant even at the inquest when warned to think carefully.
She swore under oath that her sighting was authentic.
We therefore have a witness who went against all medical reports, and maintained the impossible.
Yes she may have confused the time, although she gave her statement on the 9th November, just hours after the body was discovered, not to mention verification by shopkeepers who she visited.
Yes she may have confused the identity, even though she claimed to have known Barnett, and had plenty of time at the inquest to alter her statement when she would have discovered any mistake.also she had the entire weekend before the inquest to realize any error.
Some of us[ me included[ have suggested that Maxwell did actual see Kelly alive at 830am but the general feeling on Casebook is.. this was not the case.
So If the majority are right, is their another reason for the highly surprising admission by this witness?
Was she Lying?
Taking a speculative view, one would suggest that she would have had one main reasons for doing this.
To lead the police to the view, that the murder happened at a later date in order to possibly protect someone.? someone who had no alibi for the hours of darkness.
The police appeared at least initially to believe that the murder took place in daylight, and they also believed that the killer had someone who assisted them.
The letter sent to the Norfolk police, which comes across as a hoax, many of us dismiss, as it is out of area, but the fact remains that it states it was from 14, Dorset Street, the very house that the witness Maxwell lived in, which leaves one to conclude that it is indeed a ''small world''.
Coincidences do occur, but one week prior to a Ripper murder, sent from a residence right opposite the murder scene , shows incredible foresight ..don't you think?
Regards Richard.
Comment