Originally posted by Sam Flynn
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Real Name
Collapse
X
-
protohistorian-Where would we be without Stewart Evans or Paul Begg,Kieth Skinner, Martin Fido,or Donald Rumbelow?
Sox-Knee deep in Princes & Painters with Fenian ties who did not mutilate the women at the scene, but waited with baited breath outside the mortuary to carry out their evil plots before rushing home for tea with the wife...who would later poison them of course
-
only for understanding...how came Elisabeth Phoenix to know so quickly (within three days which was quick in that day and age I think) that it was "her" Kelly (out of thousands of Mary Kellys in London) who had been found butchered in the East End.In heaven I am a wild ox
On earth I am a lion
A jester from hell and shadows almighty
The scientist of darkness
Older than the constellations
The mysterious jinx and the error in heaven's masterplan
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sox View PostSam, I have zero doubt in my mind she was a prostitute.Kind regards, Sam Flynn
"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sam Flynn View PostMy point had nothing to do with that, Sox - I've no doubt that she was a prostitute either. I merely pointed out that the stories Barnett and Phoenix heard from Kelly about her past differed in respect of the frequency of Kelly's visits to France. This inconsistency suggests, to me, that Kelly might have been "flowering up" her past on both occasions - more exaggeratedly so, perhaps, with Phoenix, who also heard that Kelly had lived the "life of a lady", had been driven around in a carriage etc.
"Street" Women without the attributes Mary had would not have been given such opportunities...they would end up in Marys later state much earlier in their lives.
Mary was marketable, still, when she was killed....its certainly no stretch to imagine a year or 2 less of hard life on her physique and face might have left her a very viable "escort" type prostitute....as the role of her France trip seems to suggest.
We also have witnesses other than Barnett of her "fine dresses" that were recovered....Im sure pawned or sold long before she is found dead in her bed.
Best regards
Comment
-
Originally posted by perrymason View PostWe also have witnesses other than Barnett of her "fine dresses" that were recovered....Im sure pawned or sold long before she is found dead in her bed.
Best regards
She was still young and pretty. So, why Whitechapel?
thanks,
curious
Comment
-
Originally posted by curious View PostIs there any information that indicates why she moved to the Whitechapel area? She's been there about 3 years, right?
She was still young and pretty. So, why Whitechapel?
thanks,
curious
We know she frequently had run arrears before Millers Court....and we know by her description that she should have been in a far better position to attract a client than say Mary Ann Cox....who was perhaps a future warning to Mary in some respects.
My best regards
Comment
-
Originally posted by curious View PostIs there any information that indicates why she moved to the Whitechapel area? She's been there about 3 years, right?
curious
In early 1887 she left Breezer's Hill to live with Fleming.
Amitiés,
David
Comment
-
Originally posted by perrymason View PostWe also have witnesses other than Barnett of her "fine dresses" that were recovered....
Incidentally, I sometimes wonder whether - if true - the recovery of the "dresses of costly description" wasn't an act of theft, or of receiving stolen goods, rather than a reclamation of property rightly belonging to Kelly herself.Kind regards, Sam Flynn
"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
Comment
-
Originally posted by DVV View PostNot that long apparently, although some accounts are conflicting.
In early 1887 she left Breezer's Hill to live with Fleming.
Amitiés,
David
There's testimony that a witness thought Fleming would marry her.
Was Fleming already in Whitechapel? Is that why they lived there together?
If that wasn't his home, why would they choose Whitechapel?
curious
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sam Flynn View PostIncidentally, I sometimes wonder whether - if true - the recovery of the "dresses of costly description" wasn't an act of theft, or of receiving stolen goods, rather than a reclamation of property rightly belonging to Kelly herself.
curious
Comment
-
Originally posted by curious View PostSo, possibly she thought she was leaving prostitution?
There's testimony that a witness thought Fleming would marry her.
Was Fleming already in Whitechapel? Is that why they lived there together?
If that wasn't his home, why would they choose Whitechapel?
curious
Fleming in Aug or Sept 1888, in the Victoria Home.
I don't know why Mary chose Whitechapel, but have some ideas regarding Fleming...
Amitiés
David
Comment
-
Just a few stray thoughts.
First, instead of all sorts of speculation about others using aliases so similar to "Mary Jane Kelly" perhaps it would be worthwhile to ponder "Kelly" herself adopting a name that was relatively common in the area at the time. In which case, of course, coincidence becomes the answer. As it is, the efforts of the best and brightest researchers have been stymied finding any documentation for "Kelly" as she described herself.
Secondly, though Kelly claimed to be about 25 there were, I recall, a couple of folks who claimed to know her by sight that averred she looked older, 30 or so. This is doubly interesting when you consider that all the other Canonic Five were initially said to look younger than what their ages turned out to be.
Just more points to ponder about this rather mysterious woman (and I suspect we can agree she was at least a woman).
Don."To expose [the Senator] is rather like performing acts of charity among the deserving poor; it needs to be done and it makes one feel good, but it does nothing to end the problem."
Comment
-
Good points, Don; thanks.
What you said about the victims' recorded ages vs. their claimed ages or their 'visual' ages is especially interesting.
We all know that their killer didn't ask them for birth certificates before killing them. Even if his warped psyche deliberately sought a particular type of victim in a particular age group, the killer still based his choices upon his own personal perceptions- which may or may not have been accurate, especially under poor lighting conditions.
Killers often choose a victim for symbolic reasons, whether conscious or unconscious, and it is their own psyche which ultimately decides
if a prospective victim in a given time and place is 'suitable' for their purposes.
Best regards, Archaic
Comment
-
Don,
It needs to be remembered that Walter Dew said in his memoirs that he knew Mary Kelly from his beat and that she was not only a beauty but also always looked fresh and clean.Mrs Phoenix said something very similar like---"she was as fair as a lilly" etc.Mind I think it was her landlord McCarthy who said she looked older and he probably saw her in a more jaundiced light as well as gaslight in his shop in the early hours after a night on the tiles.
Best
Norma
Comment
-
Norma,
What Walter Dew wrote many, many years later must, certainly, be part of the equation. But my experience in resolving that equation is that Dew's facts seem well balanced on the other side of the equal sign with his obvious embellishments. It may not be 50 years, but as I now remember women from when I was 25 they are all quite lovely, fair and fetching.
Don."To expose [the Senator] is rather like performing acts of charity among the deserving poor; it needs to be done and it makes one feel good, but it does nothing to end the problem."
Comment
Comment