If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
It does seem coincidental that the photo captures the windows (both with broken panes) and the door etc.
It looks like a professional photo for the time so i cant see any real reason why they would take a photo of 13 Millers Court for anything but by the police.
The broken window panes just nearly convince me - but who knows ??
...I'd never noticed that curtain, seemingly made of a thick, whitish material, behind the glass on the left-hand side, before. Compare and contrast the window nearest the door, which (as we might expect from the story) seems to have no such curtain.
Reasons to at least question the accepted wisdom on this photograph include the the fact that it was located in the possession of the City Police and not the Metropolitan Police (where it should have been) and there were later serious crimes at the same location.
An excellent point and one well worth considering. Mea culpa.
One other observation about the photo. Judging from the deformation of the brick corner pillar [it's not camera distortion] I'll bet the door to Room 13 didn't close too snugly.
Regards,
Simon
Never believe anything until it has been officially denied.
Stewart,
I think I follow what you are saying, however, what i think i would like to know is exactly where the photgraph was in fact found.
Would the City Police have needed a picture of it if (as you seem to suggest) it was taken at the time of one of the later murders
or am i just not following.
Jenni, no, the City Police, theoretically, would have no need to possess such a photograph at all, although we must bear in mind that they did have the photograph of Kelly's body on the bed which is obviously what made Don believe that they are connected and that the City may have provided the photographer. This makes Don's argument valid and reasonable but the outside view of the room was a glass plate negative and not a photograph. That said, a glass plate negative he found with the Room 13 shot was of Metropolitan policemen of about 1870. Confusing, isn't it? Personally I tend to the belief that it does show Room 13 Miller's Court at about the time of the murder.
It looks as if the bottom window pushes up from the inside. If the panes are broken, why would there be a need to latch the window. Perhaps the killer simply lifted it up and came out, pulling it closed behind him. He could have entered the same way. Perhaps I am looking at an optical illusion, however, and there is no such division into upper and lower windows.
Unfortunately, I have no Ripper books with me in ROK and must go on memory and what I find on Casebook, but I don't recall anything about a latched window. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong on that (I'm sure you will).
What I dont see is any broken glass beneath the window. If indeed the photo was taken shorltly after MJKs death. And if indeed the window was broken a few weeks before that. And if indeed there is no broken glass outside the window. Then either the broken glass was cleaned meticulously or the window was broken from the outside in.
I have a sneaking suspicion that the night of the fight something happened to the key. Mary may have gotten p*ssed and threw the key at Barnett as she walked away. Barnett after not finding the key probably punched the window in to open the door.
Comment