never hurts to double check anything though does it?

anyway its not just the name which could be suspect, but her background, or at least what was recalled by witnesses of it. certainly, she could have been mary jane kelly on her birth (and baptism) certificate, but when exactly did she live in wales, and when was her birthday?
an ancestry search gives a lot of mary kellys and mary jane kellys and mary jane davies, mary davis, etc, so its perfectly possible she was a little scant with the truth when telling others, or of course they recalled it wrongly.
Leave a comment: