Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Limerick, the Key?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello Caroline.

    "You mean it's unreasonable to suggest that Mary Kelly was an alias [?]"

    Not at all.

    " . . . and that consequently no relatives realised who she was?"

    Did they not read the papers? Did they not correspond with her?

    Cheers.
    LC
    Er, Lynn, if the relatives never knew her as Mary Jane Kelly (especially if she had perhaps invented a past life for herself), how would they have recognised her from what the papers said? Would the reported details (some we know to be false, such as her little boy) even have registered with them after reading her (false) name?

    Who really knows who corresponded with her by that name, and what she wrote back about her situation, if anything?

    Love,

    Caz
    X
    "Comedy is simply a funny way of being serious." Peter Ustinov


    Comment


    • new identity

      Hello Caroline. Fair enough. You are suggesting she had absolutely no ties with any of her family and "a new identity"?

      I can live with that. But tell me, what sort of situation would most likely precipitate such an extreme strategy?

      Cheers.
      LC

      Comment


      • I know as much as you do, Lynn.

        She may or may not have had ties with family members under her real name (MJK or otherwise), but by the time she hit rock bottom and Dorset St she may have loosened the ties herself. Alternatively, she may never have been blessed with a proper family; never have grown up with two loving parents and the usual numerous siblings. She only told Barnett the bare necessities: several brothers, one a soldier, a 'respectable' sister, and a nice respectable story to tell anyone who asked, that she had been married but widowed young due to a tragic accident. Liz Stride used a similar story.

        I wouldn't go so far as to call it "a new identity" in the way you are thinking, and I see no 'extreme strategy' here either. Just another unfortunate unmarried woman reduced to dire straits by her twenties, and with no blood relations around her to mourn.

        Love,

        Caz
        X
        "Comedy is simply a funny way of being serious." Peter Ustinov


        Comment


        • down and out

          Hello Caroline. Thanks.

          "I know as much as you do, Lynn."

          More, like as not.

          I have always wondered why we know a good bit about unfortunates like Polly and Annie, but not MJK.

          And I still have trouble harmonising her being "down and out" with the story about West London and France.

          Cheers.
          LC

          Comment


          • Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
            Hello Caroline. Fair enough. You are suggesting she had absolutely no ties with any of her family and "a new identity"?

            I can live with that. But tell me, what sort of situation would most likely precipitate such an extreme strategy?

            Cheers.
            LC
            Hi Lynn,

            But tell me, what sort of situation would most likely precipitate such an extreme strategy?

            The extreme strategy, combined with heavy drinking? Fear, perhaps even terror. Fear of someone within her own family perhaps?

            Regards, Bridewell.
            I won't always agree but I'll try not to be disagreeable.

            Comment


            • family

              Hello Colin. Very well. The heavy drinking I can accept.

              Fear of a family member? Alright. Would that be the large Irish family described to Barnett? If so, then surely she would not hide from all of them but retain contact with some?

              But perhaps the large family was a fabrication? But to what purpose a fabrication if you are fearful of a single family member?

              Cheers.
              LC

              Comment


              • Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
                Hello Colin. Very well. The heavy drinking I can accept.

                Fear of a family member? Alright. Would that be the large Irish family described to Barnett? If so, then surely she would not hide from all of them but retain contact with some?

                But perhaps the large family was a fabrication? But to what purpose a fabrication if you are fearful of a single family member?

                Cheers.
                LC
                Hi Lynn,

                I was thinking of press reports claiming that her father had been looking for her, and she had, for whatever reason, been keen not to be found.

                If so, then surely she would not hide from all of them but retain contact with some?
                Yes, but only with those she trusted perhaps. Just speculating, to be honest, Lynn.

                Regards, Bridewell.
                I won't always agree but I'll try not to be disagreeable.

                Comment


                • contact

                  Hello Colin. But if she had kept contact with a few, surely they would have attended the funeral, contacted the police, etc?

                  Cheers.
                  LC

                  Comment


                  • Regularity

                    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
                    Hello Colin. But if she had kept contact with a few, surely they would have attended the funeral, contacted the police, etc?

                    Cheers.
                    LC
                    Hi Lynn,

                    Good point. If she was in contact with family members, we can't know how often they corresponded, though, can we? If their errant sister / daughter got in touch only very occasionally, how long might it be before they made the connection (if they ever did)?

                    Regards, Bridewell.
                    I won't always agree but I'll try not to be disagreeable.

                    Comment


                    • Nothing?

                      So right down the years not one of them said anything or made any enquiry? Dubious I'd have said, which implies to me a false identity, no familial contact, (but letters from a.n.other)...

                      All the best

                      Dave

                      Comment


                      • Time is on my side, yes it is.

                        Hi Colin. Thanks.

                        "If she was in contact with family members, we can't know how often they corresponded, though, can we?"

                        Concedo

                        "If their errant sister / daughter got in touch only very occasionally, how long might it be before they made the connection (if they ever did)?"

                        But surely at some point . . . ?

                        Cheers.
                        LC

                        Comment


                        • Por que?

                          Hello Dave. False identity indeed.

                          Now, the big question--Why?

                          Cheers.
                          LC

                          Comment


                          • Hi Lynn

                            I'm sure you're going to tell me she was really Dinsdale in hiding from Spiney Norman! (Aka Red Jim?)

                            Dave

                            Comment


                            • Hi Dave & Lynn,

                              I'm still reluctant to rule out the possibility of a true identity, but a false life history - something along the lines of MJK being the daughter of an itinerant family, so birth not registered, no census entries, that sort of thing. Perhaps they wrote to her, but she couldn't write back. It does seem strange that McCarthy was able to state that the letters for her used to come from "some part of Ireland" but that he couldn't be more precise.

                              Regards, Bridewell.
                              Last edited by Bridewell; 05-15-2012, 08:22 PM.
                              I won't always agree but I'll try not to be disagreeable.

                              Comment


                              • Ah philately again!

                                It does seem strange that McCarthy was able to state that the letters for her used to come from "some part of Ireland" but that he couldn't be more precise.
                                Hi Colin

                                Well let's be honest, unless he saw a full "CDS" postmark on an envelope, (unlike the far more common dumb "killer" postmark) he'd not be likely to be able to repeat any more than MJK told him...

                                All the best

                                Dave

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X