If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Back before the database crashed, there was extensive discussion trying to reconstruct Mary Kelly's face. All were imaginative, and sometimes convincing, but most drove home the terrible point that this was once a human being.
Unfortunately, from the crime scene photos showing extensive damage to here face, to the point of it being unrecognizable as a face, all reconstructions seem to be pareidolia. Quite like reading into a Rorschach. What Mary looked like and analysis of the Miller's Court photos is a fascinating obsession in this case and, like much of the ephemera, gleefully never to be resolved.
I'd be all for a comprehensive medical examination of MJK's remains and a careful and responsible evaluation and publication of the result but I can't see the point of a facial reconstruction. Exhumation just for the sake of creating yet another icon for romantic Ripperologists seems a bit too much for my taste.
~ All perils, specially malignant, are recurrent - Thomas De Quincey ~
Just wanted to let everyone know that I've been in contact with some forensic artists, to see what can and can't be done. They are analyzing the photo and sketches and will be using computer technology IF they can do anything. It's in the baby stages but since I've been speaking with them, they seem optimistic at this point. We may be able to get closer than before. Not prefect but darn close. The artists are from several places across the globe, so now we wait and see. I'm SO EXCITED - I might also be broke after this. LOL
"Truth only reveals itself when one gives up all preconceived ideas. ~Shoseki
When one has one's hand full of truth it is not always wise to open it. ~French Proverb
Every truth passes through three stages before it is recognized. In the first, it is ridiculed, in the second it is opposed, in the third it is regarded as self-evident. ~Arthur Schopenhauer
Comment