If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Thanks so much to everyone who has contributed to this thread. I have never seen any of these photos or read the article that was posted. Very interesting and some new knowledge for me. Thanks again.
So......no-ones going to mention that in the photographs and in the corresponding sketch there is clearly a window to Elizabeth Prater's room right above Marys larger window?
I don't think anybody ever said there wasn't.
Rob
Leave a comment:
Guest replied
Hey Celesta,
Ive seen them and I concur. I have a couple of books on the LVP unrelated to the crimes, and a picture in one shows the courtyard lane almost single file width. Thats how we describe a narrow fairway in golf, (you might know that if you play?)...in case you wondered why the "single file" line.
With Millers Court you have the additional dreariness of having to walk through a dark and dank archway for 20-25 feet before even arriving at the "spacious" couryard. From the photos I wouldnt guess much more than 7-8 feet in height. Picture that, 25 of what Ill bet were very smelly feet, with slick wet walls...no light, save the gaslight outside the Keyler's and Julia's doors shining onto Marys doorstep.
I live in an old part of Toronto, the Toronto Beaches, the church opposite me is the oldest parish in the city....(for us old is 1840's )...and from where I live heading west towards the city centre are some streets and lanes that were built in those early days....running south towards the water. Conventional cars cannot use them. I think you can straddle the entire street if youre 5'10" or taller. Mostly three storied housing on either side.
They were likely mutilple family homes or houses at some point in their history, its still a depressed area. Know what you find in these ghetto type areas? Lots of churches.
Hi Michael. If you ever see an uncropped version of the November 9th shot of #13 from the outside, you'll see that Prater's window is clearly visible above the pair in Mary's room.
I am sure Jake had an exact date for the Brushfield Street demolition image. It COULD be June. April was just a month that was sticking in my mind. As for the famous shots of the Miller's Court entrance being from June as well, well I know I definitely was told some time in the past it was January but that is only received information. On one hand, you could ask why an old woman would be sitting on a chair outside in January and on the other hand you could ask why an old woman would be sitting outside derelict buildings three days before they're demolished!
Take a look at the East End Photographs, etc. thread, if you haven't already. The last two or three pages is about some "courts" that are very reminiscent of Miller's Ct. You really get a sense of how claustrophobic these places were.
Best,
Cel
Leave a comment:
Guest replied
Hi all,
So......no-ones going to mention that in the photographs and in the corresponding sketch there is clearly a window to Elizabeth Prater's room right above Marys larger window?
That means at least one witness that night in that courtyard is credible,... when she said that the cry came "as from the court", it would seem that she had good reasons for saying so.
I believe the demolition photo was dated June 1928 when it first appeared on the boards 2 years ago. I can't remember who first posted it. It was from the Hulton Picture library.
Last edited by John Bennett; 11-18-2008, 03:04 AM.
Reason: I just said something obvious
I deeply appreciate this. I've been keeping an eye out for Matters' book. I saw one a while back, but someone beat me to the punch, and I didn't get it. Now, I plan to find it no matter what. Every time I've looked at the photo of the front side of the houses, I've asked myself why didn't he go into the court itself?! This has been very helpful, Rob. Thanks.
The actual full-sized image of the demolition is dated but I don't have access to it at the moment. I think it is sometime in April. Jake will be your man for that one. The famous pair of photos by Leonard Matters were taken, I think, in late January of that year just before they came down. This would explain, for example, the fact that the first floor (in the English sense) windows of #27 have been taken out in the Matters shots.
I'm looking at the picture of the front of the two buildings, #26 and #27, that Leonard Matters took in June 1928, according to the caption. The windows are already gone, at least in part on the upper floors, except for the two on the far right in #27. What prevented him from going into the passage? Was it already blocked or cut off from the public by this time? I'm just wondering why he didn't get closer and get the passage. Excuse my ignorance on this. Just doing a bit of wishful thinking here.
Extending the pic a little may be useful
1 to 3 - the three houses on the right hand side of Millers Court
4 - the wall at the end of Millers Court
26 - the back of 26 Dorset Street
27 - the back of 27 Dorset Street
Compare this with part of the Goads Map of Millers Court
Hi Brenda. Matters had nothing to do with the demolition picture. Matters took the two famous photographs of the entrance to Millers Court with the rickety chair at the side.
The photo on this thread was showing the demolition of the block. It's a big, wide photo showing all of the demolition of that side of Brushfield Street and Duval Street, around half the length of it. The whole of Millers Court, let alone #13, occupies less than 1% of the full image. It's a photographic needle in a haystack.
Leave a comment: